Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction of F.R. Kreutzwald and E. Tuglas intersection

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306906
Value
€1,612,903
Location
Estonia
Published
March 12, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of reconstruction of F. R. Kreutzwaldi and F. Tuglas street intersection and its vicinity100%
Technical and quality indicators for traffic management devicesTechnical
Special requirements for carrying out works in a heritage protection areaTechnical
Control and acceptance operations and laboratory testsTechnical
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,612,903
Duration
5 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The technical specification of the public procurement is provided in the annex to the base documents. https://tartulv-my.sharepoint.com/:f:/g/personal/siim_mitt_tartu_ee/IgAywZG9QVWoRLWRK307CzDeAQxBUP0oanGPe1sePR4AjWY?e=1hpVsO
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender is heavily weighted towards cost, making a highly competitive price the primary driver of success. Bidders must meticulously detail their cost breakdown and ensure compliance with all mandatory exclusion and eligibility criteria, particularly regarding associations with the Russian Federation. While technical aspects are mandatory, they are not evaluative, so meeting them efficiently is key.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and compliant solution for the F.R. Kreutzwaldi and E. Tuglas intersection reconstruction.

Guaranteed adherence to all technical specifications and heritage protection requirements with efficient execution.

Key Opportunities
Leverage efficient construction methodologies to drive down costs.
Demonstrate robust compliance with exclusion grounds to build trust and avoid disqualification.
Streamline the Hankepass submission process for prompt and accurate completion.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize resource allocation, and explore economies of scale. Consider lean construction principles and efficient supply chain management.

Ensuring absolute compliance with all mandatory exclusion and eligibility criteria, especially regarding Russian Federation associations.

Implement rigorous due diligence on all subcontractors and suppliers. Maintain clear documentation and provide comprehensive evidence for any required explanations.

Accurate and detailed cost breakdown that meets the contracting authority's expectations.

Carefully review the 'Pakkumustabel_Kreutzwaldi_Tuglase.xlsx' template and ensure all required cost components (sampling, insurance, site maintenance, temporary works, etc.) are accurately estimated and justified.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A financially stable construction company with a proven track record in road reconstruction projects in Estonia, possessing strong cost management capabilities and efficient operational processes. They must have robust compliance procedures to address exclusion grounds and a clear understanding of local heritage protection requirements.
Key Requirements
Detailed cost breakdown (Pakkumustabel_Kreutzwaldi_Tuglase.xlsx)
Declaration (Hankepass) as initial evidence
No association with the Russian Federation (subcontractors or suppliers)
Explanations and evidence regarding criminal convictions
Adherence to technical and quality indicators for traffic management devices (Lisa 10)
Use of vibration-minimizing technologies in heritage areas (Lisa 11)
Adherence to control and acceptance operations and laboratory tests (Lisa 9)
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably lower total cost of ownership through efficient project management and material sourcing.
A proactive and transparent approach to compliance, particularly concerning geopolitical exclusion grounds.
A highly detailed and well-justified cost breakdown that reflects a deep understanding of the project's complexities.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to local employment or training opportunities during the project execution phase. This can be a subtle differentiator if competitors do not offer similar initiatives.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of reconstruction100.0%

Achieve the lowest possible bid price by optimizing all cost components. Conduct detailed cost engineering and value analysis. Ensure the cost breakdown is comprehensive and transparent, aligning with the required format.

Technical and quality indicators for traffic management devicesNone%

Ensure full compliance with Lisa 10. Document adherence to standards and legislation. Focus on efficient implementation rather than innovation, as this is not an evaluative criterion.

Special requirements for carrying out works in a heritage protection areaNone%

Demonstrate a clear understanding of Lisa 11 requirements. Detail the specific vibration-minimizing technologies and machinery to be used. Ensure qualified personnel are assigned to heritage supervision.

Control and acceptance operations and laboratory testsNone%

Confirm adherence to procedures outlined in Lisa 9. Outline the quality control processes and laboratory testing protocols that will be followed.

Recommendations6
Master the Cost Breakdown
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant resources to accurately populate the 'Pakkumustabel_Kreutzwaldi_Tuglase.xlsx'. Ensure all line items are accounted for, including sampling, insurance, site maintenance, temporary works, surveying, and consultations. Benchmark against similar projects to ensure competitiveness.

Directly impacts the bid's score and competitiveness.
Fortify Exclusion Ground Compliance
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct thorough due diligence on all proposed subcontractors and suppliers to confirm no association with the Russian Federation. Prepare clear and concise explanations and supporting evidence for any criminal convictions, as required.

Prevents disqualification.
Price Aggressively but Realistically
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% cost evaluation, aim for the lowest possible bid. However, ensure the price is sustainable and covers all project costs and a reasonable profit margin. Avoid underbidding to the point of financial risk.

Maximizes score for the primary evaluation criterion.
Flawless Hankepass Submission
HighMed effort

Carefully complete the Hankepass (ESPD) according to the contracting authority's specified format and conditions. Ensure all declarations are accurate and consistent with other submitted documentation.

Ensures eligibility and avoids administrative issues.
Document Heritage Protection Measures
HighMed effort

Clearly outline the specific vibration-minimizing technologies and machinery that will be employed in heritage protection areas, referencing Lisa 11. This demonstrates preparedness and understanding.

Confirms compliance with a key technical requirement.
Contingency Planning for Price Volatility
MediumMed effort

While not explicitly requested, consider building in minor contingencies for material or labor cost fluctuations within the detailed cost breakdown, if feasible without significantly impacting competitiveness.

Reduces financial risk during project execution.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-efficient bidder that demonstrably meets all mandatory requirements. Emphasize operational efficiency and a lean approach to project execution. Highlight a clean compliance record, particularly concerning geopolitical risks.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit a detailed cost breakdown (Pakkumustabel_Kreutzwaldi_Tuglase.xlsx).
--Bidders must provide a declaration (Hankepass) as initial evidence.
--Bidders must provide explanations and evidence regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must not be associated with the Russian Federation (as subcontractors or suppliers).
--Bidders must provide explanations and evidence regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation.
--In case of joint bids, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--Bidders must provide a declaration (Hankepass) as initial evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, adhering to the contracting authority's conditions and expected response format.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The contractor must follow technical and quality indicators for traffic management devices, including requirements for materials, manufacturing, and installation according to current standards and legislation.
--In areas of cultural heritage, the contractor must use vibration-minimizing technologies and specific machinery, ensuring quality and cultural heritage supervision.
--The contractor must adhere to the procedures for control and acceptance operations and laboratory tests for road construction as described in Lisa 9.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender will be evaluated based on cost, with the lowest bidder receiving the maximum points.
--Bidders must submit a detailed cost breakdown including various work and service costs, such as sampling, insurance, site maintenance, temporary works, other works, surveying, consultations, and preparation of work projects.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306906_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306906_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.7 KB

The bidder must confirm that no subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation will be involved, and for joint bids, a power of attorney must be submitted.

KululoendXLS
Lisa_Pakkumustabel_Kreutzwaldi_Tuglase.xlsx -- 44.3 KB

Bidders must submit a detailed cost breakdown covering various work and service expenses, including sampling, insurances, site maintenance, temporary works, miscellaneous works, surveying, consultations, and the preparation of work projects.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306906_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, where the lowest bidder receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306906_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.0 KB

The tender pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and the format of expected responses.

AlusdokumentDOC
Alusdokument.docx -- 33.2 KB

The base document for the tender clarifies the terms, procedures, and requirements for the reconstruction of the F.R. Kreutzwaldi and E. Tuglas intersection tender, including bidder qualifications and exclusion grounds.

Lisa 10 - Liikluskorraldusvahenditele kehtivad üldised tehnilised ja kvaliteetnä...PDF
LISA 10_Liikluskorraldusvahenditele kehtivad ... -- 1.5 MB

The contractor must adhere to technical and quality indicators for traffic management devices, including requirements for materials, manufacturing, and installation according to applicable standards and legislation.

Lisa 11 - Tööde teostamise erinõuded muinsuskaitsealasDOC
Lisa_11_Tööde_teostamise _erinõuded_muinsuska... -- 619.0 KB

The contractor must use vibration-minimizing technologies and specific machinery when performing works in a heritage protection area, ensuring quality and heritage supervision.

Lisa 9 - Enamlevinud kontroll ja vastuvõtutoimingute loeteluXLS
Lisa 9_Enimlevinud kontroll_ja_vastuvotu_.xls... -- 68.5 KB

This document outlines the client's and contractor's control and acceptance procedures, as well as the process for conducting laboratory tests during road reconstruction.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications and evaluation criteria. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on external document links for crucial details.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement regulations, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are indicated. The exclusion grounds related to the Russian Federation are a specific, but potentially justifiable, geopolitical requirement.

Clarity80/100

Technical specifications are provided in attached documents, which are clearly referenced. The evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting, with cost being the primary factor. The description of the project's indivisibility is detailed.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the full technical description and detailed requirements are solely accessible via external links, which slightly reduces completeness within the immediate tender notice.

Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the evaluation is based on objective criteria (lowest cost). Full document access is provided through links. The exclusion of bidders associated with the Russian Federation, while potentially a geopolitical necessity, could be seen as a specific tailoring, though not necessarily unfair if justified by regulation.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. However, the reliance on external links for key documents (technical specifications, cost breakdown template) can be less practical than having them directly attached. The contract start date is not specified.

Reliance on external links for critical documents
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender validity period is clearly stated.

Sustainability50/100

There are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded, which might explain the lack of specific sustainability mandates.

Lack of green procurement criteria
Absence of social or innovation focus

Strengths

Clear technical specifications provided via links
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest cost)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Detailed description of project indivisibility

Concerns

Reliance on external links for essential documents
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Contract start date not specified

Recommendations

1. Embed all essential tender documents directly within the platform for easier access.
2. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, use of recycled materials) into the evaluation.
3. Specify the intended contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline