Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Preventive maintenance and repair of dental equipment

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306754
Value
€375,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 27, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of the bid100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€375,000
Duration
84 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€265,238
Avg. Bids
2.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
90%
843 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to conclude a framework agreement for carrying out preventive maintenance and repair work on dental equipment.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for dental equipment maintenance and repair is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating exceptional cost-effectiveness while ensuring robust technical capability and compliance. Leveraging experience with similar framework agreements and highlighting efficient operational models will be crucial for differentiation.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: Delivering cost-effective, high-quality maintenance and repair services for dental equipment through optimized operations and competitive pricing.

Reliable Partnership: Ensuring seamless, uninterrupted operation of critical dental equipment through proactive, expert maintenance and swift, efficient repairs over an extended contract period.

Key Opportunities
Dominant focus on price in evaluation.
Long-term framework agreement (84 months) allows for long-term planning and economies of scale.
No specific technical capability requirements detailed, allowing for flexibility in demonstrating expertise.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the primary evaluation criterion.

Develop a highly optimized cost structure, explore economies of scale, and present a clear value proposition that justifies the lowest price without compromising service quality. Consider lean operational models and efficient logistics.

Lack of detailed technical requirements may lead to subjective interpretation of service quality.

Proactively detail the technical expertise, methodologies, and quality assurance processes that will be employed. Provide case studies or testimonials demonstrating successful maintenance of similar equipment. Clearly define service level agreements (SLAs) in the bid.

Potential for new entrants or established players to offer aggressive pricing.

Thorough market research to understand competitor pricing strategies. Focus on demonstrating long-term cost savings and reliability beyond the initial price point. Highlight the total cost of ownership.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A specialized service provider with a proven track record in medical equipment maintenance, particularly dental equipment. They should possess a strong understanding of framework agreements, a highly efficient operational structure enabling competitive pricing, and a commitment to service reliability and rapid response times. Experience working with public sector entities, specifically healthcare institutions, is advantageous.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of no subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation
Submission of a bidder's pass (self-declaration)
Acceptance of tender conditions and bid compliance confirmation
Use of the provided application form
Primary evaluation based on cost of preventive maintenance and repair (lowest price maximum score)
Framework agreement for 84 months
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated efficiency in operational processes leading to superior cost-effectiveness.
Proven experience in managing long-term framework agreements for medical equipment maintenance.
A highly responsive and skilled technical team with specialized knowledge of dental equipment.
A clear and transparent pricing structure that highlights value for money.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider including a commitment to local employment or training opportunities within the Tartu region, demonstrating a commitment to the community and potentially enhancing the bidder's overall profile, even if not directly evaluated.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of preventive maintenance and repairMaximum score for lowest price

Conduct a thorough cost analysis to establish the lowest possible competitive price. Ensure all direct and indirect costs are accounted for, and identify areas for operational efficiency to drive down costs. Present pricing clearly and transparently, potentially offering tiered service levels if permissible within the application form.

Recommendations6
Meticulously complete the Bidder's Pass (ESPD)
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the Bidder's Pass (Hankepass) is completed accurately and comprehensively, serving as the primary self-declaration of compliance. Pay close attention to all sections, especially the confirmation regarding subcontractors and suppliers connected to the Russian Federation. Any omissions or inaccuracies could lead to disqualification.

Ensures eligibility and avoids immediate disqualification.
Optimize Pricing for Maximum Score
CriticalHigh effort

Given that price is the primary evaluation criterion, dedicate significant effort to developing the most competitive pricing strategy. Analyze cost drivers thoroughly and identify opportunities for efficiency gains. Benchmark against known market rates for similar services to ensure competitiveness while maintaining profitability.

Directly impacts the score and likelihood of winning.
Highlight Operational Efficiency and Expertise
HighMed effort

Since technical requirements are not detailed, proactively demonstrate technical capability and operational efficiency. Detail your maintenance methodologies, technician qualifications, response times, and quality assurance processes. Showcase experience with similar long-term framework agreements and highlight how your efficient operations translate into cost savings for the client.

Builds confidence in service quality and value beyond price.
Thoroughly Review Framework Agreement Template
HighMed effort

Carefully examine 'Lisa 1 - Raamleping' to understand the contractual obligations, service level expectations, and any specific clauses related to maintenance, repair, and reporting. Identify any potential risks or areas where your standard operating procedures may need adjustment.

Ensures full understanding of contractual terms and potential risks.
Proactively Address Russian Federation Sanctions Compliance
MediumMed effort

Ensure robust internal processes are in place to verify that no subcontractors or suppliers involved in your bid have connections to the Russian Federation. Document these verification processes as part of your bid submission if possible, or be prepared to provide evidence if requested.

Avoids disqualification due to non-compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds.
Consider Local Impact Commitment
LowLow effort

Although social aspects are not a requirement, consider a brief statement or commitment regarding local employment or support for the Tartu region. This can subtly enhance your bid's appeal without significant effort or cost.

Potentially enhances bidder perception, though not directly evaluated.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as offering the best long-term value by combining the lowest initial price with superior operational efficiency and reliability, ensuring minimal downtime and total cost of ownership for the contracting authority.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on the cost of preventive maintenance and repair of dental equipment, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The tender is not divided into lots as this would lead to additional costs and inefficient use of funds.
--The contract is a framework agreement.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit a bidder's pass, which is a self-declaration confirming compliance with the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
--Bidders must confirm their acceptance of the tender conditions and that their bid complies with them.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--N/A (No specific technical capability requirements are detailed in the provided summaries).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--N/A (No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided summaries).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306754_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.9 KB

Bidders must confirm that they will not involve subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation in contract performance, and joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.

Vorm II - AvaldusDOC
Vorm II_Avaldus.docx -- 17.6 KB

This form is an application to participate in the tender procedure, confirming agreement with the tender conditions and compliance of the bid.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306754_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the cost of preventive maintenance and repair of dental equipment, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306754_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.4 KB

The tender pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary proof of meeting the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, to be filled out electronically.

Juhised pakkujalePDF
Juhised pakkujale.pdf -- 232.4 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the public procurement for preventive maintenance and repair of dental equipment, clarifying the procurement procedure, participation restrictions, and submission requirements.

Lisa 1 - RaamlepingPDF
Lisa 1_Raamleping.pdf -- 211.4 KB

This document is a framework agreement template outlining the terms for preventive maintenance and repair of dental equipment and its integral parts.

Vorm I - Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm I_Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 18.6 KB

This document is a joint bidder authorization, designating one joint bidder to represent others in submitting the bid and concluding the contract.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for preventive maintenance and repair of dental equipment is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor documentation completeness gaps.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. Deadlines are specified, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is provided. No disputes are noted. The exclusion ground related to Russian Federation connections is a specific regulatory requirement that is addressed.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender's objective is clear. Requirements are documented, and the primary evaluation criterion (cost) is specified. The conditions for participation, including exclusion grounds and eligibility, are outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, specific technical and financial capability requirements are not detailed in the provided summaries, which could be a point of concern for potential bidders needing to assess their suitability.

Missing detailed technical capability requirements
Missing detailed financial requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines appear reasonable. The primary evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price). E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The restriction of 'Max Participants: 1' is unusual and could be perceived as limiting competition, though it might be justified by the nature of a framework agreement. The exclusion of subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation is a specific geopolitical requirement, not necessarily unfair if applied universally.

Max Participants: 1 could limit competition
Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. A document URL for the opening place is provided. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is not detailed. The contract duration is long (84 months), which is a significant commitment.

Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear tender objective and scope
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Clear exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements

Concerns

Lack of detailed technical and financial capability requirements
Absence of sustainability considerations
Potential limitation on competition with 'Max Participants: 1'

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed technical and financial capability requirements for bidders.
2. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the evaluation.
3. Clarify the rationale for 'Max Participants: 1' or consider increasing this limit if feasible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline