Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of a collaborative robot complex

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307784
Value
€100,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Collaborative robot complex100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€100,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€87,029
Avg. Bids
2.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
388 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of a collaborative robot complex
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for a collaborative robot complex is heavily weighted on price. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible compliant bid while ensuring a technically sound and compatible system. Demonstrating robust project management for the 4-month duration is also crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective, Compliant Collaborative Robot Solution

Seamless Integration and Deployment within 4 Months

Key Opportunities
Price is the sole evaluation criterion, offering a clear path to maximizing score by being the lowest bidder.
The tender is not divided into lots, simplifying the bid submission and management for a single supplier.
The relatively short 4-month duration suggests a need for efficient project execution and delivery.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% weight on cost.

Focus on lean operations, optimized supply chain, and potentially offering bundled services to reduce overall cost without compromising quality.

Ensuring absolute system and part compatibility as a single, non-divisible lot.

Thorough technical due diligence, detailed system architecture planning, and clear articulation of compatibility assurance in the technical description.

The absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and specific eligibility criteria requires careful interpretation of the Hankepass/ESPD and 'Vastavustingimused'.

Thorough review of all provided tender documents, including 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' and 'Vastavustingimused', and seeking clarification from the contracting authority if any ambiguity exists.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A supplier with a proven track record in providing collaborative robot systems, capable of offering competitive pricing and possessing strong technical expertise to ensure system compatibility. They should also have efficient project management capabilities to deliver within the 4-month timeframe.
Key Requirements
Technical description of the collaborative robot complex, ensuring system and part compatibility.
Lowest bid price for the collaborative robot complex, including delivery, installation, and training.
Confirmation of meeting contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements (via Hankepass/ESPD).
Confirmation of compliance with sanctions.
Indication of business secrets.
Key Discriminators
The most aggressive and sustainable pricing strategy that still allows for profitable delivery.
A highly detailed and convincing technical description that explicitly addresses system and part compatibility, potentially including case studies of similar integrated systems.
Demonstrated ability to deliver within the tight 4-month timeframe, perhaps through a clear project plan and resource allocation.
Social Value Opportunities
While social value is not explicitly required, a bidder could subtly weave in commitments to local employment or sustainable logistics for delivery as part of their overall project execution narrative, if feasible without impacting cost.
Bid Focus Areas
Collaborative robot complex (Cost)100.0%

Aggressively price the entire package (robot, delivery, installation, training) to be the lowest. Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all cost drivers and optimize for the lowest possible compliant bid. Ensure all ancillary costs are clearly itemized and competitive.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price for Lowest Bid
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weight on cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible compliant bid. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, supply chain optimization, and potentially leveraging existing stock or favorable supplier agreements. Ensure all included components (delivery, installation, training) are priced competitively.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Provide Comprehensive Technical Description with Compatibility Assurance
CriticalMed effort

Submit a detailed technical description of the collaborative robot complex. Crucially, explicitly address and demonstrate how all system components and parts are compatible. This could involve detailed schematics, interface specifications, or a statement of guaranteed interoperability.

Meets a critical technical requirement and mitigates risk of rejection.
Thoroughly Complete Hankepass/ESPD and Declarations
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the Hankepass (ESPD) and any other required declarations (e.g., sanctions compliance) are completed accurately and comprehensively. As the Hankepass is a self-declaration, ensure internal processes are robust to confirm all stated qualifications and conditions are met.

Essential for eligibility and avoiding exclusion.
Develop a Clear 4-Month Project Execution Plan
HighMed effort

Outline a realistic and efficient project plan demonstrating the ability to deliver the entire complex, including installation and training, within the 4-month timeframe. This plan should highlight key milestones and resource allocation.

Builds confidence in delivery capability and addresses the short duration.
Seek Clarification on Ambiguities
HighLow effort

Review all tender documents, especially 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' and 'Vastavustingimused', for any potential ambiguities regarding eligibility, technical requirements, or submission formats. Proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority to avoid misinterpretation.

Reduces risk of non-compliance and bid rejection.
Highlight Proven Integration Expertise
MediumLow effort

If possible, subtly highlight past experience in integrating complex robotic systems or providing end-to-end solutions. This can add value beyond just the price, demonstrating a higher level of technical competence.

Adds a layer of technical credibility beyond pure price.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider of a fully integrated and compatible collaborative robot system, emphasizing efficient delivery within the specified timeframe. Highlight the simplicity of dealing with a single supplier for all aspects of the contract.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The tender is not divided into lots because the lots form a complete system, and dividing it into lots is not practical to ensure system and part compatibility.
--The bidder must confirm compliance with sanctions.
--If applicable, a power of attorney for joint bidders must be submitted.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The bidder must provide a confirmation of meeting the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, which is initially evidenced by the bidder's own confirmation, but is not filled out directly.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must submit a technical description of the collaborative robot complex.
--The system and its parts must be compatible.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is for a collaborative robot complex with a value of 100,000.0 EUR.
--The cost of the collaborative robot complex will be evaluated, with the lowest bid receiving maximum points.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307784_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.3 KB

The bidder must submit a technical description, confirm compliance with sanctions, and provide a power of attorney for joint bidders if applicable, while also identifying trade secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307784_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The tender evaluates the cost of the collaborative robot complex, where the lowest bid receives the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307784_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 62.9 KB

The 'Hankepass' (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator serving as preliminary evidence of meeting the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, but it is not filled out directly.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a collaborative robot complex is generally well-structured with clear financial and timeline information. However, it lacks specific details on exclusion and eligibility grounds, and sustainability aspects are minimal.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and a reasonable submission deadline. The absence of reported disputes and the presence of EU funding contribute positively. However, the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed eligibility criteria could be improved.

Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed.
Eligibility requirements are vaguely described as a self-declaration without specific criteria.
Clarity80/100

The description of the collaborative robot complex is concise. Requirements for technical capability (technical description, compatibility) and financial aspects (cost evaluation) are present. The evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting, which is a good indicator of clarity.

Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. The contract duration is specified. However, the AI could not fully analyze all attached documents due to format, potentially missing crucial details. The 'Hankepass' is noted as not being filled out directly, which might indicate missing information for bidders.

AI could not fully analyze all attached documents (.xml, .asice formats).
The 'Hankepass' is described as not being filled out directly, suggesting potential ambiguity for bidders.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement with electronic submission, promoting accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed, and the evaluation criterion (lowest bid gets maximum points) is objective. The deadline is reasonable. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are positive aspects. The contract duration is specified. However, the contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is limited to the EU funding characteristic. The tender validity period is provided.

Contract start date is not explicitly mentioned.
Financing information is limited to 'EU Funded'.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no specific mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided text, limiting the sustainability score.

No specific green procurement criteria mentioned.
No explicit social or innovation aspects are detailed.

Strengths

Clear financial and timeline information.
Electronic submission and e-procurement.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest bid).
EU Funded characteristic.

Concerns

Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds.
Vague eligibility requirements.
Limited sustainability considerations.

Recommendations

1. Provide specific mandatory exclusion grounds.
2. Clarify eligibility requirements with concrete criteria.
3. Incorporate specific green or social procurement objectives.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline