Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction and renovation works for Saku VV subordinate institutions 2026

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307555
Value
€150,100
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of works100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 15, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€150,100
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction and renovation works in the buildings of the subordinate institutions of the Saku Municipal Government: 1. Kindergarten Päikesekild, Saku Teaduse 14 2. Kindergarten Terake, Saku Tallinna mnt 12, Pargi 27, Juubelitammede tee 6 3. Kajamaa School, Saku Kooli tee 1 4. Kurtna School, Kurtna village Kurtna tee 50 5. Saku Rescue Centre, Saku Päästekeskuse tee 1 6. Kiisa Leisure Centre, Kiisa Kurtna tee 8 7. Saku Day Centre, Saku Juubelitammede tee 6 8. Public playgrounds of Saku Municipality 9. Saku Music School, Saku Tallinna mnt 10 10. Saku Gymnasium Primary School, Saku Tallinna mnt 10 11. Saku Health Centre, Saku Tiigi 19 12. Saku Youth Centre, Saku Uus Saku 3a
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--The bid must include information on the terms of the contract, technical description, and grounds for bid rejection.
--The bid must specify the cost of the works.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated, but general exclusion grounds may apply based on the ESPD and other documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must confirm compliance with the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements via the Hankepass (electronic confirmation).
--Joint bidders require a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must provide a cost breakdown and quantity table (Vorm 1 - kululoend ja mahutabel 2026.xlsx) detailing the cost of construction and renovation works, including specific object descriptions like Lasteaed Päikesekild.
--The contracting authority will check the background of subcontractors for criminal offenses, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the works will be evaluated, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307555_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal offenses, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307555_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.2 KB

The tender document clarifies requirements for joint bidder authorization, declaration of trade secrets, bid submission conditions, cost presentation, and site visit confirmation.

Vorm 1 kululoend ja mahutabel.XLS
Vorm 1 - kululoend ja mahutabel 2026.xlsx -- 53.0 KB

The bidder must submit a cost breakdown and quantity table detailing the costs of construction and renovation works for Saku Municipality's sub-institutions, including descriptions of work for specific sites like Päikesekild Kindergarten.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307555_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluates bids based on the total cost of works, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307555_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.8 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, but it is filled out electronically.

Hankelepingu projektPDF
Hankelepingu projekt.pdf -- 164.2 KB

The draft contract outlines the terms and conditions for construction and renovation works, specifying the objects, payment, and deadlines for works at Saku Municipality's subordinate institutions.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.pdf -- 275.0 KB

This document is a proposal for submitting a bid, outlining the tender procedure's conditions, formatting, and submission, along with information on contract terms, technical specifications, and bid rejection.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction and renovation works at Saku Municipality's subordinate institutions is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of submission could be improved.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance standards, including proper CPV code and clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. The financing condition is clearly stated as attached to the tender documents.

Clarity80/100

The description of works is clear, listing all specific locations. Requirements are documented, and evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting based on total cost. Conditions for bid submission and subcontractor checks are outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration type, and contract start date. However, the specific duration of the contract is not explicitly stated, only the tender validity period. The financing condition is linked to attached documents, which is acceptable but could be more directly stated.

Contract duration not explicitly stated.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, with full document access implied. The estimated value is disclosed, and criteria are objective (lowest price). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting fairness.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. A document URL for the opening place is provided. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is linked to attached documents. However, the specific duration of the contract is missing, impacting full practicality.

Contract duration not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).

Strengths

Clear description of works and locations
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Disclosure of estimated value

Concerns

Contract duration not explicitly stated
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Some document formats not AI-analyzable (e.g., .zip)

Recommendations

1. Explicitly state the contract duration.
2. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the evaluation or requirements.
3. Ensure all relevant documents are in AI-analyzable formats where possible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline