Hulp van een aanbestedingsexpert nodig? Bekijk onze dienst voor aanbestedingsvoorbereiding
Aanbestedingen

Design of Käopesa Family Home

Gesloten

Deadline voor indiening verstreken

De deadline voor het indienen van deze aanbesteding is verstreken en er worden geen aanvragen meer geaccepteerd. De onderstaande informatie wordt ter referentie bewaard.

Bekijk actieve aanbestedingen
Deadline
Verlopen
5 februari 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Diensten
Referentie
304874
Waarde
€40,000
Locatie
Estonia, Estland
Gepubliceerd
22 januari 2026
Organisatie
CPV-code
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

22 januari 2026

Deadline voor vragen

29 januari 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

5 februari 2026

Opening van de aanbesteding

5 februari 2026

WinstkansPRO
🔒
Upgrade naar Professional
Bekijk je geschatte winstkans op basis van historische gegevens.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Buyer Intelligence
Bekijk uitgavenpatronen, voorkeursprocedures en meer.
Upgrade naar Professional →
SectorinzichtenPRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Sectorinzichten
Bekijk gemiddelde winnende prijzen, concurrentieniveaus en markttrends.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
€40,000
Looptijd
6 maanden
Locatie
Estonia
Type
Diensten
84
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Uitstekend
Marktbenchmark
Gem. Winnende Prijs
€71,415
Gem. Inschrijvingen
4.8
Concurrentie
Gemiddeld
MKB-winnaars
99%
2,006 geanalyseerde aanbestedingen

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

Hankelepingu esemeks on peatöövõtu korras Tartus, Jaama tn 72 Käopesa peremaja projekteerimine. Peremaja rajatakse senise majandusmaja asemele, lammutades senise hoone.
Groene InkoopEU-gefinancierdElektronische indiening

Risicoanalyse uitvoeren

Identificeer potentiële risico's, inconsistenties en rode vlaggen in alle aanbestedingsdocumenten. Ontvang een gedetailleerd risicorapport met ernstniveaus en aanbevelingen voor mitigatie.

Inloggen

Winststrategie

Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.

Inloggen

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

12 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (4)
Verplicht (2)
Naleving (2)
Technisch (2)
Financieel (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit the bid electronically.
--Submit all required qualification and exclusion criteria information (e.g., via the ESPD form).
--Adhere to instructions for declaring business secrets.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Meet the mandatory exclusion grounds specified in the tender documents.
--Ensure that subcontractors are not subject to EU sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Meet the qualification criteria specified in the tender documents.
--For joint bids, submit a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Provide design services for the Käopesa family house as per the terms of reference.
--Fulfill all technical specifications and requirements outlined in the "lähteülesanne lisadega.zip" document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit a financial proposal (price).
--Bids will be evaluated solely on price, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

6 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

VastavustingimusedPDF
304874_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines bidder compliance conditions, including restrictions on subcontractors related to EU sanctions, requirements for joint bidders' power of attorney, and guidelines for declaring business secrets, all of which must be addressed in the tender submission.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304874_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

Bids for the Käopesa family house design services tender will be evaluated solely based on cost, with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304874_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 36.2 KB

This ESPD document explains the qualification and exclusion criteria set by Tartu City Government for the Käopesa family house design tender, which companies must complete electronically.

HankelepingDOC
Hankeleping.docx -- 31.0 KB

This document is a draft design service contract, outlining the client (Tartu City Government) and containing blank spaces for the contractor's details.

Lähteülesanne lisadegaZIP
lähteülesanne lisadega.zip -- 4.3 MB

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

LisateaveDOC
Lisateave.doc -- 30.0 KB

```json
{
"summary_ee": "See dokument pakub täiendavat teavet Tartu Linnavalitsuse Käopesa peremaja projekteerimise hanke kohta, aidates pakkujatel paremini mõista projekti konteksti ja nõudeid.",
"summary_en": "This document provides additional information regarding the Tartu City Government's tender for the design of the Käopesa family house, helping bidders better understand the project context and requirements.",
"summary_lv": "Šis dokuments sniedz papildu informāciju par Tartu pilsētas pašvaldības iepirkumu "Käopesa" ģimenes mājas projektēšanai, palīdzot pretendentiem labāk izprast projekta kontekstu un prasības.",
"is_required": false,
"document_type": "Üldine Info"
}
```

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

84
Uitstekend

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender demonstrates good overall quality with high clarity, fairness, and data consistency, supported by electronic submission and EU funding. However, it has notable gaps in social and innovation aspects of sustainability.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving85/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, with reasonable deadlines, a clearly defined procedure (negotiated), appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD aligns with EU procurement standards, and mandatory disclosure requirements are met.

Duidelijkheid90/100

The tender description is clear and unambiguous, and requirements are well-documented and understandable, with explicit references to supporting documents. Evaluation criteria are unambiguously stated as solely price-based, and performance conditions are clearly referenced.

Volledigheid80/100

Most essential information, including basic details, financial data, timeline, and location, is provided. However, the content of two key documents ('Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' (XML) and 'Lähteülesanne lisadega' (ZIP)) could not be analyzed by AI, which limits a full verification of their completeness.

•Content of 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' (XML) and 'Lähteülesanne lisadega' (ZIP) could not be analyzed by AI, limiting full content verification.
Eerlijkheid90/100

The tender appears fair and transparent, with the estimated value disclosed, reasonable deadlines for preparation, and objective, clearly stated evaluation criteria (lowest price). E-procurement is enabled for equal access, and requirements seem generic, not tailored to a specific company.

Praktische uitvoerbaarheid80/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration and financing conditions are specified or referenced to a document. While the exact contract start date is not explicitly provided, this is common in procurement processes.

•Exact contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Gegevensconsistentie95/100

All key fields are populated, and the data is logical and consistent across the various sections, with no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and coherent.

Duurzaamheid50/100

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' and is 'EU Funded,' which are positive aspects. However, it lacks specific social criteria and an innovation focus, as highlighted by automated checks, indicating room for improvement in broader sustainability integration.

•No explicit social criteria included.
•No explicit innovation focus included.

Sterke punten

High clarity with unambiguous description and evaluation criteria.
Strong legal compliance, including ESPD use and reasonable deadlines.
Full transparency with disclosed value and objective evaluation criteria.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled for equal access.
Good data consistency with all key fields populated and no disputes.

Aandachtspunten

Lack of explicit social criteria in sustainability aspects.
Absence of an innovation focus within the tender requirements.
Inability to AI-analyze content of two key documents (XML, ZIP), limiting full content verification.
Solely price-based evaluation for design services might not ensure optimal quality outcomes.

Aanbevelingen

1. Incorporate specific social criteria and encourage innovative solutions in future tenders to enhance broader sustainability.
2. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in AI-readable formats (e.g., PDF for specifications) to improve transparency and accessibility for automated analysis.
3. Consider adopting a Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) approach for design services to balance price with quality and innovation.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten