Adaptation of premises to increase the accessibility of community-based social services at Bānīša iela 4, Dundaga – development of construction design documentation, construction works and author supervision

This tender for construction works and design documentation is well-structured in its basic information, but suffers from critical deficiencies in transparency and completeness due to restricted document access and the absence of specified evaluation criteria.

The tender defines a clear open procedure, assigns an appropriate CPV code, and provides a reasonable submission period. However, the 'Restricted document access' raises concerns regarding full compliance with public procurement transparency requirements, although the specific nature of the restriction is not detailed.

While the project description and technical capability requirements are clear, the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant flaw. This lack of transparency on how bids will be assessed severely impacts the clarity for potential bidders.

The tender provides essential information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location. However, the 'Restricted document access' and the critical omission of evaluation criteria mean that key information is not fully available or defined for bidders. The AI summary also indicates a lack of detailed eligibility, exclusion, and financial requirements in the provided summaries, which should ideally be readily accessible.

The tender's fairness is severely compromised by the 'Restricted document access' and the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria. These issues prevent equal and transparent access to information and an objective understanding of the bidding process, despite the value being disclosed and deadlines being reasonable.

The tender benefits from being EU Funded and specifying a clear contract duration. It also indicates 'E-Procurement' and an electronic opening place, suggesting electronic submission is supported, despite a contradictory automated check result. However, the 'Restricted document access' hinders practical access to necessary documents, and the contract start date is not provided.

Key dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, there is an inconsistency between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' automated check result. The absence of specified evaluation criteria also represents a gap in consistent data provision.

While the project's objective to increase accessibility for social services is inherently beneficial, the tender documentation itself does not explicitly include green procurement, social criteria for bidders, or innovation focus, as indicated by automated checks. The EU funding characteristic is a positive, but does not substitute for specific sustainability requirements within the tender.