Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login19 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
8 documents available with AI summaries
The bidder must confirm they have reviewed and fully accept the tender conditions, that the offered equipment is new and compliant, and that the bid is valid for at least 3 months.
The contracting authority will evaluate bids solely based on the total cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum points.
The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the company, containing conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not a document intended for completion.
This document outlines the tender base documents, communication procedures, and bid preparation requirements, serving as a crucial part of bid formulation.
The University of Tartu is seeking an inverted microscope with epifluorescence and phase contrast, including a camera and monitor, for its BSL2 laboratory, capable of data recording without a computer.
Bidders must submit a power of attorney that proves their representative's right to submit a bid and conclude contracts, especially for joint bidders.
This document is a draft contract outlining the terms, payment conditions, deadlines, and handover procedures for the purchase of a microscope.
This document outlines the requirements for submitting a bid in Tartu University's inverted microscope tender, including qualification and submission conditions.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for an inverted microscope is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the clarity of some procedural documents.
The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV codes and a clear timeline. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope of the procurement. No immediate regulatory compliance issues are flagged.
The technical description of the microscope is clear, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated. The requirement for 'or equivalent' for standards is a good practice for clarity. However, the distinction between 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' and other condition documents could be clearer.
Most essential information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents like technical specifications and draft contract are referenced. However, the 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' is not analyzed due to format, and the necessity of 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' is unclear.
The evaluation is based on a single, objective criterion (lowest price), promoting fairness. The 'or equivalent' clause for standards enhances accessibility. E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.
E-submission and e-procurement are positive. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, detailed financing information beyond the estimated value is not explicitly provided, and the URL for opening place is generic.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The timeline is consistent.
The tender mentions 'EU Funded' but lacks specific green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria, which are common in modern tenders.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required