Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction of the courtyard building of the Defence League General Staff

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306882
Value
€225,800
Location
Estonia
Published
March 09, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€225,800
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement is the design and construction works, as well as other works and activities necessary for the reconstruction of the courtyard building of the Defence League General Staff located at Toompea tn. 8 in Tallinn, as a general contractor, in accordance with the volumes, conditions, and requirements set out in the procurement tender documents and the main project "Courtyard Building of the Defence League General Staff" (work no. 2512) by AS Resand.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the reconstruction of the Kaitseliit General Staff courtyard building is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive cost optimization, meticulous adherence to technical specifications, and a clear, concise bid submission. While social and green aspects are not explicitly required, demonstrating efficiency and reliability will be key differentiators.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: Delivering high-quality reconstruction at the most competitive price.

Reliable Execution: Proven ability to complete projects efficiently and to specification within tight deadlines.

Streamlined Process: A clear, well-managed approach to reconstruction, minimizing risk and maximizing efficiency.

Key Opportunities
Aggressive pricing due to 100% price weighting.
Simplified submission process due to lack of complex evaluation criteria beyond price.
Potential for efficiency gains by integrating design and construction planning effectively, even with zero design cost allocation in the unit price schedule.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% price weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost savings in labor, materials, and overhead. Explore efficient construction methodologies. Consider a lean operational model for this project.

Ensuring all technical specifications are met precisely, especially given the tight 4-month duration.

Develop a detailed project schedule with clear milestones. Assign experienced personnel to oversee quality control and adherence to the technical specification (HD Lisa I). Proactive communication with the contracting authority regarding any potential ambiguities.

Potential for unforeseen issues during reconstruction of an existing building.

Include a contingency within the bid price, but ensure it is justifiable and transparent in the bid structure. Conduct a thorough site visit (if possible) and review of existing documentation to identify potential risks.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized construction company with proven experience in office building reconstruction, a strong track record of delivering projects on time and within budget, and efficient operational processes that allow for highly competitive pricing. The bidder should have a streamlined approach to design integration and a clear understanding of Estonian construction regulations.
Key Requirements
Submission of Unit Price Schedule in specified format (HD_Lisa_III_Vorm_4_yhikhindade_esildis_06032026.xlsx) with design costs as zero.
Familiarization with tender documents and confirmation of understanding.
Adherence to the Technical Specification (HD Lisa I) for scope, volume, and requirements.
Submission of bid price structure and unit price schedule.
Contract duration of 4 months.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated cost-efficiency through optimized construction methods and supply chain management.
A clear, concise, and error-free bid submission that instills confidence in the bidder's professionalism and attention to detail.
A project execution plan that clearly outlines how the 4-month deadline will be met with high-quality results.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, a commitment to employing local labor where feasible can be subtly highlighted in the project execution plan as a demonstration of community engagement and efficient resource utilization.
Bid Focus Areas
Bid price100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price while ensuring all technical requirements can be met. This involves meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource allocation, and potentially leveraging existing supplier relationships for favorable material costs. Ensure the unit price schedule is perfectly aligned with the technical specification and the 'design costs as zero' requirement.

Recommendations6
Aggressive Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a highly competitive bid price by meticulously analyzing all cost components. Focus on operational efficiency, lean project management, and leveraging economies of scale or existing supplier agreements. Ensure the unit price schedule is accurate and reflects the lowest feasible costs for each item.

Maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Flawless Unit Price Schedule Submission
CriticalMed effort

Pay extreme attention to detail when completing the unit price schedule (HD_Lisa_III_Vorm_4_yhikhindade_esildis_06032026.xlsx). Ensure all fields are populated correctly, design costs are zero as instructed, and the format precisely matches the provided template. Any errors here could lead to disqualification.

Ensures compliance with submission requirements and avoids immediate disqualification.
Thorough Tender Document Familiarization
CriticalMed effort

Ensure all team members involved in bid preparation have thoroughly read and understood all tender documents, including the Technical Specification (HD Lisa I) and the Draft Contract (HD Lisa II). Confirm understanding of all obligations and requirements.

Prevents misinterpretations and ensures the bid accurately reflects the contracting authority's needs.
Demonstrate Project Execution Efficiency
HighLow effort

While not explicitly evaluated, subtly highlight in the bid narrative or supporting documents how your company's processes ensure efficient project delivery within the 4-month timeframe. This could include streamlined workflows, experienced site management, or effective use of technology.

Builds confidence in the contracting authority regarding timely completion, even with a price-focused evaluation.
Contingency Planning for Reconstruction
HighMed effort

Incorporate a reasonable and justifiable contingency into the bid price to account for potential unforeseen issues common in reconstruction projects. This should be reflected in the bid price structure and unit prices.

Protects profitability and ensures project completion without cost overruns, maintaining client satisfaction.
Clarify Ambiguities Early
MediumLow effort

If any aspect of the technical specification or contract documents is unclear, submit a formal clarification request to the contracting authority well before the deadline. This demonstrates diligence and ensures the bid is fully compliant.

Avoids costly errors and potential disputes post-award.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as offering the best possible value for money, emphasizing cost-effectiveness without compromising on the quality of reconstruction. Highlight a lean and efficient operational model that translates directly into savings for the contracting authority. Focus on a clear, concise, and error-free submission that conveys professionalism and reliability.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (3)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-06 11:00:00.
--The duration of the contract is 4 months.
--The tender is not divided into lots.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm mandatory familiarization with the tender.
--Joint bidders must provide a power of attorney (if applicable).
--Bidder's representative must provide a power of attorney (if applicable).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is for office building construction works.
--The project involves reconstruction of the Kaitseliit General Staff courtyard building.
--Technical description defines the content, scope, and requirements of the reconstruction works, including design and construction.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total value of the tender is 225,800.0 EUR.
--Bidders must submit a structure of the bid price.
--Bidders must submit a unit price schedule.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306882_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 12.9 KB

Bidders must submit proof of mandatory site visit, a power of attorney for joint bidders (if applicable), a power of attorney for the bidder's representative (if applicable), subcontractor details (if applicable), and adhere to the tender cost structure and submit unit price schedules.

Ühispakkujate volikiri - HD Lisa III vorm 1.DOC
HD_Lisa_III_vorm_1_yhise_pakkumuse_volikiri.d... -- 20.2 KB

A joint bidder authorization is a required document confirming that multiple companies are submitting a joint bid and are jointly and severally liable for its fulfillment.

Pakkuja esindaja volikiri - HD Lisa III vorm 2.DOC
HD_Lisa_III_vorm_2_pakkuja_esindaja_volikiri.... -- 20.2 KB

The bidder must submit a power of attorney that proves the representative's right to sign the bid.

Alltöövõtjate andmed - HD Lisa III vorm 3.DOC
HD_Lisa_III_vorm_3_alltoovotjate_andmed.docx -- 20.6 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to submit data on all subcontractors directly involved in the execution of the contract on form HD Annex III Form 3.

Ühikhindade esildis - HD Lisa III vorm 4.XLS
HD_Lisa_III_Vorm_4_yhikhindade_esildis_060320... -- 30.5 KB

Bidders must submit a unit price form (HD Lisa III vorm 4) detailing project costs, with design costs listed as zero.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306882_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306882_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.5 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion itself.

HD Juhised pakkujalePDF
HD_Juhised_pakkujale_KL_Hoovimaja_06032026.pd... -- 305.9 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders on submitting proposals for the reconstruction of the Kaitseliit General Staff courtyard building, outlining the tender's scope, procedure, and documentation.

HD Lisa II - Hankelepingu projektPDF
HD_Lisa_II_Hankelepingu_projekt_KL_Hoovimaja_... -- 340.5 KB

This draft contract project defines the terms for the reconstruction of the Kaitseliit General Staff courtyard building, including contractor obligations, contract value, and deadlines.

HD Lisa I - Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
HD_Lisa_I_Tehniline_kirjeldus_KL_Hoovimaja_06... -- 290.0 KB

This technical specification defines the scope, volume, and requirements for the reconstruction of the Kaitseliit General Staff courtyard building, including design and construction works and other related activities.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the reconstruction of the Kaitseliit General Staff courtyard building is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and submission requirements. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on price as the sole evaluation criterion.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are indicated. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the technical specifications are detailed. Requirements for submission are well-documented, and the evaluation criteria, while singular, are explicitly stated.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, the absence of explicit details on financing sources and the limited scope of sustainability aspects could be improved.

Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. Criteria are objective (price), and deadlines are reasonable. Full document access is implied through the e-procurement platform. No specific tailoring to individual companies was detected.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is limited. The duration is specified.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are populated. Dates are logical, and no suspension or disputes are indicated.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Lack of green procurement criteria.
Absence of social or innovation considerations.

Strengths

Clear technical description and requirements.
Standard e-procurement process.
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value.
Well-defined CPV code and location.

Concerns

Sole reliance on price for evaluation.
Limited sustainability considerations.
Missing explicit contract start date.

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating qualitative evaluation criteria beyond price.
2. Integrate sustainability aspects (e.g., energy efficiency, waste management) into technical requirements.
3. Specify the contract start date or a clear mechanism for its determination.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline