Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Renovation of Karisöödi-Liivaku road

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307593
Value
€150,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€150,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of Karisöödi-Liivaku road
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the Karisöödi-Liivaku road renovation is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible compliant bid while demonstrating robust technical capability and adherence to all mandatory requirements. Given the lack of specific social or innovative aspects, a strong emphasis on cost-efficiency and proven execution will be paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective and Compliant Road Renovation

Proven Expertise in Land Reclamation and Road Maintenance

Reliable Execution within Budget and Timeline

Key Opportunities
Leveraging economies of scale for materials and labor to drive down costs.
Demonstrating a deep understanding of the technical specifications and local regulatory environment for land reclamation and road maintenance.
Streamlining project execution through efficient planning and resource allocation to minimize overheads.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost-saving measures, and benchmark against industry averages. Consider strategic partnerships or bulk purchasing for materials.

Ensuring full compliance with all mandatory requirements and submission formats, as non-compliance can lead to disqualification.

Establish a rigorous internal review process for all bid documents, including a checklist against all stated requirements. Assign dedicated personnel to verify document completeness and accuracy.

Potential for unforeseen site conditions or regulatory changes impacting costs.

Include a contingency within the bid price, clearly defined and justified. Thoroughly review the 'Lisa 3 Projekt' document for any potential site-specific challenges.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A highly efficient and cost-conscious construction company with a proven track record in road maintenance and land reclamation projects in Estonia. They should possess strong project management capabilities, a lean operational structure, and the ability to secure competitive pricing for materials and labor. Experience with similar-sized projects and a clear understanding of local regulations are essential.
Key Requirements
Compliance with land reclamation and road maintenance requirements
Accurate and competitive bid pricing
Submission using provided bid form and format
Bid security provision
Meeting equivalence requirements
Power of attorney for joint bidders (if applicable)
Exclusion of fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking (subcontractors)
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably lean operational model that translates directly into a lower cost base.
A highly detailed and efficient project execution plan that minimizes risk and maximizes productivity.
A strong, established relationship with local suppliers for cost-effective material sourcing.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, a bidder could consider a commitment to using locally sourced materials where feasible, contributing to the local economy. This could be a subtle differentiator if presented correctly, though not a primary evaluation factor.
Bid Focus Areas
Total bid cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible compliant bid price. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource planning, and potentially leveraging economies of scale. Every line item in the cost proposal must be scrutinized for potential savings without compromising quality or compliance.

Recommendations5
Aggressively Price to Win
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weighting on total bid cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible compliant bid. This involves detailed cost analysis, efficient resource allocation, and exploring all avenues for cost reduction in materials, labor, and overheads. Benchmark against historical project costs and industry standards to ensure competitiveness without sacrificing essential quality.

Directly maximizes score for the primary evaluation criterion.
Meticulous Compliance Check
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly review all tender documents, including 'Lisa 3 Projekt' and 'Lisa 5 Kasutatavad vormid', to ensure absolute compliance with all mandatory requirements, eligibility criteria, and submission formats. A single oversight can lead to disqualification. Implement a multi-stage internal review process.

Prevents disqualification and ensures eligibility.
Develop Detailed Technical Execution Plan
HighMed effort

While price is paramount, a clear and concise technical execution plan demonstrating how the works will be completed in compliance with land reclamation and road maintenance requirements is crucial. This plan should highlight efficiency and risk mitigation, indirectly supporting the cost-effectiveness of the bid.

Builds confidence in the bidder's capability and supports the pricing strategy.
Contingency Planning for Unforeseen Costs
HighMed effort

Incorporate a well-defined and justified contingency within the bid price to account for potential unforeseen site conditions or minor regulatory adjustments. This demonstrates foresight and protects the bidder from potential losses while maintaining a competitive price.

Reduces financial risk and ensures project profitability.
Optimize Subcontractor Due Diligence
MediumLow effort

If subcontractors are to be used, ensure they are thoroughly vetted for compliance with exclusion grounds (fraud, money laundering, human trafficking) as the contracting authority will check them during execution. This proactive approach prevents future issues.

Ensures compliance and avoids contract termination risks.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-efficient solution that fully meets all technical and legal requirements. Emphasize operational efficiency and a lean business model as the drivers of this competitive pricing. Highlight a proven track record of delivering similar projects on time and within budget, reinforcing reliability.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted in the open procedure for the renovation of Karisöödi-Liivaku road.
--The bid must include the bid name, registration code, and individual and total prices of the works.
--The bid must be submitted using the provided bid form.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority has not divided the procurement into lots because it is not economically or organizationally expedient, as it is the reconstruction of a single integral object.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must comply with the conditions set out in the tender documents.
--Bidders must provide a power of attorney for joint bidders.
--Bidders must provide a bid security.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The execution of the works must comply with current land reclamation and road maintenance requirements.
--The technical description specifies the works for the renovation of Karisöödi-Liivaku road and the renovation of the Matsimäe MK land reclamation system, including felling, stump removal, and ditch cleaning, in accordance with current laws and regulations.
--The contracting authority will check subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on the exclusion of fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the bid will be the primary evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307593_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 32.5 KB

This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on the exclusion of fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307593_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.0 KB

The compliance conditions document outlines requirements for bid submission, joint bidder power of attorney, bid security, and equivalency for the Karisöödi-Liivaku road renovation tender.

Lisa 1 - Hinnapakkumuse vormXLS
Lisa 1 - Hinnapakkumuse vorm_Karisöödi-Liivak... -- 29.3 KB

This document is the price offer form for the tender "Karisöödi-Liivaku road renovation", requiring the bidder's name, registration code, and unit and total prices for the works.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307593_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on the total cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307593_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.3 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion.

HankedokumentDOC
Hankedokument RH 307593.docx -- 24.3 KB

The State Forest Management Centre invites bids for the renovation of Karisöödi-Liivaku road in an open procurement procedure, requiring works to comply with current land reclamation and road construction standards.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2- Hankelepingu vorm_Karisöödi-Liivaku t... -- 69.8 KB

This document is a draft of the procurement contract, outlining the terms and requirements for the contractor undertaking the Karisöödi-Liivaku road renovation works.

Lisa 4 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 4 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 49.7 KB

This technical specification details the renovation works for Karisöödi-Liivaku road and the Matsimäe MK land reclamation system, including felling, stump removal, and ditch cleaning, in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road renovation is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of e-submission could be improved.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV classification and a clear, albeit relatively short, submission deadline. The organization's right to adjust contract dates is a common clause to manage procedural delays. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the technical specifications are detailed. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as price-based. Conditions for bid submission are documented.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' is noted as not intended for completion, which might cause minor confusion. Some technical documents are in unsupported formats.

Fairness85/100

The tender is open to all bidders, with objective criteria focused on price. Full document access is implied through the e-procurement platform. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, but the reliance on specific formats for some documents (e.g., .zip) could pose minor challenges. The contract start date is provided, and financing is implied through the estimated value.

Some technical documents are in unsupported formats (.zip), potentially hindering immediate analysis or integration.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and dates are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social responsibility considerations.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and scope of work.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Well-defined basic tender information.

Concerns

Limited sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Potential accessibility issues with .zip formatted documents.
Short submission deadline relative to complexity.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific green procurement or social responsibility clauses in future tenders.
2. Ensure all essential documents are provided in universally accessible formats.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline