Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Co-op Academy North Manchester - Replacement 3G Pitches and associated works

Closed

Updated October 09, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
006071-2026
Value
£180,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
October 04, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 19, 2026

Key facts

Estimated value
£180,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
77320000 — Sports fields maintenance services
Procedure
Open procedure
Lots
Divided into lots
Budget
£180,000
Duration
2 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
58
Quality Score/100
Fair

Original Tender Description

Renewal of 3G pitch surface and floodlights at Co-op Academy North Manchester. Area – 102m x 63m. Scope of Works: 1. Preliminaries & Site Establishment 2. Site Clearance 3. Supply and Install 3G Synthetic Turf 4. Reinstatement 5. Testing and Commissioning 6. A suitable warranty to be provided for the pitch. 7. New goals and nets to be provided 8. Replacement of damaged LED floodlight panels.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (10)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Submit bids by 2026-03-06T15:00:00+00:00.
--Submit bids via the MultiQuote platform.
--Propose a solution for the renewal of a 3G pitch surface and floodlights.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Based on the provided information, no specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Based on the provided information, no specific eligibility requirements (e.g., legal form, registration) are detailed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS10
--Ability to perform Preliminaries & Site Establishment.
--Ability to perform Site Clearance.
--Capability to Supply and Install 3G Synthetic Turf.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Ability to undertake a contract with an estimated value of 180,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
006071-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data for a tender by The Co-operative Academy of Manchester for the renewal of a 3G pitch surface and floodlights, detailing the scope of works including turf installation, reinstatement, testing, warranty, new goals, and floodlight panel replacement.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
006071-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS data package provides information on the tender for the renewal of a 3G pitch surface and floodlights at Co-op Academy North Manchester, detailing buyer information and tender initiation.

Official PDF VersionPDF
006071-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the renewal of a 3G pitch surface and floodlights at Co-op Academy North Manchester, detailing the scope of works, estimated value, contract dates, and submission deadlines via MultiQuote.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

58
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender for 3G pitch renewal is clear in its scope but suffers from significant deficiencies in legal compliance, clarity, completeness, and fairness due to missing critical information such as evaluation criteria and detailed eligibility requirements.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance60/100

The tender lacks detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and crucially, evaluation criteria, which are fundamental for compliance with transparency principles, even for below-threshold procedures. Missing reveal date and procedure codes are minor issues.

•Absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds
•Absence of detailed eligibility requirements
Clarity60/100

While the description and scope of works are very clear, the absence of evaluation criteria makes it unclear how bids will be assessed. The lack of detailed eligibility and exclusion requirements also reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

•Absence of evaluation criteria
•Lack of detailed eligibility and exclusion requirements
Completeness55/100

Basic information is mostly present, but the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion/eligibility requirements. The liable person and procedure codes are also missing.

•Absence of evaluation criteria
•Absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness50/100

The most significant fairness concern is the complete absence of evaluation criteria, which renders the procurement process opaque and potentially subjective. While e-submission is supported and value is disclosed, this critical omission severely undermines transparency and equal treatment.

•Absence of evaluation criteria, severely impacting transparency and objectivity
Practicality80/100

Electronic submission via the MultiQuote platform is supported, and key dates (contract start, duration) are clearly specified. The estimated value is provided. A direct document URL is not explicitly stated but documents are available.

•No explicit document URL provided in the basic information
Data Consistency60/100

A significant inconsistency exists in the estimated value, with the basic information stating 180,000.00 EUR and a document summary mentioning £150,000. Minor inconsistencies include missing liable person and procedure codes.

•Inconsistent estimated value/currency (£150,000 vs. 180,000 EUR)
•Missing liable person
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which typically implies higher sustainability standards.

•No explicit sustainability (green, social, innovation) criteria

Strengths

Clear description and scope of works
Electronic submission supported via MultiQuote platform
Key contract dates and duration are specified
Estimated value is disclosed
Documents are available and summarized

Concerns

Absence of evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed mandatory exclusion and eligibility requirements
Inconsistent estimated value/currency information
Missing liable person and procedure type codes
No explicit sustainability or innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish clear and objective evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and transparency.
2. Provide detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements for all bidders.
3. Clarify and correct the discrepancy in the estimated value and currency (£ vs EUR).

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes