Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction of Nelgi tee

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307087
Value
€2,500,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 05, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of construction project works100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€2,500,000
Duration
14 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

This project involves the reconstruction of the Nelgi tee infrastructure in accordance with the prepared project and the client's conditions.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Nelgi tee reconstruction is heavily weighted on price, making cost leadership a primary driver. Bidders must demonstrate strong technical capability in road, drainage, and lighting systems, while leveraging the 'Innovative Aspects' to differentiate beyond price. A thorough understanding of the project documentation and general terms is crucial for a compliant and competitive bid.

Key Winning Messages

Delivering cost-effective, high-quality reconstruction of Nelgi tee through efficient project management and innovative solutions.

Ensuring seamless integration of road, drainage, and lighting systems for a durable and functional outcome.

Proactive risk management and transparent communication throughout the 14-month project duration.

Key Opportunities
Leveraging 'Innovative Aspects' to differentiate beyond price.
Detailed cost breakdown in the unit price table can highlight cost efficiencies.
Demonstrating strong experience in similar municipal infrastructure projects.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost-based evaluation.

Develop a highly optimized cost model, identify all potential cost savings without compromising quality, and explore efficiencies in material sourcing and labor deployment. Consider value engineering opportunities that don't add significant upfront cost but improve long-term value.

Ensuring full compliance with all technical specifications and general terms.

Conduct a thorough review of the 'TEHNILINE KIRJELDUS' and 'ÜLDTINGIMUSED_Töövõtuleping_Juriidiline isik' documents. Assign dedicated resources to verify all requirements, including subcontractor qualifications and the electronic Hankepass submission process.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A medium-to-large construction company with a proven track record in municipal infrastructure projects, specifically road reconstruction, drainage systems, and street lighting installation. The ideal bidder will have a robust cost management system, experience with electronic procurement platforms (Hankepass), and the capacity to propose innovative solutions within the project's scope, even without explicit green or social value requirements.
Key Requirements
Completed unit price table of tender cost including all necessary costs.
Compliance with General Terms and Conditions of the Works Contract (authorizations, licenses, experience, subcontractors).
Detailed technical specifications and instructions for reconstruction works.
Electronic submission via Hankepass.
Background checks for subcontractors regarding fraud, money laundering, or terrorism financing.
Key Discriminators
Proposing a specific, well-defined innovative solution that addresses a potential challenge or improves an aspect of the reconstruction (e.g., a novel drainage solution, smart lighting integration, or a more efficient construction methodology).
Demonstrating exceptional project management capabilities with a clear plan for minimizing disruption to local residents and traffic.
A highly competitive and transparent unit price breakdown that clearly articulates value for money.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a brief mention of local employment opportunities or waste reduction strategies during the reconstruction phase. This can be framed as good practice rather than a formal commitment.
Bid Focus Areas
Total cost of construction project works100.0%

Achieve the lowest possible total cost by meticulously detailing all unit prices, identifying efficiencies in labor, materials, and equipment. Ensure the unit price table is comprehensive and accurately reflects all project needs. Benchmark against industry standards to ensure competitiveness while maintaining profitability.

Recommendations5
Master the Unit Price Table for Cost Leadership
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant resources to developing a highly accurate and competitive unit price table. This involves detailed costings for every component of the reconstruction, including labor, materials, equipment, overheads, and profit. Explore opportunities for bulk purchasing, efficient scheduling, and optimized resource allocation to drive down costs.

Directly impacts the highest weighted evaluation criterion, maximizing score.
Propose a Concrete Innovative Solution
HighMed effort

Identify a specific, actionable innovation that can be integrated into the reconstruction. This could relate to materials, construction methods, or technology. Clearly articulate the benefits of this innovation (e.g., improved durability, reduced maintenance, faster installation) and how it aligns with the project's overall goals, even if not explicitly detailed in the tender.

Sets the bid apart from price-only competitors.
Thoroughly Review and Comply with Contractual Terms
CriticalMed effort

Conduct a meticulous review of the 'ÜLDTINGIMUSED_Töövõtuleping_Juriidiline isik' and 'TEHNILINE KIRJELDUS'. Ensure all authorizations, licenses, and experience requirements are met. Pay close attention to subcontractor clauses and the process for background checks.

Ensures bid eligibility and avoids disqualification.
Master the Hankepass Electronic Submission
CriticalLow effort

Familiarize the bid team with the electronic Hankepass (ESPD) platform and its requirements. Ensure timely and accurate completion of all sections, as it serves as initial proof of compliance. Seek clarification from the contracting authority if any ambiguities arise.

Essential for bid submission and compliance.
Subcontractor Due Diligence for Reliability
HighMed effort

Implement a rigorous due diligence process for all proposed subcontractors, focusing on their financial stability, past performance, and crucially, their background checks for fraud, money laundering, or financing of terrorism. Obtain all necessary documentation and explanations from subcontractors well in advance.

Mitigates risks associated with subcontractor reliability and compliance.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the quality and technical integrity of the reconstruction. Highlight any innovative aspects that offer tangible benefits to the contracting authority or end-users.
Emphasize a strong track record in similar municipal infrastructure projects, showcasing successful completion of projects with comparable scope and complexity.
Demonstrate a proactive and transparent approach to project management, assuring the contracting authority of minimal disruption and efficient execution.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The tenderer must submit a completed unit price table of the tender cost, which includes all costs necessary for the execution of the works and is evaluated based on the total cost.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-03-31 10:00:00.
--The contract duration is 14 months.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority has not divided the public procurement into parts, because the subject of the public procurement is a uniform service (thing), the division of which into parts is not expedient (RHS § 27 para 2).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tenderer must submit a completed unit price table of the tender cost, which includes all costs necessary for the execution of the works and is evaluated based on the total cost.
--The contracting authority checks the background of subcontractors in relation to criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering or financing of terrorism, requiring relevant explanations and evidence of reliability.
--General terms and conditions of the works contract stipulate the components of the contract, the contractor's confirmations, obligations and rights, including requirements for authorizations, licenses, experience and the use of subcontractors.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The contracting authority Viimsi Vallavalitsus is looking for a contractor to carry out the reconstruction works of Nelgi tee, which include the renewal of the road surface, rainwater and sewage systems, footpaths and street lighting.
--Project documentation contains detailed technical specifications and instructions for carrying out the reconstruction works of Nelgi tee.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is valued at 2,500,000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated based on the total cost of the works according to the construction project, where the lowest price will receive the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307087_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 53.3 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307087_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.9 KB

The bidder must submit a completed unit price table for the tender cost, which includes all expenses necessary for carrying out the work and will be evaluated based on the total cost.

Pakkuja esitab pakkumuste esitamise tähtajaks pakkumuse maksumuse ühikhinnatabel...XLS
Pakkumuse maksumuse ühikhinnatabel.xlsx -- 42.5 KB

Bidders must submit a unit price table for the tender cost, detailing expenses for site preparation and general works.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307087_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

In the tender "Nelgi tee reconstruction", bids will be evaluated based on the total cost of construction project works, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307087_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 75.5 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions, but it is filled out electronically, not directly.

ProjektdokumentatsioonDOC
Projektdokumentatsioon.docx -- 13.6 KB

The project documentation contains detailed technical specifications and instructions for carrying out the reconstruction works of Nelgi tee.

TEHNILINE KIRJELDUSDOC
TEHNILINE KIRJELDUS.docx -- 81.3 KB

The contracting authority, Viimsi Municipality Government, is seeking a contractor to carry out reconstruction works on Nelgi tee, including the renovation of the road surface, storm water and sewage systems, sidewalks, and street lighting.

Töövõtulepingu projekt Nelgi tee rekonstrueerimineDOC
Töövõtulepingu projekt Nelgi tee rekonstrueer... -- 35.8 KB

This draft contract outlines the terms, deadlines, and payment procedures for the reconstruction of Nelgi tee, crucial for bidders to understand the agreement's specifics.

ÜLDTINGIMUSED_Töövõtuleping_Juriidiline isikPDF
ÜLDTINGIMUSED_Töövõtuleping_Juriidiline isik.... -- 204.1 KB

The general terms of the works contract define the components of the contract, the contractor's confirmations, obligations, and rights, including requirements for authorizations, licenses, experience, and the use of subcontractors.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of certain documentation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable timeline. The justification for not dividing the tender into parts is provided, referencing relevant legislation. No immediate legal compliance issues were detected.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the technical specifications are detailed in the provided project documentation. Evaluation criteria are mentioned, although the specific weighting is not detailed in the provided text. The conditions for contract execution are outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the 'Tender Valid' duration (3 months) is provided, but the contract start date is not explicitly stated, impacting the overall completeness. Not all documents are fully accessible or summarized for AI analysis.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the evaluation is based on objective criteria (lowest price). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. Full document access is generally provided, though some technical documents might require direct access through the e-procurement portal.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is mandated, which is a positive aspect. However, the financing information is not detailed, and the contract start date is missing, which could affect practical planning for bidders. The URL for the opening place is provided.

Financing information not detailed.
Contract start date missing.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and estimated value are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is clear.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement or social aspects. While 'Innovation Focus' is listed as a characteristic, specific sustainability goals or criteria are not detailed. The funding source (EU funded) is not specified.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Lack of explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and project documentation.
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Mandatory electronic submission and e-procurement.
Well-defined CPV code and location.

Concerns

Missing contract start date.
Limited information on financing.
Absence of explicit sustainability considerations.

Recommendations

1. Specify the contract start date for better planning.
2. Include details on financing sources.
3. Incorporate explicit sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility).

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline