Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Sanitary servicing of public toilets owned by Riga City Municipality

Closed

Updated October 09, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
167212
Value
€139,999
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 03, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Financial OfferPrice
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 23, 2026

Tender Opening

March 23, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€139,999
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
90900000 — Cleaning and sanitation services
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€139,999
Duration
12 months
Location
Riga
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€336,807
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
3,844 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Sanitary servicing of public toilets owned by Riga City Municipality

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender presents a straightforward service contract for public toilet sanitation in Riga. The lack of detailed evaluation criteria and specific requirements suggests a focus on price and basic service delivery. Winning requires a highly competitive price, demonstrable reliability, and a clear understanding of operational efficiency.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Efficient Sanitation Services at a Competitive Price

Proven Operational Excellence in Public Facility Management

Commitment to Maintaining Public Hygiene Standards in Riga

Key Opportunities
Potential for price-based advantage due to lack of detailed evaluation criteria.
Opportunity to differentiate through operational efficiency and service quality, even if not explicitly weighted.
Leveraging existing infrastructure and local knowledge in Riga to offer cost-effective solutions.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid strategy beyond price.

Assume price is the primary driver, but also emphasize reliability and operational robustness in the narrative to build confidence.

Potential for many bidders due to low barriers to entry (no explicit eligibility/technical requirements detailed).

Focus on a highly competitive price and ensure all submission requirements are met flawlessly to avoid disqualification.

The estimated value is relatively low (139,999.0 EUR), suggesting a focus on cost-effectiveness over premium service.

Develop a lean operational model that allows for aggressive pricing while maintaining essential service standards.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established cleaning and facility management company with proven experience in public sector contracts, a strong operational base in Riga, and a highly efficient cost structure. The ideal bidder will have robust quality control processes and a track record of reliable service delivery.
Key Requirements
Submission by deadline: 2026-03-23T10:30:00
Accurate completion of the financial offer template (monthly service, cleaning materials)
Adherence to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' (Requirements for the subject of procurement)
Key Discriminators
Highly competitive pricing achieved through optimized operational processes and bulk purchasing of cleaning materials.
Demonstrated experience in managing similar public contracts with a focus on reliability and minimal disruption.
A clear and concise operational plan that highlights efficiency and proactive maintenance.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, consider a subtle commitment to employing local staff or offering training opportunities to demonstrate community engagement, which can be a positive implicit factor.
Bid Focus Areas
PriceN/A (assumed high)

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify areas for efficiency gains. Benchmark against similar contracts if possible. Offer a price that is highly competitive but sustainable.

Service Delivery (Implicit)N/A (assumed high)

Clearly articulate the service plan, emphasizing frequency, quality control, and responsiveness. Highlight experience in similar environments.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price the Offer
CriticalMed effort

Given the lack of detailed evaluation criteria and the relatively low estimated value, the financial offer will likely be the most significant factor. Conduct a detailed cost breakdown to ensure a competitive yet sustainable price.

Significantly increases the chance of winning if price is the primary evaluation metric.
Meticulously Complete Financial Offer Template
CriticalLow effort

Ensure all fields in the provided financial offer template are accurately completed, including pricing for monthly service and cleaning materials. Any errors or omissions could lead to disqualification.

Ensures compliance and avoids immediate rejection.
Develop a Concise and Efficient Operational Plan
HighMed effort

While not explicitly requested, a brief, clear operational plan highlighting efficiency, route optimization, and quality control measures will build confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver reliable service.

Demonstrates competence and reliability beyond just price.
Anticipate Competitor Pricing
HighMed effort

Research potential competitors and their likely pricing strategies. Aim to undercut them while maintaining profitability, potentially by leveraging economies of scale or optimized logistics.

Helps in setting a winning price point.
Highlight Local Presence and Responsiveness
MediumLow effort

Emphasize any existing operational presence or teams within Riga. This can imply faster response times and better understanding of local needs, even if not a formal requirement.

Adds a layer of perceived value and reliability.
Subtly Mention Local Employment
LowLow effort

If feasible, include a brief statement about commitment to local employment or training within the bid narrative, despite 'Social Aspects: No'. This can be a positive implicit factor.

May offer a slight positive impression without violating tender terms.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on essential hygiene standards, backed by proven operational efficiency and reliability.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Offers must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-23T10:30:00.
--A financial offer template is provided, including pricing for monthly service and cleaning materials.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are detailed in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements are detailed in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167212_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260303134150.pdf -- 98.8 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the sanitary servicing of public toilets owned by the Riga City Municipality.

Nolikums un tā pielikumiDOC
7.pielikums_Finanšu piedāvājums_03.03.2026_AP... -- 75.2 KB

This document contains a financial offer template for public toilet sanitary servicing, including pricing for monthly service and cleaning materials.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for public toilet sanitary servicing by Riga City Municipality is largely well-structured, with good clarity and data consistency, but lacks detail in crucial requirement areas and has limited sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender exhibits reasonable deadlines and a clear open procedure. The CPV code is provided, and there are no immediate indicators of disputes or non-compliance with standard procurement regulations, though detailed legal requirements are not explicitly provided.

Clarity80/100

The title and basic information are clear. The existence of a technical specification document implies detailed requirements, but their content is not fully accessible or described. Criteria for evaluation are notably absent, impacting overall clarity.

•Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as the estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines are present. However, crucial details regarding mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, and financial requirements are not explicitly detailed in the provided text, relying heavily on attached documents.

•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed
•No specific eligibility requirements are detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, and the estimated value is disclosed. The deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure. The reliance on attached documents for key requirements raises concerns about full document access without additional steps, although the core tender notice is accessible.

•Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

While described as e-procurement, the specific mechanism for e-submission and document URLs are not detailed in the provided text. The contract start date is implied but not explicitly stated. Financing information and duration are specified.

•No e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference number, organization, and dates are populated logically. The tender is active with no stated suspensions or disputes, indicating good internal consistency within the provided data.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the tender details. It is also not indicated as being EU funded.

•Not green procurement
•No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Reasonable submission deadline
Estimated value disclosed
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of detail on exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Potential restricted document access
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clearly specify evaluation criteria within the main tender document or accessible summary.
2. Provide a summary or preview of key requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) to improve initial clarity and accessibility.
3. Incorporate elements of green or social procurement to enhance sustainability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes