Skip to main content
Tenders

Design and construction works for the maintenance building

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306419
Value
€300,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 13, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Tender Opening

March 30, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€300,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement is the construction of an auxiliary building for AS Saku Maja at Tehnika 10, Saku alevik, Saku vald.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids will be evaluated solely on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--Bidders must submit the bid in compliance with all requirements and have reviewed all relevant additional documents.
--The tender procedure is a simplified procurement procedure.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm understanding and compliance with all tender document conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidder must confirm they meet the qualifications and exclusion grounds as required by the contracting authority.
--Bidder must submit a Hankepass (tender pass) as initial proof of meeting qualifications and exclusion grounds, to be filled electronically.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The project involves the design and construction of a technical maintenance building.
--The primary goal is the timely completion and commissioning of the technical maintenance building.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 300,000.0 EUR.
--Bidders must submit a price table for design and construction works, including costs for design works and external works.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306419_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.4 KB

The bidder must confirm understanding and compliance with all tender document conditions, including submitting the bid correctly and reviewing all relevant annexes.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306419_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids solely based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306419_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 43.4 KB

The 'Hankepass' (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator serving as preliminary evidence of qualification and exclusion grounds, but it is completed electronically, not directly within this document.

LIHTHANKEMENETLUSE KORDDOC
LIHTHANKEMENETLUSE KORD.docx -- 102.5 KB

This document outlines the procedure for a simplified procurement process for the design and construction of a technical maintenance building by AS Saku Maja.

LISA 1 - LEPINGU TINGIMUSEDDOC
LISA 1 - LEPINGU TINGIMUSED.docx -- 132.9 KB

This document outlines the contract terms detailing the requirements, deadlines, and payment for the design and construction works of the technical maintenance building.

LISA 2 - TEHNILINE KIRJELDUSDOC
LISA 2 - TEHNILINE KIRJELDUS.docx -- 482.0 KB

The contracting authority seeks to design and construct a technical maintenance building in Saku municipality, with timely completion and purposeful commissioning being the primary contractual objective.

LISA 3 - MAKSUMUSTABELXLS
LISA 3 - MAKSUMUSTABEL.xlsx -- 22.3 KB

The bidder must submit a price table for the design and construction works, including costs for design and external works.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design and construction of a maintenance building is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion focused on price. However, it lacks explicit consideration for sustainability and could benefit from more detailed technical specifications.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender exhibits good legal compliance. Deadlines appear reasonable for a simplified procedure, and the use of CPV code is appropriate. There are no immediate indications of disputes or non-regulatory compliance. The mention of 'ETÜ 2013' suggests adherence to established contractual standards.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the essential requirements are documented. The evaluation criterion of 'lowest price' is explicitly stated. Conditions for contract execution, including design and construction, deadlines, and payment, are referenced in the contract terms. However, the technical description could be more detailed.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the specific details within annexes like 'ETÜ 2013' conditions and detailed technical specifications are not fully accessible for direct AI analysis, potentially impacting completeness. The reliance on external documents for key information slightly lowers the score.

Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through the use of e-submission and e-procurement, with the value disclosed. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price). The Hankepass (ESPD) is a standard procedure for eligibility. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes electronic submission and e-procurement, which enhances practicality. The contract start date is specified. However, the availability of the full document URLs or integrated access to all annexes within the main tender notice is not explicitly confirmed, which can sometimes hinder practicality. Financing information is referenced but not detailed.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated and appear consistent. There is no indication of suspension or disputes. The dates for reveal, submission, and opening are logical and sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation. While it is not stated as EU-funded, the absence of sustainability considerations is noted.

Lack of green procurement criteria
Absence of social aspects

Strengths

Clear evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Electronic submission and e-procurement
Well-defined basic tender information
Use of standard qualification (Hankepass/ESPD)

Concerns

Limited sustainability considerations
Potential for more detailed technical specifications
Reliance on external documents for key contract terms

Recommendations

1. Include specific green procurement or social responsibility clauses.
2. Provide more detailed technical specifications within the main tender documents where possible.
3. Ensure direct links or integrated access to all essential annexes for improved bidder convenience.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline