Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login14 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
11 documents available with AI summaries
The bidder must confirm they have reviewed and fully accept the tender conditions, commit to fulfilling the contract, and submit necessary power of attorney documents if applicable.
The tender cost is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum points.
The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is an initial self-declaration of a company's qualifications and compliance with tender conditions, intended for electronic completion.
This document is a power of attorney authorizing a representative to submit a bid for the University of Tartu's tender for the purchase of a Luminescence Spectrometer and an ICCD Detector.
This is a draft procurement contract outlining the terms for the purchase of a Luminescence Spectrometer and ICCD Detector, including price, payment terms, delivery time, and warranty.
The University of Tartu invites tenderers to participate in an open procurement procedure for the purchase of a Luminescence Spectrometer and an ICCD Detector, submitting their offers according to the terms and conditions set out in the tender notice and base documents.
This document provides instructions for participating in the tendering procedure, including document availability, requesting additional information, and tender compilation.
This document provides instructions for participating in the procurement procedure, explaining the base documents, communication, and bid preparation.
Bidders must submit a tender that complies with the detailed technical specifications for a luminescence spectrometer and ICCD detector, including requirements for focal length, aperture, input/output systems, autofocus, diffraction gratings, and other components.
This document contains powers of attorney required to authorize bidder representatives and joint bidders to submit a bid for the University of Tartu tender.
This document is a draft of the procurement contract, outlining the terms and conditions between the buyer and seller for the purchase of a luminescence spectrometer and ICCD detector.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for a luminescence spectrometer and ICCD detector is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve document accessibility for some elements.
The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a reasonable deadline. The procedure is identified as 'A', suggesting an open or similar standard procedure. No disputes are noted. The mention of 'or equivalent' for standards is a positive aspect for legal compliance and fairness.
The technical description is detailed, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is clearly stated. The requirement to read and accept tender conditions is explicit. The 'or equivalent' clause for standards enhances clarity by allowing for alternative compliant products.
Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines. However, the contract start date is provided, but the contract duration is stated as '3 months' which is short and might be a typo or refer to the tender validity period rather than the contract itself. The financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond 'EU Funded'.
The evaluation criterion being solely the lowest price is objective. The 'or equivalent' clause promotes fairness by not unduly restricting competition. E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. Full document access is implied by the availability of multiple documents, though some are marked as 'No' for required status.
E-submission and e-procurement are positive. The contract start date is provided. However, the duration of '3 months' for the tender validity is short, and if it refers to the contract duration, it is highly impractical for such equipment. The financing information is not detailed.
Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, with the opening date following the submission deadline. No suspension or disputes are indicated.
The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain EU standards, but there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided text. This is a missed opportunity to encourage sustainable practices.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required