Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Renovation of the access road and construction of a car parking lot at the multi-apartment residential building at Vidzemes Street 24, Balvi

Closed

Updated October 14, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
January 22, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
163128
Value
€25,000
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
January 07, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 07, 2026

Deadline for Questions

January 15, 2026

Submission Deadline

January 22, 2026

Tender Opening

January 22, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€25,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
45223300 — Parking lot construction work
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€25,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Riga
Type
Construction
67
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of the access road and construction of a car parking lot at the multi-apartment residential building at Vidzemes Street 24, Balvi

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-01-22 10:00:00.
--No variants or alternative bids will be accepted.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No mandatory exclusion grounds are specified in the provided tender summary.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidding company must be legally registered.
--The bidding company must be registered as a construction merchant.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bidder must employ or have access to a certified road construction specialist.
--The bidder must demonstrate proven experience in asphalt concrete works.
--The bidder must commit to completing the works within a 3-month term.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must submit a financial proposal.
--The financial proposal must be competitive, as selection is based on the lowest price.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaDOC
Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija

This document outlines the comprehensive requirements for participation in the tender for road renovation and parking lot construction at Vidzemes iela 24, Balvi. It details mandatory qualification criteria, including company and construction merchant registration, the necessity of a certified road construction specialist, and proven experience in asphalt concrete works. Bidders must commit to a 3-month completion term and a 36-month warranty, with the selection based on the lowest price financial proposal.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
Nolikums ar pielikumiem

Document: Nolikums ar pielikumiem. AI analysis could not be completed.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

67
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender outlines a straightforward road construction project, but the complete absence of accessible tender documents severely hinders a comprehensive quality assessment and raises significant transparency concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

Based on the summary, basic legal requirements like company registration are mentioned. However, the lack of full tender documents makes it impossible to verify complete compliance with procurement laws, especially regarding detailed procedures and evaluation criteria. The absence of specified mandatory exclusion grounds in the summary is a notable omission.

•No mandatory exclusion grounds specified in the provided tender summary (potential omission or lack of detail)
•Inability to verify full legal compliance due to missing tender documents.
Clarity40/100

The tender's title, description, and extracted requirements are clear in their summary form. However, without detailed specifications, drawings, or full instructions in actual tender documents, bidders cannot fully understand the scope, technical requirements, or expected quality standards.

•Lack of detailed specifications and instructions due to missing tender documents
•Potential for ambiguity without full documentation.
Completeness83/100

The tender information is critically incomplete due to the complete absence of any attached documents. Essential details for bidders, such as full terms and conditions, detailed technical specifications, and submission forms, are missing.

•Complete absence of tender documents (specifications, terms, conditions, forms)
•Missing detailed evaluation criteria beyond 'lowest price'
Fairness60/100

The lack of accessible tender documents severely compromises fairness and equal treatment among potential bidders, as they cannot prepare competitive bids without full information. The technical requirements (certified specialist, proven experience, 36-month warranty) appear reasonable for the project scope, but their proportionality cannot be fully assessed without context. The 'lowest price' criterion is simple but may not guarantee best value without clear quality standards.

•Lack of equal access to information for all potential bidders due to missing documents
•Risk of unfair competition due to incomplete tender details.
Practicality40/100

The project scope and duration (3 months) seem practical. However, the absence of full tender documents makes it highly impractical for bidders to prepare a compliant, accurate, and competitive financial proposal. The lack of e-submission may also add administrative burden.

•Impractical for bidders to prepare accurate bids without full tender documents
•No e-submission option specified, which can hinder practicality for bidders.
Data Consistency100/100

The provided summary data appears internally consistent, with the title matching the description. However, full data consistency cannot be verified without access to the complete tender documents.

•Consistency cannot be fully verified without access to the complete tender documents.
Sustainability0/100

No sustainability aspects, such as green procurement or social criteria, are mentioned or required. This represents a missed opportunity for the contracting authority to promote broader public policy objectives.

•No green procurement criteria specified
•No social criteria specified.

Strengths

Clear title and description of the works.
Estimated value is disclosed, promoting transparency.
Open procedure encourages broader competition.
Specific technical requirements (certified specialist, experience, warranty) are outlined in the summary.

Concerns

Complete absence of tender documents, severely impacting transparency and fairness.
Restricted document access, as flagged by automated checks.
Missing detailed evaluation criteria beyond 'lowest price'.
No mandatory exclusion grounds specified in the summary.
No e-submission option mentioned, potentially increasing administrative burden.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all tender documents (specifications, drawings, forms, full terms and conditions) to ensure transparency and equal access for all bidders.
2. Clearly define and publish all mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed evaluation criteria to ensure legal compliance and fair assessment.
3. Consider implementing e-submission for increased efficiency and accessibility for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes