Skip to main content
Tenders

Finsley Gate 2 & 4 Car Parks, Burnley - Surfacing Improvements

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
018774-2026
Value
£60,000
Location
Lancashire, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 03, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£60,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Lancashire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Tenders are invited for the re-surfacing and re-configuration of Finsley Gate 2 & 4 Car Parks.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for car park surfacing improvements is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified procedure and CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure is 'Below threshold - open competition', which is a standard approach for this value.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is concise and understandable. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed by bidders. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it unclear how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, value, and duration. However, the crucial 'Tender Documents' section indicates 'Documents with content/summaries: 0', suggesting that the detailed tender documents are not readily accessible or summarized within the notice itself, which is a significant omission.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and criteria are generally objective, although specific evaluation criteria are missing. The lack of explicit mention of e-procurement is a minor concern for modern standards.

Practicality65/100

The contract start and submission deadlines are provided. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The lack of explicit mention of e-submission is a drawback, as is the absence of document content, which hinders practical assessment by potential bidders.

No e-submission mentioned
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical and sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This lack of sustainability considerations is a notable area for improvement.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Disclosed estimated value and duration
Standard open competition procedure
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of sustainability considerations
No explicit mention of e-submission

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria to guide bidders.
2. Provide accessible content or summaries for all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline