Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login16 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
5 documents available with AI summaries
Bidders must provide confirmation regarding trade secrets, exclusion of subcontractors, and the bid's compliance with tender conditions, including clarification of equivalency.
The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.
The tender pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as initial evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.
The contracting authority seeks a general contractor for the historical well exposition works at Põltsamaa Castle courtyard, encompassing construction, material procurement, installation, permit acquisition, and documentation preparation.
Bidders are provided with instructions for participating in the procurement procedure, clarifying the subject of the procurement contract and the name of the simplified procurement.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for the exhibition of a historical well in Põltsamaa is moderately well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks specific details on sustainability and some documentation formats are not machine-readable.
The tender appears to adhere to general legal compliance standards. Deadlines are reasonable for the value and scope. The CPV code is provided, and there are no immediate red flags regarding disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The inclusion of 'or equivalent' is a positive indicator of flexibility.
The description of the project is clear, outlining the scope of work for the historical well's exhibition. Requirements are documented through the AI-extracted points and tender documents. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated. Conditions, including the 'or equivalent' clause, are also clear.
Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents are attached or referenced. However, the lack of readily analysable formats for some attached documents (like .asice and .xml for ESPD) slightly hinders a full assessment of completeness in terms of machine-readable data.
The tender is generally fair, with full document access implied and the value disclosed. Deadlines are reasonable, and the main evaluation criterion (price) is objective. The use of e-submission and e-procurement promotes fairness. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies.
E-submission and e-procurement are positive aspects for practicality. The contract start date is not explicitly specified, which is a minor drawback. Financing information is not detailed. The duration is specified.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequential.
The tender states 'EU Funded' but lacks specific criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This category receives a moderate score due to the lack of explicit sustainability considerations beyond general EU funding.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required