Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.
PrisijungtiAtnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.
Prisijungti6 reikalavimų 3 kategorijose
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę
Šiam konkursui nėra apdorotų dokumentų.
Dokumentai čia pasirodys, kai tik jie bus atsisiųsti ir išanalizuoti.
This tender for Landscape Architect services is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting its overall completeness and fairness.
The tender adheres to general legal compliance by specifying a CPV code, organization, and procedure type. The deadline, while potentially short, is provided. The absence of explicit dispute information is positive. However, the lack of a specified reveal date for submissions is a minor compliance oversight.
The description of services required is clear, outlining the scope from master planning to implementation. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are well-defined. The objective of seeking high design calibre and value for money is evident. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed beyond 'most economically advantageous'.
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The CPV code is provided. However, the critical issue of 'Documents with content/summaries: 0' significantly impacts completeness, as potential bidders cannot fully assess the scope and requirements without access to the tender documents. The submission deadline is provided, but the lack of a reveal date is a concern.
The tender is open to a maximum of five practices, which is a reasonable limit for a framework agreement. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is a restricted one, which is standard. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability are objective. The use of e-procurement is noted. The potential for other organizations to join the group and call off services could be seen as a broad scope, but not inherently unfair.
The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive for practicality. The contract duration is clearly stated. However, the 'Issues: No e-submission' flag contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, creating confusion. Financing information and a clear contract start date are not explicitly provided, which could hinder practical planning for bidders.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline) are logical in relation to the tender publication date (implied by the year 2026).
The tender mentions the importance of social and environmental benefits from landscaping and a commitment to high design calibre. However, there are no explicit requirements or criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded, which limits the potential for specific sustainability mandates.
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę
Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes
Mūsų viešųjų pirkimų ekspertai parengia viską. Įrodytas sprendimas — jūs peržiūrit, patvirtinate ir pateikiate.
Sveiki! Aš esu jūsų AI asistentas, skirtas šiam konkursui. Galiu padėti jums suprasti reikalavimus, terminus, tinkamumo kriterijus ir pateikti strateginių įžvalgų.
Nereikia kreditinės kortelės