Skip to main content
Tenders

External Audit Services

Open
Deadline
373 days left
April 04, 2027
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
018660-2026
Value
£375,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 28, 2027

Submission Deadline

April 04, 2027

Contract Start Date

April 04, 2027

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£375,000
Duration
36 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

1. Introduction: The Arts University Bournemouth (“AUB” or “the University”) wishes to appoint an external auditor to undertake the annual audit of the University and its subsidiary companies. This tender invites proposals from suitably qualified and independent firms to provide a comprehensive external audit service in accordance with current regulatory requirements and best practice in higher education. The audit will cover the University’s consolidated financial statements and those of each subsidiary entity and will include a separate regularity opinion and other audit-related reports as required. 2. The client: AUB is a specialist university providing education in art, design, media and performance. It is a higher education corporation and an exempt charity regulated by the Office for Students (OfS). The University operates from its campus in Poole, Dorset and serves a community of undergraduate, postgraduate and research students. AUB has a number of subsidiary companies, currently including AUB Services Ltd (which is dormant and holds property assets) and AUB Enterprises Ltd, which operates the University’s innovation and business‑incubation facilities. In addition, the University consolidates an associated charity, Arts University Bournemouth Charitable Foundation, whose trustees include members of the University’s Board. Financial statements are prepared on a consolidated basis for the year ending 31 July and must be audited within five months of the year‑end. 3. Background and scope of the contract: The University periodically retenders its external audit services to ensure probity and value for money. The current contract has reached the end of its agreed term, and the University therefore invites tenders for the appointment of external auditors for a proposed term of three years (financial years 2026/27 to 2028/29) with an option to extend for up to two additional years, subject to satisfactory performance. The contract covers the audit of: The consolidated financial statements of AUB prepared under the Statement of Recommended Practice: Accounting for Further and Higher Education and Financial Reporting Standard (FRS 102) (or any successor) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted in the UK. The individual financial statements of AUB Services Ltd and AUB Enterprises Ltd and any new subsidiaries incorporated during the contract period. The financial statements of the Arts University Bournemouth Charitable Foundation. Any other returns or statements that require an external audit opinion, including the Teachers’ Pension Scheme return and the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) Finance Record or its successor. 4. Regulatory environment and audit requirements: Under the Higher Education and Research Act 2017 and the OfS’s regulatory framework, AUB is required to have its financial statements audited by independent external auditors who are registered on the Register of Statutory Auditors. Further more as a Charity the audit firm must also comply with FRC audit standards. Key requirements include: Independence – The external auditor must be independent of the University and of the preparers of the accounts and must not carry out work that compromises that independence. The OfS requires that the trial balance is prepared and approved by the University, not by the auditors. The audit firm must confirm that it is listed on the Register of Statutory Auditors. Audit opinion – The auditor must report on whether the financial statements give a true and fair view of the University’s financial position and performance and whether they have been properly prepared in accordance with UK GAAP/FRS 102 or IFRS and the OfS Accounts Direction. The auditor’s report must also state whether funds from the OfS, UK Research & Innovation, Education and Skills Funding Agency and other funders have been applied for the purposes provided and in accordance with relevant terms and conditions. Regularity opinion – The auditor must provide an opinion on the regularity and propriety of the University’s use of public funds and confirm that OfS requirements (including the accounts direction) have been met. The OfS guidance emphasises that the external auditor’s report must cover all components of the financial statements and be signed by the auditor, the accountable officer and the chair of the governing body. Management letter – The auditor must produce a management letter (or equivalent) highlighting significant accounting and control issues, making recommendations and noting the extent of reliance on the internal audit service. The management letter and management responses must be presented to the Audit & Risk Committee in time to inform its annual report. Providers registered with the OfS must publish their audited financial statements within two weeks of being signed and, at the latest, five months after the financial year‑end. The University is accountable for submitting financial returns through the OfS portal in accordance with the Annual Financial Return guidance and the Accounts Direction. 5. Standards and reporting framework: The audit must be conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) issued by the Financial Reporting Council and take account of: The Statement of Recommended Practice: Accounting for Further and Higher Education (SORP) and any subsequent revisions. The OfS Accounts Direction and related Regulatory Advice 14 (Guidance for the Annual Financial Return), which specify content and disclosure requirements and emphasise auditor independence. Relevant legislation, including the Companies Act (where applicable), the Charities Act, and the Teachers’ Pension Regulations. The University’s Financial Framework and Regulations, which set out governance arrangements, the responsibilities of the Board, the Finance & Resources Committee and the Audit & Risk Committee. 6. Scope of services: The appointed audit firm will be required to: Plan and execute the audit of the University and each subsidiary and associated entity to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Test systems of financial control, review accounting policies and evaluate the appropriateness of accounting estimates and judgements. Provide an audit report on the consolidated financial statements, separate reports for each subsidiary company and the charity, and any required regularity reports. Audit the Teachers’ Pension Scheme return and provide assurance as required by the Teachers’ Pension Agency. U.S. Federal (Title IV) audit requirements. Experience delivering audit services that comply with U.S. Federal (Title IV) audit requirements applicable to UK universities enrolling U.S. students receiving federal financial aid. Audit the HESA Finance Record or its successor and ensure consistency with the audited financial statements. Prepare and present a management letter summarising findings and recommendations, including comments on internal control weaknesses, compliance with regulations and any matters arising from the audit of subsidiary companies. Attend meetings of the Audit & Risk Committee, Finance & Resources Committee and Board of Governors where audit matters are considered, including presenting the audit plan and audit findings. Provide advice on technical accounting and regulatory developments affecting the higher education sector where such advice does not compromise auditor independence.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

37 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (29)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Proposals must be submitted from suitably qualified and independent firms.
--The audit firm must confirm that it is listed on the Register of Statutory Auditors.
--Providers registered with the OfS must publish their audited financial statements within two weeks of being signed and, at the latest, five months after the financial year-end.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Firms must be registered on the Register of Statutory Auditors.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be a suitably qualified and independent firm.
--Must be registered on the Register of Statutory Auditors.
--Must comply with FRC audit standards as a Charity.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS29
--Ability to undertake the annual audit of the University and its subsidiary companies.
--Ability to provide a comprehensive external audit service in accordance with current regulatory requirements and best practice in higher education.
--Ability to audit consolidated financial statements and those of each subsidiary entity.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly stated, but implied to be financially sound to undertake the contract.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for external audit services is generally well-structured, with a clear scope and detailed requirements. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and a reveal date for submissions, impacting completeness and legal compliance.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears compliant with general procurement regulations, specifying a clear CPV code and detailing regulatory requirements. However, the absence of an explicit reveal date for submitted documents and the lack of specified evaluation criteria could present minor issues regarding procedural transparency and legal certainty. Deadlines, while present, are a significant point of concern.

Missing reveal date for submissions
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of services, client, and scope is exceptionally clear and detailed, leaving little room for ambiguity. Requirements are well-documented and specific, based on the AI-extracted list. The criteria for success, while not explicitly listed under an 'evaluation' section, are implicitly derived from the extensive technical and regulatory requirements.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the absence of a specific reveal date for received documents and a clear set of evaluation criteria prevents a higher score. While core details are there, the procedural completeness is impacted.

Missing reveal date
No explicit evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is fair, with full access to documentation (implied by the tender structure), disclosed value, and objective, detailed criteria derived from regulatory and technical needs. The use of a competitive flexible procedure and e-procurement (implied by the system) supports fairness. Requirements are not tailored to specific companies, promoting an open market.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration, and the estimated value is clear. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission mechanisms, direct document URLs, and specific financing details limits its practicality. The implied manual submission process, if e-submission is not explicitly stated, would also be a drawback.

No explicit mention of e-submission method
No direct document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and CPV are populated correctly. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for submission deadline and contract start are identical, which is illogical and indicates a data inconsistency that needs immediate correction.

Submission Deadline and Contract Start Date are identical and illogically set to the same time.
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation initiatives. It is not indicated as EU funded. While not a mandatory requirement for all tenders, the lack of any such considerations results in a low score in this category.

No mention of green procurement criteria
No social responsibility aspects included

Strengths

Detailed and clear description of services and client
Comprehensive technical and regulatory requirements listed
Clear CPV code and estimated value provided
Fairness in objective criteria and open market approach

Concerns

Illogical and identical Submission Deadline and Contract Start Date
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Absence of information on e-submission and document access
No sustainability or innovation considerations

Recommendations

1. Correct the submission deadline and contract start date to be logically sequential.
2. Provide explicit evaluation criteria for bidders to understand scoring.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide direct links to tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline