Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login17 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
7 documents available with AI summaries
Bidders must confirm compliance with terms, submit joint bidder authorization, describe trade secrets, confirm bid conformity, provide bid cost, and team member details.
The contracting authority evaluates snow removal service bids based on various criteria, where the lowest cost bid receives the most points.
The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and expected response format, but is not intended for completion.
This document is an act of completed works, used for documenting the execution of the snow removal service contract.
The contracting authority, SA Tallinna Kultuurikatel, is seeking snow removal services for its territories and parking lots during the winter period.
This document is a draft contract for snow removal services, outlining the parties, object, and purpose of the agreement for the Tallinn Creative Hub Foundation.
The Foundation Tallinn Creative Hub invites bids for mechanized snow removal services for the territories of Kultuurikatel, Salme and Mere Cultural Centers through a simplified procurement procedure.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for snow removal services is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some documentation formats are not directly analyzable.
The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable timeline. No immediate legal compliance issues were detected. The procedure type (LM) suggests a simplified process, which is generally acceptable.
The description of services is clear, and the requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and financial aspects are well-defined. The evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting with the lowest cost receiving the most points, which is understandable.
Most essential information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the AI could not analyze all attached documents (e.g., .xml, .zip), potentially hiding some crucial details. The 'Hankepass' explanation is a bit convoluted.
The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation criteria are objective (lowest cost). There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. The 'Max Participants: 1' is unusual and could be a point of concern if not justified by the nature of the service.
E-submission and e-procurement are positive. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration. Financing information is not detailed. The 'Hankepass' explanation could be clearer for practical application.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the context of the tender timeline.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This is a missed opportunity to align with modern procurement standards.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required