Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction and extension works of Haapsalu Water Centre building

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 22, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
305989
Value
€4,270,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of construction works100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 15, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 22, 2026

Tender Opening

April 22, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€4,270,000
Duration
16 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
81
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The aim of the procurement is the reconstruction works of the water centre building located at Lihula mnt 10a in Haapsalu, including the extension of the children's pool area. The reconstruction works will update the changing rooms and sanitary facilities of the water centre, as well as the building's envelope structures. In addition, the building's water supply and sewage, as well as heating and ventilation systems will be updated.
Green ProcurementEU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the Haapsalu Water Centre reconstruction and expansion is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible compliant bid while demonstrating strong technical capability and incorporating social value commitments. Proactive risk management and clear communication will be crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Delivering the most cost-effective, high-quality reconstruction and expansion of the Haapsalu Water Centre.

Ensuring minimal disruption and maximum community benefit through efficient project execution and social value integration.

Key Opportunities
Price-driven evaluation (100% weight) presents a clear path to maximizing score by submitting the lowest compliant bid.
The tender explicitly mentions 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Aspects', allowing for differentiation through well-defined and impactful commitments.
The project scope is clearly defined, allowing for detailed cost breakdown and efficient resource allocation.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost-saving measures without compromising quality or compliance, and leverage efficient supply chain management. Consider value engineering options that do not impact core functionality but reduce overall cost.

Ensuring all mandatory and eligibility requirements are met precisely to avoid disqualification.

Implement a rigorous document review process, assign dedicated personnel to check all forms and supporting documents against the tender requirements, and seek clarification from the contracting authority if any ambiguity exists.

The absence of 'Innovative Aspects' means the focus will be on traditional best practices and cost efficiency, limiting opportunities for technical differentiation.

Focus differentiation on the quality of the project team, the robustness of the proposed methodology for execution, and the strength of social value commitments.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced general contractor with a proven track record in public sector building reconstruction and expansion projects, particularly those involving water facilities. The ideal bidder will have a robust supply chain, efficient project management, and a strong understanding of cost optimization without compromising quality. They should also be adept at integrating social value initiatives into their project delivery.
Key Requirements
Bid cost price list (Vorm 3 pakkumuse maksumuse hinnatabel.xlsx)
Bid security guarantee letter (Vorm 4 pakkumuse tagatise garantiikiri.docx)
CVs of project manager, site manager, and strong current specialist with professional certificates (Vorm 7 pakkuja spetsialistid.docx)
Confirmation of compliance with all conditions and requirements (Vorm 1.docx)
Information about subcontractors
Trade secret information
Joint bid authorization (Vorm 6 ühispakkumuse volikiri.docx)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrating a clear and compelling cost-saving strategy that does not compromise the quality or longevity of the reconstructed facility.
Presenting a highly experienced and qualified project team with a proven track record in similar projects.
Offering well-defined and impactful social value initiatives that align with the contracting authority's objectives.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to providing local employment opportunities, prioritizing residents of Haapsalu and surrounding areas for a percentage of the workforce, particularly for unskilled and semi-skilled roles. Evidence: 'SOCIAL ASPECTS: Yes'.
Bid Focus Areas
Total cost of construction works100.0%

Achieve the lowest possible compliant bid. This requires meticulous cost estimation, efficient procurement of materials and subcontractors, and optimized labor deployment. Explore opportunities for value engineering that reduce cost without impacting essential functionality or quality. Ensure all costs are accurately reflected in Vorm 3 pakkumuse maksumuse hinnatabel.xlsx.

Recommendations7
Meticulous Cost Estimation and Pricing
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a highly accurate and competitive cost price list (Vorm 3). This involves detailed breakdown of all direct and indirect costs, including labor, materials, subcontractors, overheads, and profit. Leverage historical data from similar projects and obtain multiple quotes from suppliers and subcontractors to ensure the lowest possible compliant price.

Directly impacts the primary evaluation criterion, maximizing score if the bid is the lowest.
Optimize for Lowest Price
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weighting on cost, the entire bid strategy must revolve around achieving the lowest possible price while remaining fully compliant. This means scrutinizing every cost element and identifying efficiencies. Consider lean construction principles and efficient project planning to minimize waste and time.

Crucial for achieving maximum score in the evaluation.
Robust Project Team and Documentation
CriticalMed effort

Ensure CVs for the project manager, site manager, and key specialists are comprehensive, highlighting relevant experience and qualifications. Include copies of all required professional certificates. This demonstrates technical capability and builds confidence in the bidder's ability to execute the project successfully.

Essential for meeting technical capability requirements and demonstrating competence.
Integrate Local Employment and Training
HighMed effort

Propose specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) social value commitments. For example, commit to employing a certain percentage of local workforce, offering apprenticeships or training opportunities for unemployed individuals in the Haapsalu region. This directly addresses the 'Social Aspects' requirement.

Enhances bid attractiveness and potentially influences qualitative aspects if any minor weight is given to social value beyond compliance.
Thorough Compliance Check
HighMed effort

Implement a multi-stage review process for all submitted documents, forms (Vorm 1, Vorm 3, Vorm 4, Vorm 6, Vorm 7), and supporting information. Pay close attention to mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements to prevent disqualification. Seek clarification from the contracting authority on any ambiguous points.

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Subcontractor Management Plan
MediumMed effort

Develop a clear plan for managing subcontractors, including selection criteria, performance monitoring, and communication protocols. This information should be readily available and presented professionally as required.

Demonstrates organized project delivery and risk management.
Highlight Project Management Efficiency
MediumMed effort

While innovation is not a factor, emphasize the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed project management approach. This could include detailed scheduling, risk management strategies, and communication plans that assure the contracting authority of a smooth and timely project execution.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver on time and within budget.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the quality and longevity of the Haapsalu Water Centre. Emphasize a lean and efficient operational model that translates into savings for the contracting authority. Highlight the experience and reliability of the project team to assure successful delivery.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (2)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit a bid considering the contracting authority's conditions.
--Bidders must complete the provided price list (as per 305989_vastavustingimused.pdf).
--The tender is not divided into lots as the contracting authority aims to procure the general contracting of construction works, where the contractor is responsible for performing or organizing all types of construction works (as per Additional Info).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not have criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or financing of terrorism at the contract execution stage (as per 305989_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused.pdf).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit an application for participation in the procurement procedure, confirming the bid's compliance with all conditions and requirements (as per Vorm 1.docx).
--Bidders must provide information about subcontractors.
--Bidders must provide trade secret information.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid must include CVs of the project manager, site manager, and strong current specialist, along with their professional certificates (as per Vorm 7 pakkuja spetsialistid.docx).
--The scope of work includes updating building structures, water supply, sewage, heating, and ventilation systems (as per Pakkumuse_esitamise_ettepanek.pdf and Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus.docx).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit a bid cost price list (as per Vorm 3 pakkumuse maksumuse hinnatabel.xlsx).
--The bid will be evaluated based on the total cost of construction works, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score (as per 305989_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf).
--A bid security guarantee letter must be submitted with the bid (as per Vorm 4 pakkumuse tagatise garantiikiri.docx).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

12 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305989_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.9 KB

This document outlines the conditions under which subcontractors will be screened for criminal convictions related to fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing during the contract execution phase.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305989_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 15.7 KB

Bidders must submit a bid by accepting the contracting authority's conditions, providing subcontractor data and trade secret information, and completing the provided price table.

Vorm 1 Hankenetlusel osalemise avaldusDOC
Vorm 1.docx -- 19.7 KB

This form is an application to participate in the tender procedure, confirming the bid's compliance with all terms and requirements.

Vorm 3 pakkumuse maksumuse hinnatabelXLS
Vorm 3 pakkumuse maksumuse hinnatabel.xlsx -- 96.6 KB

The contracting authority requests a tender cost price list for the reconstruction and expansion works of the Haapsalu Water Centre.

Vorm 4 pakkumuse tagatise garantiikiriDOC
Vorm 4 pakkumuse tagatise garantiikiri.docx -- 16.1 KB

This document is a template for a bid security guarantee letter that must be submitted with the tender offer.

Vorm 7 Pakkuja spetsialistidDOC
Vorm 7 pakkuja spetsialistid.docx -- 18.8 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to submit Form 7, which includes CVs of the project manager, site manager, and electrical specialist along with their professional certificates.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305989_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on the total cost of construction works, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305989_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.5 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the company, containing the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats, but is not intended for completion itself.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 654.5 KB

This technical specification defines the content, scope, and requirements for the reconstruction and expansion works of Haapsalu Water Centre, serving as a foundational document for the works.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa_2_Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 49.5 KB

This document is a draft construction works contract, outlining general and specific conditions that detail the agreement, including contractor and client information, project and site details, and contractor obligations.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
Pakkumuse_esitamise_ettepanek.pdf -- 575.4 KB

Haapsalu Linna Spordibaasid OÜ invites bids for the reconstruction and expansion of the Haapsalu Water Centre, which includes updating building structures, water supply, sewage, and heating and ventilation systems.

Vorm 6 Ühispakkumuse volikiriDOC
Vorm 6 ühispakkumuse volikiri.docx -- 14.0 KB

This document is a joint bid authorization letter, empowering one bidder to act on behalf of others in the tender procedure.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

81
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the reconstruction and expansion of the Haapsalu Water Centre is well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. While strong on technical and legal aspects, it could benefit from a more explicit focus on innovation and further detailing of sustainability criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and the process seems well-defined. No disputes are flagged. The financing condition points to contract terms within supporting documents.

Clarity85/100

The description of the works is clear, and the technical specifications provide a good level of detail. Requirements are documented in various forms and specifications. The evaluation criteria are specified, although the 'lowest price' focus is notable.

Completeness80/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like technical specifications, contract drafts, and various forms are listed. However, the classification of 'Value Classified: Yes' might obscure the precise financial breakdown for bidders.

Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement with full document access. The estimated value is disclosed, and evaluation is based on relative weighting (though heavily skewed to price). Criteria appear objective, and deadlines are reasonable. No immediate red flags for tailoring to specific companies were detected.

Practicality75/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, which is positive. The contract start date is not explicitly stated but can be inferred from the duration and submission deadlines. Financing information is referenced in the contract project. The 16-month duration is clearly specified.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates provided for reveal, submission, and opening are logical and sequential.

Sustainability60/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Criteria' as characteristics, indicating some consideration for sustainability. However, specific requirements or weightings for these aspects are not detailed in the provided summaries, making it difficult to assess their practical impact. EU funding is also noted.

Lack of detailed sustainability requirements and weightings.

Strengths

Clear and detailed technical specifications.
Well-defined procurement procedure and e-submission.
Comprehensive set of required forms for bidders.
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration.

Concerns

Evaluation heavily weighted towards lowest price, potentially limiting focus on quality or innovation.
Limited explicit detail on how 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Criteria' will be evaluated.
Value Classified: Yes, may reduce transparency for bidders regarding the overall financial structure.

Recommendations

1. Provide more specific criteria or weightings for sustainability aspects.
2. Consider adding points for innovation or life-cycle costs in the evaluation to balance the price focus.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline