Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction of social services premises at Zemgales Street 31, Olaine

Closed

Updated October 14, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
January 28, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
163230
Value
€130,000
Location
Pieriga, Latvia
Published
January 12, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

January 21, 2026

Submission Deadline

January 28, 2026

Tender Opening

January 28, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€130,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
45000000 — Construction work
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€130,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Pieriga
Type
Construction
68
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of social services premises at Zemgales Street 31, Olaine
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Submit applicant's application forms.
--Submit financial turnover statements.
--Submit documentation of experience with client references.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Provide documentation of experience with client references.
--Provide information on key specialists.
--Submit a technical proposal using specified templates.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit financial turnover statements.
--Submit a financial proposal using specified templates.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

BūvprojektsDOC
Būvprojekts -- 30.0 MB

Document: Būvprojekts. AI analysis could not be completed.

Darbu daudzumu sarakstsDOC
Darbu daudzumu saraksts -- 74.4 KB

Document: Darbu daudzumu saraksts. AI analysis could not be completed.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaDOC
Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija -- 102.2 KB

This tender document outlines the comprehensive requirements for the reconstruction of social service premises in Olaine. It details mandatory submission documents, including applicant's application forms, financial turnover statements, experience with client references, and information on key specialists. Bidders must also submit a technical and financial proposal using specified templates. The evaluation criteria prioritize economic advantageousness, allocating 90 points for the lowest price and up to 10 points for adherence to socially responsible procurement principles, specifically the employment of vulnerable groups.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums -- 207.1 KB

Document: Nolikums. AI analysis could not be completed.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

68
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is critically deficient due to the complete absence of accessible tender documents and essential legal and evaluation criteria, severely hindering transparent and fair competition. While social criteria are included, the overall quality of the procurement process is significantly compromised by the lack of documentation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

Significant concerns arise from the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements in the provided extract. This suggests a potential non-compliance with national and EU procurement regulations, which typically mandate these elements. The lack of full tender documents prevents a comprehensive legal assessment.

•Absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
•Absence of explicit eligibility requirements
Clarity40/100

The tender's clarity is severely compromised by the lack of accessible tender documents. While basic information is provided, the absence of detailed specifications, terms, and conditions makes it impossible for potential bidders to fully understand the project scope and requirements. The broad CPV code also reduces clarity for searchability.

•No accessible tender documents
•Broad CPV code (7)
Completeness83/100

The tender is highly incomplete. Critical components such as full tender documents, detailed technical specifications, complete legal requirements (exclusion grounds, eligibility criteria), and comprehensive evaluation criteria are missing from the provided information. This makes it impossible for a bidder to prepare a compliant and competitive offer.

•Absence of full tender documents
•Missing detailed technical specifications
Fairness60/100

The fairness of the procurement process is significantly undermined by the lack of accessible tender documents and missing evaluation criteria. Without transparent and complete information, potential bidders cannot prepare offers on an equal footing, leading to a non-transparent and potentially unfair competition. The absence of explicit mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds further exacerbates this concern.

•Lack of accessible tender documents
•Missing comprehensive evaluation criteria
Practicality40/100

The practicality for potential bidders is extremely low due to the complete absence of accessible tender documents. It is practically impossible for any interested party to prepare a compliant and informed bid without access to the full tender specifications, drawings, terms, and conditions.

•Inability for bidders to prepare offers without accessible documents
Data Consistency100/100

There is a minor inconsistency between the automated check's 'No social criteria' flag and the explicit mention of socially responsible procurement principles (employment of vulnerable groups) in the extracted requirements. The extracted requirements clearly indicate the inclusion of social criteria. Otherwise, the provided basic data is consistent.

•Contradiction between automated check and extracted requirements regarding social criteria
Sustainability25/100

The tender demonstrates a positive commitment to social sustainability by explicitly including criteria for the employment of vulnerable groups, offering up to 10 evaluation points. However, there is no mention of environmental sustainability criteria (green procurement), which is a missed opportunity, especially for a works contract.

•Absence of explicit environmental sustainability (green procurement) criteria

Strengths

Clear project title, reference, organization, and description
Open procedure, promoting competition
Value and contract duration are disclosed
Inclusion of social criteria (employment of vulnerable groups) with evaluation points
EU Funded, indicating potential for broader oversight

Concerns

No accessible tender documents, making it impossible for bidders to prepare offers and for the process to be transparent
Absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, raising significant legal compliance and fairness issues
Missing comprehensive evaluation criteria, hindering transparency and fairness
Broad CPV code (7) and missing NUTS code, impacting clarity and searchability
Absence of explicit environmental sustainability (green procurement) criteria

Recommendations

1. Immediately ensure all comprehensive tender documents, including detailed specifications, terms, conditions, and evaluation criteria, are publicly accessible.
2. Clearly state all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements in accordance with national and EU public procurement laws.
3. Refine the CPV code to be more specific to renovation works and include the NUTS code for better geographical identification.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes