Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Use of EO data to calculate severe weather thresholds

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
028551-2026
Value
£25,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 27, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 19, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£25,000
Duration
4 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Joint Nature Conservation Committee The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) is the statutory adviser to the UK Government and devolved administrations on UK and international nature conservation Project Aims The overarching aim of this project is to develop an improved approach for using Earth Observation (EO) or other publicly accessible data to demonstrate whether ground at a specific location is frozen or has snow cover, with a reasonable level of accuracy and consistency. To achieve this the project will need to explore data available, issues regarding its use for this purpose, and comparative results from trialling different approaches. A secondary aim of this project is to provide JNCC with confidence that the proposed method is effective, and equipping JNCC with evidence that outcomes resulting from use of the approach are robust to stand up to potential challenge. Project Background JNCC runs the 'Severe Weather Scheme' (SWS), to provide a trusted mechanism to advise on the restriction of shooting of wildfowl and waders for conservation purposes during extended periods of severe weather, specifically when ground is frozen or snow covered. During such periods birds are naturally more vulnerable as it is harder for them to feed, whilst at the same time their energy requirements for survival are high. JNCC runs the scheme in collaboration and consultation with the country nature conservation bodies, environmental NGOs and shooting organisations. Information from the scheme is used to inform the Secretary of State, who has the power to impose a statutory suspension of shooting activities in all or part of GB under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 Section 2(6). The Severe Weather Scheme monitors temperatures annually to determine if a suspension of shooting activities is advised. The scheme runs during the open season for shooting any of the relevant species, i.e. the period from 7th November to 20th February. In addition to providing information to inform statutory suspensions of shooting, the scheme also advises wildfowlers on 'voluntary restraint of shooting' and wider guidance on activities that could disturb birds such as watersports and dog walking. The SWS has been running since the early 1980s. Criteria as to what severity of freezing weather should trigger voluntary restraint or a statutory suspension was originally agreed by a working group comprised of ornithological and data experts from the British government's nature conservation advisory body, and non-governmental organisations representing shooting and conservation interest. The agreed criteria relied on manual daily checks at a selection of weather stations as to whether ground was frozen or covered in snow. In 2001, with increasing automation of weather stations, the manual checks were replaced with automated temperature threshold readouts of grass and air temperature, as a proxy to indicate frozen or snow covered ground. For many years the SWS has operated using these data provided by the Met Office, but the Met Office are now stopping the provision of these data, so an alternative approach is required. JNCC has done some preliminary light touch investigation of the feasibility of using data from Earth Observation (EO) and other sources as an alternative to data collected in situ by a network of Met Office ground weather stations. JNCC has piloted use of EU METOSAT Land Surface Temperature (LST) data in combination with Met Office forecast air temperature, but has noticed accuracy and consistency issues in the approach trialled. JNCC's initial investigations will be provided to the successful contractor to consider and inform their review and further investigation. Specific details of the criteria currently used in the SWS are available on the JNCC website. In essence, the SWS may trigger a shooting suspension - either voluntary or statutory - based on whether more than half of a network of weather stations in England/Wales (considered as a single unit) and/or Scotland report 'frozen' conditions (i.e. grass temperature below -2°C and air temperature below 1°C) for a set number of consecutive days or more, allowing for some short periods of thaw in between. Knowledge and experience of EO datasets and data processing is essential for this contract. Ornithological expertise is less important, noting that we are not proposing changing the core criteria of what would trigger action, merely focussed on investigating alternative options for how we judge if the criteria have been met. JNCC can provide the limited ornithological input that may be relevant to consider, for example on the optimal geographic locations to consider to replace the existing weather station network. The total budget available for this project including VAT is £25,000. Project Objectives Objective 1 - Reviewing data sources To review data sources that are available to meet the project aim. The data sources must have the following features: • Effective in assessing ground state: Currently the scheme uses data for both air temperature and grass/ground temperature as a proxy for frozen or snow covered ground to achieve this robust assessment. Data sources may replace this information or include other relevant metrics. • Low cost: The data sources must be easily obtainable at low cost or free at point of access. • Timeliness: Data relating to the state of the ground that morning or over the course of the previous night should ideally be available before 10:00 each day to facilitate timely decision-making. The current scheme requires continuous recordings of night-time temperatures specifically between 21:00 each night to 09:00 the following morning. • Location: The scheme must provide localised data covering England, Wales and Scotland. The existing SWS uses point locations at a network of Met Office weather stations currently used in the scheme, but there is flexibility around this going forwards. • Transparent: Since the outcomes from this scheme may influence legislative action, it is important that the data it is based on is from a trusted/transparent source and open to scrutiny. Ideally the data would be in the public domain, or at least available to the public at low cost. • Archival capability: Data must be archived for reference. We note, that JNCC has considered the option of setting up a new manual scheme using volunteers or contractors to take manual ground state observations daily through the season, but has ruled this out due to issues such as the cost and risk of data disruption (e.g. if volunteers were ill). Objective 2 - Trialling and evaluating approaches To trial use of the most promising data source(s) and evaluate how effective they are at assessing the state of the ground, and how similar the outcomes for the SWS would be. Data from the current scheme is available for use in back casting comparisons. Project Objectives: Detailed Tasks Objective 1 detailed tasks: A light touch literate review is required. The search strategy and information to be recorded from each paper or data sources should be proposed to JNCC at the start-up meeting, for input and agreement, before work commences. JNCC will provide the successful bidder with their initial scoping work to build on. It would also be welcomed if the contractor could draw on their own expert EO knowledge. Where possible, the review methodology should align with the 'quick scoping review' and/or 'rapid evidence review' guidance provided at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-production-of-quick-scoping-reviews-and-rapid-evidence-assessments The list of papers and data sources screened, included/excluded, and any relevant raw notes relating to each paper reviewed should be shared as an output. In addition, findings should be written up into a short summary that could be included within a technical report at a later date if required. Objective 2 detailed tasks: The contractor must carry out trials using data to evaluate the effectiveness of the most promising approach(s). The number of approaches to consider should be informed by the outcome of the literature review and the contractors expert opinion of the approaches that are most likely to be successful. The approaches to be considered should also be agreed with JNCC before detailed work commences. The contractor will need to familiarise themselves with the criteria used in the existing approach for the SWS and how it is applied. One approach is that alternative datasets will provide outputs that mimic the current criteria of grass temperature

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

21 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (11)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Search strategy and information to be recorded from each paper or data sources should be proposed to JNCC at the start-up meeting for input and agreement before work commences.
--List of papers and data sources screened, included/excluded, and any relevant raw notes relating to each paper reviewed should be shared as an output.
--Findings should be written up into a short summary that could be included within a technical report.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Knowledge and experience of EO datasets and data processing is essential.
--Ornithological expertise is less important, but JNCC can provide limited ornithological input.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS11
--Ability to review data sources for effectiveness in assessing ground state, low cost, timeliness, localized coverage (England, Wales, Scotland), transparency, and archival capability.
--Ability to trial and evaluate promising data sources and approaches for assessing ground state.
--Familiarity with the criteria used in the existing Severe Weather Scheme (SWS) and how it is applied.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Total budget available for this project including VAT is £25,000.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Earth Observation data analysis is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a defined budget. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on the submission process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations for below-threshold open competitions. The CPV code is provided, and the organization is clearly identified. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the project's scope. No disputes are indicated.

Clarity80/100

The project aims, background, and objectives are clearly articulated, providing a good understanding of the required work. Specific technical capabilities and requirements are detailed, making the scope of work understandable. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The description is detailed, and AI-extracted requirements cover technical and financial aspects. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds reduce completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, and the estimated value is disclosed. The requirements, particularly the emphasis on EO data and processing experience, are specific to the project's needs but do not appear to unfairly target a single company. The process is described as an open competition, suggesting a fair opportunity for bidders.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. The estimated value is provided, and the budget is clear. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents hinders practical access and submission. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the total budget.

No e-submission
Document URL missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and value are populated. Dates are logical, and the contract start date follows the submission deadline. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code is provided.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding. While the project's subject matter (environmental data) has indirect sustainability relevance, there are no specific sustainability criteria integrated into the procurement process.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project aims and background
Detailed technical requirements
Disclosed estimated value and budget
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
No e-submission specified
Potentially short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for proposals.
2. Provide direct links to tender documents and clarify the submission method (e-submission preferred).
3. Review and potentially extend the submission deadline to allow adequate preparation time.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline