Brug for hjælp fra en udbudsekspert? Se vores udbudsforberedelsestjeneste
Udbud

Design of Käopesa Family Home

Lukket

Fristen for indsendelse er overskredet

Fristen for indsendelse af dette udbud er overskredet, og der modtages ikke længere ansøgninger. Oplysningerne nedenfor er gemt til referenceformål.

Gennemse aktive udbud
Frist
Udløbet
5. februar 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Serviceydelser
Reference
304874
Værdi
€40,000
Lokation
Estonia, Estland
Udgivet
22. januar 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

22. januar 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

29. januar 2026

Frist for tilbud

5. februar 2026

Åbning af udbud

5. februar 2026

VinderchancePRO
🔒
Opgrader til Professional
Se din estimerede vinderchance baseret på historiske data.
Opgrader til Professionel →
OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
SektorsindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for sektorsindsigt
Se gennemsnitlige vinderpriser, konkurrenceniveauer og markedstrends.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
€40,000
Varighed
6 måneder
Lokation
Estonia
Type
Serviceydelser
84
Kvalitetsscore/100
Fremragende
Markedsbenchmark
Gns. Vindende Pris
€71,415
Gns. Tilbud
4.8
Konkurrence
Medium
SMV Vindere
99%
2,006 udbud analyseret

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Hankelepingu esemeks on peatöövõtu korras Tartus, Jaama tn 72 Käopesa peremaja projekteerimine. Peremaja rajatakse senise majandusmaja asemele, lammutades senise hoone.
Grønt IndkøbEU-finansieretElektronisk Afsendelse

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

12 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (4)
Obligatorisk (2)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (2)
Finansiel (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit the bid electronically.
--Submit all required qualification and exclusion criteria information (e.g., via the ESPD form).
--Adhere to instructions for declaring business secrets.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Meet the mandatory exclusion grounds specified in the tender documents.
--Ensure that subcontractors are not subject to EU sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Meet the qualification criteria specified in the tender documents.
--For joint bids, submit a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Provide design services for the Käopesa family house as per the terms of reference.
--Fulfill all technical specifications and requirements outlined in the "lähteülesanne lisadega.zip" document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit a financial proposal (price).
--Bids will be evaluated solely on price, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

6 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

VastavustingimusedPDF
304874_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines bidder compliance conditions, including restrictions on subcontractors related to EU sanctions, requirements for joint bidders' power of attorney, and guidelines for declaring business secrets, all of which must be addressed in the tender submission.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304874_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

Bids for the Käopesa family house design services tender will be evaluated solely based on cost, with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum score.

Vis
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304874_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 36.2 KB

This ESPD document explains the qualification and exclusion criteria set by Tartu City Government for the Käopesa family house design tender, which companies must complete electronically.

Vis
HankelepingDOC
Hankeleping.docx -- 31.0 KB

This document is a draft design service contract, outlining the client (Tartu City Government) and containing blank spaces for the contractor's details.

Vis
Lähteülesanne lisadegaZIP
lähteülesanne lisadega.zip -- 4.3 MB

Intet resumé tilgængeligt for dette dokument.

Vis
LisateaveDOC
Lisateave.doc -- 30.0 KB

```json
{
"summary_ee": "See dokument pakub täiendavat teavet Tartu Linnavalitsuse Käopesa peremaja projekteerimise hanke kohta, aidates pakkujatel paremini mõista projekti konteksti ja nõudeid.",
"summary_en": "This document provides additional information regarding the Tartu City Government's tender for the design of the Käopesa family house, helping bidders better understand the project context and requirements.",
"summary_lv": "Šis dokuments sniedz papildu informāciju par Tartu pilsētas pašvaldības iepirkumu "Käopesa" ģimenes mājas projektēšanai, palīdzot pretendentiem labāk izprast projekta kontekstu un prasības.",
"is_required": false,
"document_type": "Üldine Info"
}
```

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

84
Fremragende

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender demonstrates good overall quality with high clarity, fairness, and data consistency, supported by electronic submission and EU funding. However, it has notable gaps in social and innovation aspects of sustainability.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning85/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, with reasonable deadlines, a clearly defined procedure (negotiated), appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD aligns with EU procurement standards, and mandatory disclosure requirements are met.

Klarhed90/100

The tender description is clear and unambiguous, and requirements are well-documented and understandable, with explicit references to supporting documents. Evaluation criteria are unambiguously stated as solely price-based, and performance conditions are clearly referenced.

Fuldstændighed80/100

Most essential information, including basic details, financial data, timeline, and location, is provided. However, the content of two key documents ('Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' (XML) and 'Lähteülesanne lisadega' (ZIP)) could not be analyzed by AI, which limits a full verification of their completeness.

•Content of 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' (XML) and 'Lähteülesanne lisadega' (ZIP) could not be analyzed by AI, limiting full content verification.
Retfærdighed90/100

The tender appears fair and transparent, with the estimated value disclosed, reasonable deadlines for preparation, and objective, clearly stated evaluation criteria (lowest price). E-procurement is enabled for equal access, and requirements seem generic, not tailored to a specific company.

Praktisk anvendelighed80/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration and financing conditions are specified or referenced to a document. While the exact contract start date is not explicitly provided, this is common in procurement processes.

•Exact contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Datakonsistens95/100

All key fields are populated, and the data is logical and consistent across the various sections, with no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and coherent.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' and is 'EU Funded,' which are positive aspects. However, it lacks specific social criteria and an innovation focus, as highlighted by automated checks, indicating room for improvement in broader sustainability integration.

•No explicit social criteria included.
•No explicit innovation focus included.

Styrker

High clarity with unambiguous description and evaluation criteria.
Strong legal compliance, including ESPD use and reasonable deadlines.
Full transparency with disclosed value and objective evaluation criteria.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled for equal access.
Good data consistency with all key fields populated and no disputes.

Bekymringer

Lack of explicit social criteria in sustainability aspects.
Absence of an innovation focus within the tender requirements.
Inability to AI-analyze content of two key documents (XML, ZIP), limiting full content verification.
Solely price-based evaluation for design services might not ensure optimal quality outcomes.

Anbefalinger

1. Incorporate specific social criteria and encourage innovative solutions in future tenders to enhance broader sustainability.
2. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in AI-readable formats (e.g., PDF for specifications) to improve transparency and accessibility for automated analysis.
3. Consider adopting a Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) approach for design services to balance price with quality and innovation.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter