Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Grading services in Saulkrasti Municipality in 2026

Closed

Updated October 09, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
168596
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Pieriga, Latvia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
50230000 — Repair, maintenance and associated services related to roads and other equipment
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Pieriga
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€82,313
Avg. Bids
1.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
4,915 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Grading services in Saulkrasti Municipality in 2026

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for road grading services in Saulkrasti municipality presents a strong opportunity for experienced local or regional contractors. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria necessitates a focus on demonstrating superior technical capability, cost-effectiveness, and a commitment to operational excellence, as outlined in the provided documentation. Proactive engagement and meticulous adherence to submission requirements will be crucial for success.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and efficient grading services tailored to Saulkrasti's specific road network.

Commitment to operational excellence and transparent reporting.

Cost-effective solution ensuring optimal road maintenance.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for a strong focus on demonstrating technical superiority and operational efficiency.
Detailed 'Ceļu un ielu saraksts' provides an opportunity to showcase in-depth knowledge of the local road network and tailor service delivery.
The requirement for a specific work log format allows for demonstrating organized and transparent project management.
Key Challenges
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult to precisely target bid optimization.

Focus on demonstrating best-in-class performance across all stated requirements, assuming the contracting authority will prioritize reliability, technical capability, and adherence to specifications.

Estimated value not disclosed may indicate a tight budget or a desire for competitive pricing, requiring a highly cost-conscious approach.

Develop a detailed cost breakdown demonstrating efficiency and value for money, potentially offering tiered pricing or value-added services if feasible.

The tender is for a specific year (2026), implying a need for immediate readiness and operational capacity.

Clearly articulate the bidder's current capacity and readiness to commence services promptly in 2026, highlighting existing resources and operational plans.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced local or regional contractor with a proven track record in municipal road maintenance and grading services. The ideal bidder possesses a modern, well-maintained fleet of grading equipment, a skilled workforce familiar with Saulkrasti's road network, and robust operational processes for logging and reporting. They should also be adept at cost management and possess the capacity to deliver high-quality services efficiently.
Key Requirements
Ability to provide grading services as described in the tender.
Compliance with regulations in the 'Nolikums' document.
Utilization of roads and streets listed in the 'Ceļu un ielu saraksts' document.
Use of a work log similar to the 'Darbu žurnāls Paraugs' sample.
Submission according to requirements in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience with similar municipal road grading projects in Latvia, specifically within the LV007 NUTS region.
A highly detailed and practical approach to the 'Darbu žurnāls' demonstrating superior record-keeping and transparency.
A proactive proposal that anticipates potential challenges within the Saulkrasti road network and offers solutions.
A modern and well-maintained fleet of grading equipment, potentially with fuel efficiency data.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider including a commitment to local employment or training opportunities within the Saulkrasti municipality, even if not a formal evaluation point. This can subtly enhance the bidder's profile.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (Grading Services)

Provide detailed descriptions of grading methodologies, equipment specifications, and team qualifications. Reference past successful projects of similar scope and complexity. Emphasize efficiency and quality of finish.

Compliance with 'Nolikums' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības'

Meticulously review and address every point within these documents. Ensure all required forms and information are submitted accurately and on time. Highlight any specific certifications or accreditations that demonstrate compliance.

Understanding of 'Ceļu un ielu saraksts'

Demonstrate a thorough understanding of the listed roads and streets, their characteristics, and maintenance classes. Outline how the grading strategy will be adapted to different road types and conditions within the municipality.

Work Log ('Darbu žurnāls')

Present a clear, organized, and user-friendly sample work log that aligns with the provided example. Highlight features that ensure accuracy, detail, and ease of reporting for the contracting authority.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Analyze 'Nolikums' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības'
CriticalHigh effort

These documents are foundational. Conduct a detailed clause-by-clause review to ensure full comprehension and compliance. Any deviation or omission could lead to disqualification.

Ensures bid eligibility and adherence to procedural requirements.
Assume Technical Capability and Operational Efficiency are Key
CriticalMed effort

Given the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, assume the contracting authority will prioritize a bidder's ability to perform the service effectively and efficiently. Focus on showcasing a modern fleet, experienced personnel, and robust operational processes.

Maximizes perceived value and reliability, even without explicit weighting.
Demonstrate Local Knowledge and Network Familiarity
HighMed effort

Leverage the 'Ceļu un ielu saraksts' to show an intimate understanding of Saulkrasti's road network. Detail how grading will be adapted to specific road types and conditions within the municipality.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver tailored and effective services.
Develop a Detailed and Transparent Work Log Sample
HighMed effort

Go beyond the sample by creating a comprehensive work log that includes all necessary details for effective project tracking and reporting, such as timestamps, personnel involved, materials used, and specific tasks performed.

Enhances perceived professionalism, accountability, and transparency.
Proactively Address Potential Cost Sensitivities
MediumMed effort

Since the estimated value is not disclosed, prepare a cost proposal that is competitive yet sustainable. Highlight cost-saving measures or efficiencies achieved through your operational model.

Increases the likelihood of the bid being financially attractive.
Consider Local Employment Commitment
LowLow effort

While not a formal requirement, a brief mention of a commitment to utilizing local labor or engaging with local suppliers can be a subtle differentiator.

Can positively influence perception without significant bid modification.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and technically proficient option for Saulkrasti municipality, emphasizing a deep understanding of local needs and a commitment to high-quality, efficient service delivery. Highlight operational transparency through detailed work logs and reporting.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit proposals according to the requirements in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
--Bidders must adhere to the submission procedures outlined in the "Nolikums" document.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-02T11:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds mentioned in the provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be able to provide greiderēšanas (grading) services.
--Bidders must comply with the regulations outlined in the "Nolikums" document.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be able to perform grading services as described in the tender.
--Bidders must be able to utilize the roads and streets listed in the "Ceļu un ielu saraksts" document.
--Bidders must be able to use a work log similar to the "Darbu žurnāls Paraugs" sample.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are mentioned in the provided summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168596_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260318161003.pdf -- 96.1 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning greiderēšanas (grading) services in Saulkrasti municipality for the year 2026, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and other necessary documents.

Darbu žurnāls ParaugsXLS
1. pielikums TS Darbu žurnāls_Paraugs.xlsx -- 10.1 KB

This document contains a sample work log for February 2026, detailing dates, street names, work titles, lengths, quantities, prices, and materials used.

Ceļu un ielu sarakstsXLS
Lēmuma pielik_LVC Saulkrastu_pagasta_celi (1)... -- 41.4 KB

This document contains a list of roads and streets belonging to the Saulkrasti municipality, detailing their characteristics, cadastral information, and maintenance classes.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums Greiderēšana 2026.docx -- 96.1 KB

This document contains the regulations for a tender process for gritting services in Saulkrasti municipality in 2026, outlining the subject of the procurement, the contracting authority, submission procedures, and evaluation criteria.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road grading services in Saulkrasti municipality is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, along with potential document access restrictions, slightly impacts its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable. The absence of disclosed disputes and the active status contribute positively. However, the lack of explicit mention of regulatory compliance beyond the 'Nolikums' document and the potential for restricted document access could be a minor concern.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, and the requirements are documented in attached files ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija', 'Nolikums', 'Darbu žurnāls Paraugs'). The list of roads is also provided. The main area for improvement is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which impacts the clarity of how bids will be assessed.

•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and type of service. Deadlines and the duration of the contract (implied by '2026 gadā') are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

•Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability are outlined. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and there are concerns about restricted document access, which could hinder full document access for all potential bidders.

•Restricted document access
•Value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a clear submission deadline. It is an e-procurement process. However, the lack of explicit financing information and the absence of a specified contract start date (beyond the year 2026) reduce its practicality.

•No e-submission (implied by 'E-Procurement' characteristic but not explicitly stated as e-submission)
•Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The CPV code is provided. The consistency is high.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

•Not green procurement
•No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of services
Well-defined eligibility and technical requirements
Active e-procurement process
Reasonable submission deadline

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the contract.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes