Tartumaa, Tartu municipality, Kõrveküla village, Kõrve tn 50 connection to project work (LC4723)

This tender is heavily weighted towards price, making cost-competitiveness the primary driver of success. Bidders must demonstrate a strong track record of similar electrical construction projects, particularly one exceeding €40,000, and ensure all personnel meet Elektrilevi's specific authorization and registration requirements. While social value and innovation are not explicitly requested, a focus on efficient execution and clear documentation will be crucial.

Cost-effective and compliant electrical installation services delivered by an experienced Elektrilevi partner.

Develop a meticulously calculated bid that is the lowest possible without jeopardizing profitability or quality. This requires detailed cost breakdown and efficiency analysis. Ensure all associated costs (labor, materials, overhead, profit) are accurately factored in to present a truly competitive offer.

Ensure the designated employee possesses the required switching authorization and that the work operation responsible person is registered in the Elektrilevi partner portal. Gather all necessary documentation to prove this compliance.

Given the 100% weighting on price, the core strategy must be to submit the lowest possible bid. This requires detailed cost engineering, efficient resource planning, and potentially accepting a leaner profit margin to secure the contract.

Select and meticulously detail at least three similar electrical construction work contracts completed in the last 60 months. Crucially, one of these must clearly demonstrate a value of at least €40,000 (excluding VAT), providing evidence of successful completion and scope.

Conduct a comprehensive internal review to ensure the bidder has not fallen under any mandatory or voluntary exclusion grounds as per procurement law. This includes checks for financial solvency, past legal issues, and compliance with tax obligations.

Ensure the price offer table is completed accurately and in the specified format. Pay close attention to any specific instructions within the 'Väikehanke alusdokumendid' and 'Vastavustingimused' documents.

Explicitly acknowledge and confirm adherence to the 'P135 Elektripaigaldise ehitustööde töövõtulepingu tüüptingimused ver. 23'. This demonstrates diligence and understanding of Elektrilevi's contractual framework.

This tender for electrical installation works in Estonia is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document formats.

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV codes and regulatory compliance. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. The financing conditions are clearly outlined.

The description of the project is clear, and the requirements for exclusion grounds, eligibility, and technical capabilities are well-documented. Evaluation criteria are specified, although the document outlining them is marked as 'No' for required status, which could be clearer.

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, some crucial documents (Lähteülesanne_LC4723, Maksumuse tabel) are in unsupported formats for AI analysis, potentially hindering full understanding without manual review. The 'Hindamiskriteeriumid' document is not marked as required.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the estimated value is disclosed. Evaluation is based on relative weighting, aiming for the economically most advantageous tender. Requirements for similar past contracts are objective and not tailored to specific companies.

E-submission is mandated. The contract start date is specified. Financing conditions are detailed, including payment terms and factoring program information. However, the reliance on .zip and .xls formats for critical documents presents a practical hurdle for automated analysis.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is clearly indicated.

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' but lacks specific criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This indicates a moderate level of sustainability integration.