Skip to main content
Tenders

4 year Framework Agreement for the provision of Landscape Architect services for new build housing

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
018156-2026
Value
£20,000,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Budget
£20,000,000
Duration
48 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Link is seeking to enter into a Framework Agreement with a maximum of five Landscape Architects Practices for the provision of Landscape Architect services for a four-year period. Successful Practices should be registered with the Landscape Institute (or the equivalent bodies within the country your organisation is registered). Link works in partnership with a number of subsidiary companies who will also be entitled to purchase services from the Framework Agreement. The subsidiaries of Link Group include C~urb 6 Ltd, Link Living, Horizon Housing Association Ltd, Larkfield Housing Association Ltd and West Highland Housing Association Ltd. Although it is possible that other organisations may join the Group, becoming subsidiary companies, during the term of the Framework Agreement, and may wish to "call off" from the Framework. Link also works in partnership with several external organisations, refer to Section 1.1 of the Contract Notice for further details, who will also be entitled to purchase services from the Framework Agreement. In addition, it is intended that any Registered Social Landlord registered and operating in Scotland will also be entitled to purchase services from the framework, subject to Link's prior agreement. There is no guarantee of any work. It is however, likely that individual commissions will be "called off" either by direct selection or by mini tendering, within the terms of the Framework Agreement, to identify the most economically advantageous tender. The location of projects will vary but in the main will be in the Central Belt of Scotland, Argyll & Bute and Highland. Commissions may however be located in any part of Scotland. The total number of housing units in each of the geographical areas may vary and no specific numbers can be guaranteed in any area or in total. Applicants should have experience of projects within the affordable housing sector for projects between 5 and 500 units including flats, houses and retirement living projects with a mix of tenures. Link is fully committed to producing housing developments of the highest design calibre and believes that the public realm plays a significant factor in the success of each development. We believe that external hard and soft landscaping is as important as the design and quality of the building and can produce both social and environmental benefits. Consequently, Link has taken a leading role in the development of proposals which see the Landscape Architect as fundamental and central to the master planning and external design process. Link is therefore looking for Landscape Architects with a similar ethos and capabilities who can demonstrate fully an ability to provide a range of services from site-wide master planning to the design and implementation of small intimate landscaping responses which will add value to the development and supplement the built environment. Link will expect the successful Landscape Architect Practices to deliver a high quality and value for money service.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 3 categories

Submission (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Bids will be assessed to identify the most economically advantageous tender, either by direct selection or by mini tendering within the terms of the Framework Agreement.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Successful Practices should be registered with the Landscape Institute (or the equivalent bodies within the country your organisation is registered).
--Applicants should have experience of projects within the affordable housing sector for projects between 5 and 500 units including flats, houses and retirement living projects with a mix of tenures.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Ability to provide a range of services from site-wide master planning to the design and implementation of small intimate landscaping responses.
--Demonstrate a similar ethos and capabilities to Link in producing housing developments of the highest design calibre, where the public realm plays a significant factor.
--Ability to deliver high quality and value for money service.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Landscape Architect services is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting its overall completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by specifying a CPV code, organization, and procedure type. The deadline, while potentially short, is provided. The absence of explicit dispute information is positive. However, the lack of a specified reveal date for submissions is a minor compliance oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of services required is clear, outlining the scope from master planning to implementation. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are well-defined. The objective of seeking high design calibre and value for money is evident. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed beyond 'most economically advantageous'.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The CPV code is provided. However, the critical issue of 'Documents with content/summaries: 0' significantly impacts completeness, as potential bidders cannot fully assess the scope and requirements without access to the tender documents. The submission deadline is provided, but the lack of a reveal date is a concern.

No document content available
Missing reveal date
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to a maximum of five practices, which is a reasonable limit for a framework agreement. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is a restricted one, which is standard. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability are objective. The use of e-procurement is noted. The potential for other organizations to join the group and call off services could be seen as a broad scope, but not inherently unfair.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive for practicality. The contract duration is clearly stated. However, the 'Issues: No e-submission' flag contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, creating confusion. Financing information and a clear contract start date are not explicitly provided, which could hinder practical planning for bidders.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline) are logical in relation to the tender publication date (implied by the year 2026).

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions the importance of social and environmental benefits from landscaping and a commitment to high design calibre. However, there are no explicit requirements or criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded, which limits the potential for specific sustainability mandates.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of required services
Well-defined eligibility and technical capability requirements
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Use of e-procurement noted

Concerns

No document content available for review
Missing evaluation criteria
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Provide access to all tender documents with clear summaries.
2. Specify detailed evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure it aligns with e-procurement.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline