Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction of Tõdva bridge at km 12.829 of state road No. 15 Tallinn-Rapla-Türi

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306118
Value
€800,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 02, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of construction of Tõdva bridge at km 12.829 of state road No. 15 Tallinn-Rapla-Türi100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

March 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€800,000
Duration
10 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of Tõdva bridge at km 12.829 of state road No. 15 Tallinn-Rapla-Türi in accordance with the conditions set out in the public procurement documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the Tõdva bridge construction prioritizes cost-effectiveness, making a highly competitive price the primary driver for success. Bidders must demonstrate robust financial management, efficient project execution, and meticulous attention to detail in their cost breakdown to secure maximum evaluation points. While social and innovative aspects are not explicitly weighted, demonstrating a commitment to quality and reliability will be crucial for differentiation.

Key Winning Messages

Delivering the Tõdva bridge construction project on time and within budget through efficient, cost-effective execution.

Ensuring the highest standards of quality and safety in bridge construction, backed by a proven track record and robust project management.

Key Opportunities
Dominant focus on price in evaluation criteria
Opportunity to leverage existing supplier relationships for cost savings
Potential for efficiency gains through optimized construction methodology
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to cost-driven evaluation

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost-saving measures, and explore economies of scale. Benchmark against similar projects to ensure competitiveness without compromising quality.

Potential for unforeseen site conditions or material price fluctuations impacting cost

Include robust contingency planning in the cost breakdown. Conduct thorough site investigations and secure material price agreements where possible.

Ensuring full compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all submitted documentation and subcontractor information. Seek legal counsel if any doubt exists regarding exclusion grounds.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced civil engineering firm with a proven track record in bridge construction projects of similar scale and complexity. The ideal bidder will possess strong financial stability, efficient project management capabilities, a highly competitive cost structure, and a deep understanding of Estonian construction regulations and standards. They should also have a reliable network of pre-qualified subcontractors.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of agreement with tender conditions
Completion of cost breakdown in Excel
Identification and justification of business secrets
Details of any joint bid
Subcontractor background checks (fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing)
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably lower total cost of construction than competitors, achieved through efficient methodologies and optimized resource allocation.
A highly detailed and transparent cost breakdown that clearly articulates value for money.
A strong track record of successful bridge construction projects, evidenced by case studies and client testimonials (though not explicitly requested, it builds confidence).
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider including a commitment to local employment or training opportunities during the construction phase. This can be framed as a positive contribution to the local community and may subtly influence perception, even if not formally scored.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of construction100% (implied)

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price while ensuring all technical and quality requirements can be met. This requires meticulous cost engineering, efficient supply chain management, and optimized construction methods. Every line item in the cost breakdown must be scrutinized for potential savings.

Recommendations5
Master the Cost Breakdown
CriticalHigh effort

The evaluation is solely based on price. Develop an exceptionally detailed and accurate Excel cost breakdown. Scrutinize every cost element, from labor and materials to overheads and profit margins, to identify opportunities for reduction without compromising quality or compliance. Benchmark against industry standards and historical data for similar bridge projects.

Directly impacts the bid's score and competitiveness.
Ensure Zero Exclusion Grounds
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly vet all partners, including subcontractors, against mandatory exclusion grounds (fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing). Obtain necessary declarations and evidence of reliability. Any breach will lead to immediate exclusion.

Prevents disqualification.
Highlight Project Management Efficiency
HighMed effort

Although not explicitly evaluated, a clear and concise explanation of your project management approach can indirectly demonstrate how you will achieve the low cost and meet the 10-month duration. Focus on streamlined processes, risk mitigation, and efficient resource allocation.

Builds confidence in your ability to deliver.
Proactive Subcontractor Due Diligence
HighMed effort

The tender explicitly requires background checks on subcontractors. Establish a robust process for gathering and verifying information on all subcontractors regarding criminal convictions. Have clear contractual clauses in place to ensure their compliance.

Ensures compliance and avoids potential disqualification.
Review Technical Specifications Meticulously
MediumMed effort

While technical capability is implied, the 'HD III Teetööde tehnilise kirjelduse eritingimused' document (though not analyzed) will contain critical technical details. Ensure your proposed construction methodology and materials align perfectly with these specifications to avoid any ambiguity or potential for costly deviations.

Ensures technical compliance and avoids rework.
Competitive Positioning
Position your bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the quality and safety essential for bridge construction. Emphasize your ability to deliver the project within the specified 10-month timeframe due to efficient planning and execution.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bidders must confirm agreement with tender conditions.
--Bidders must complete the cost breakdown in Excel.
--Bidders must identify and justify any business secrets.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders will be excluded if they have been convicted of fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the tender conditions.
--Bidders must complete the cost breakdown in Excel.
--Bidders must identify and justify any business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in the provided summaries, but implied by the nature of bridge construction.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in the provided summaries, but implied by the need for a cost breakdown.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306118_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 29.9 KB

The contracting authority verifies subcontractors' background regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306118_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

Bidders must confirm agreement with tender conditions, complete the cost breakdown in Excel, and identify/justify trade secrets, submitting joint bid details if applicable.

HD IV KululoendXLS
HD IV Kululoend.xlsx -- 20.4 KB

This tender document contains a cost breakdown for the Tõdva bridge construction, required for detailed submission of the bid's cost.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306118_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on the construction cost of the Tõdva bridge, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306118_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.9 KB

The tender pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof instead of certificates from authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 34.0 KB

The tender's foundational document contains general information, procurement procedure rules, and bidder qualification conditions necessary for submitting a bid.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for bridge construction is generally well-structured with clear evaluation criteria and good data consistency. However, it lacks explicit technical capability requirements and has limited sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear CPV code, a defined procedure, and a reasonable timeline. No major legal issues were flagged.

Clarity80/100

The description of the work is clear, and the evaluation criteria (lowest price) are well-specified. The presence of foundation documents and specific forms contributes to clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the lack of explicitly detailed technical capability requirements and some unreadable document formats (zip) slightly impacts completeness.

Technical capability requirements not explicitly detailed.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission, disclosed value, and objective criteria. The focus on background checks for subcontractors is a good practice for reliability.

Practicality65/100

The use of e-submission and e-procurement enhances practicality. However, the contract start date is not specified, and the reliance on unreadable file formats for some documents could pose minor practical challenges.

Contract start date not specified.
Some essential documents in unreadable formats (.zip).
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields are populated, and the dates provided are logical. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, ensuring good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, but there are no specific social aspects or innovation focus detailed. It is also not indicated as EU funded.

No specific social criteria or innovation focus detailed.
Not specified if EU funded.

Strengths

Clear evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds are defined.
E-procurement and e-submission enabled.
Good data consistency.

Concerns

Technical capability requirements are not explicitly detailed.
Some tender documents are in unreadable formats (.zip).
Limited specifics on sustainability aspects beyond a general mention.

Recommendations

1. Explicitly detail technical capability requirements in future tenders.
2. Ensure all essential tender documents are provided in universally readable formats.
3. Provide more concrete details on sustainability and social aspects if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline