Trenger du hjelp fra en anbudsekspert? Se vår anbudsforberedelsestjeneste
Anbud

Design of Käopesa Family Home

Lukket

Fristen for innlevering er utløpt

Fristen for innlevering av dette anbudet er utløpt og aksepterer ikke lenger søknader. Informasjonen nedenfor beholdes for referanseformål.

Se aktive anbud
Frist
Utløpt
5. februar 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Tjenester
Referanse
304874
Verdi
€40,000
Sted
Estonia, Estland
Publisert
22. januar 2026
Organisasjon
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

22. januar 2026

Frist for spørsmål

29. januar 2026

Frist for innlevering

5. februar 2026

Anbudsåpning

5. februar 2026

VinnersjansePRO
🔒
Oppgrader til Professional
Se din estimerte vinnersjanse basert på historiske data.
Oppgrader til Professional →
KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
SektorinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp sektorinnsikt
Se gjennomsnittlige vinnerpriser, konkurransenivåer og markedstrender.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
€40,000
Varighet
6 måneder
Sted
Estonia
Type
Tjenester
84
Kvalitetsscore/100
Utmerket
Markedsbenchmark
Gj.snittlig vinnerpris
€71,415
Gj.snittlig antall tilbud
4.8
Konkurranse
Medium
SMB-vinnere
99%
2,006 analyserte anbud

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Hankelepingu esemeks on peatöövõtu korras Tartus, Jaama tn 72 Käopesa peremaja projekteerimine. Peremaja rajatakse senise majandusmaja asemele, lammutades senise hoone.
Grønn anskaffelseEU-finansiertElektronisk innlevering

Kjør risikoanalyse

Identifiser potensielle risikoer, inkonsekvenser og varsellamper i alle anbudsunderlag. Få en detaljert risikorapport med alvorlighetsgrader og anbefalinger for risikoreduserende tiltak.

Logg inn

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

12 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (4)
Obligatorisk (2)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (2)
Finansiell (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit the bid electronically.
--Submit all required qualification and exclusion criteria information (e.g., via the ESPD form).
--Adhere to instructions for declaring business secrets.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Meet the mandatory exclusion grounds specified in the tender documents.
--Ensure that subcontractors are not subject to EU sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Meet the qualification criteria specified in the tender documents.
--For joint bids, submit a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Provide design services for the Käopesa family house as per the terms of reference.
--Fulfill all technical specifications and requirements outlined in the "lähteülesanne lisadega.zip" document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit a financial proposal (price).
--Bids will be evaluated solely on price, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

6 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

VastavustingimusedPDF
304874_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines bidder compliance conditions, including restrictions on subcontractors related to EU sanctions, requirements for joint bidders' power of attorney, and guidelines for declaring business secrets, all of which must be addressed in the tender submission.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304874_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

Bids for the Käopesa family house design services tender will be evaluated solely based on cost, with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum score.

Vis
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304874_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 36.2 KB

This ESPD document explains the qualification and exclusion criteria set by Tartu City Government for the Käopesa family house design tender, which companies must complete electronically.

Vis
HankelepingDOC
Hankeleping.docx -- 31.0 KB

This document is a draft design service contract, outlining the client (Tartu City Government) and containing blank spaces for the contractor's details.

Vis
Lähteülesanne lisadegaZIP
lähteülesanne lisadega.zip -- 4.3 MB

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
LisateaveDOC
Lisateave.doc -- 30.0 KB

```json
{
"summary_ee": "See dokument pakub täiendavat teavet Tartu Linnavalitsuse Käopesa peremaja projekteerimise hanke kohta, aidates pakkujatel paremini mõista projekti konteksti ja nõudeid.",
"summary_en": "This document provides additional information regarding the Tartu City Government's tender for the design of the Käopesa family house, helping bidders better understand the project context and requirements.",
"summary_lv": "Šis dokuments sniedz papildu informāciju par Tartu pilsētas pašvaldības iepirkumu "Käopesa" ģimenes mājas projektēšanai, palīdzot pretendentiem labāk izprast projekta kontekstu un prasības.",
"is_required": false,
"document_type": "Üldine Info"
}
```

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

84
Utmerket

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender demonstrates good overall quality with high clarity, fairness, and data consistency, supported by electronic submission and EU funding. However, it has notable gaps in social and innovation aspects of sustainability.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar85/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, with reasonable deadlines, a clearly defined procedure (negotiated), appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD aligns with EU procurement standards, and mandatory disclosure requirements are met.

Klarhet90/100

The tender description is clear and unambiguous, and requirements are well-documented and understandable, with explicit references to supporting documents. Evaluation criteria are unambiguously stated as solely price-based, and performance conditions are clearly referenced.

Fullstendighet80/100

Most essential information, including basic details, financial data, timeline, and location, is provided. However, the content of two key documents ('Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' (XML) and 'Lähteülesanne lisadega' (ZIP)) could not be analyzed by AI, which limits a full verification of their completeness.

•Content of 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' (XML) and 'Lähteülesanne lisadega' (ZIP) could not be analyzed by AI, limiting full content verification.
Rettferdighet90/100

The tender appears fair and transparent, with the estimated value disclosed, reasonable deadlines for preparation, and objective, clearly stated evaluation criteria (lowest price). E-procurement is enabled for equal access, and requirements seem generic, not tailored to a specific company.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet80/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration and financing conditions are specified or referenced to a document. While the exact contract start date is not explicitly provided, this is common in procurement processes.

•Exact contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Datakonsistens95/100

All key fields are populated, and the data is logical and consistent across the various sections, with no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and coherent.

Bærekraft50/100

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' and is 'EU Funded,' which are positive aspects. However, it lacks specific social criteria and an innovation focus, as highlighted by automated checks, indicating room for improvement in broader sustainability integration.

•No explicit social criteria included.
•No explicit innovation focus included.

Styrker

High clarity with unambiguous description and evaluation criteria.
Strong legal compliance, including ESPD use and reasonable deadlines.
Full transparency with disclosed value and objective evaluation criteria.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled for equal access.
Good data consistency with all key fields populated and no disputes.

Bekymringer

Lack of explicit social criteria in sustainability aspects.
Absence of an innovation focus within the tender requirements.
Inability to AI-analyze content of two key documents (XML, ZIP), limiting full content verification.
Solely price-based evaluation for design services might not ensure optimal quality outcomes.

Anbefalinger

1. Incorporate specific social criteria and encourage innovative solutions in future tenders to enhance broader sustainability.
2. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in AI-readable formats (e.g., PDF for specifications) to improve transparency and accessibility for automated analysis.
3. Consider adopting a Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) approach for design services to balance price with quality and innovation.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter