Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction of Jugapuu (Kesktee 65) playground

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
305820
Value
€190,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 24, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid price in euros (excluding VAT)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€190,000
Duration
9 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to conclude a procurement contract for the construction of the Kesktee 65 playground. More detailed conditions are in the procurement base documents.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the Jugapuu playground reconstruction is a price-driven opportunity with a strong emphasis on BIM compliance. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive cost management, meticulous adherence to BIM requirements, and demonstrating robust subcontractor vetting to mitigate exclusion risks.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and BIM-compliant solution for Jugapuu playground reconstruction.

Reliable execution through rigorously vetted partners and proven project management.

Key Opportunities
Leverage BIM expertise for efficient project planning and execution, potentially leading to cost savings.
Aggressively price the bid to secure the 100% weighting on cost.
Demonstrate proactive subcontractor management to avoid exclusion grounds.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize material sourcing, minimize overheads, and explore efficiencies in construction methods. Consider a slightly lower margin if confident in execution.

Ensuring complete and accurate BIM documentation and compliance.

Dedicate a BIM specialist to oversee the creation and submission of the BIM implementation plan and models. Conduct internal reviews to ensure all client requirements and templates are met.

Potential for subcontractor disqualification due to background checks.

Select subcontractors with a strong track record and transparent business practices. Request detailed documentation from them early in the process and conduct your own due diligence beyond the minimum requirements.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with proven experience in public infrastructure projects, specifically playground or park renovations, possessing strong BIM capabilities and a well-established network of reliable subcontractors. They must have a lean operational structure to offer a highly competitive price.
Key Requirements
Completed technical specification compliance table
Completed cost breakdown (Lisa 2 Kululoend) without alterations or conditions
BIM models and implementation plan according to provided technical conditions and requirements
Subcontractor background verification (fraud, money laundering, human trafficking)
List of models used and their formats, following BIM implementation plan
Key Discriminators
A highly optimized and lean cost structure that allows for a significantly lower bid price while maintaining quality.
A demonstrably superior BIM implementation plan that showcases advanced capabilities and efficiency gains.
A proactive and transparent approach to subcontractor vetting, providing more assurance than competitors.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to local employment or training opportunities within the project execution phase. This can be a subtle differentiator if other bidders do not address it.
Bid Focus Areas
Total bid price in euros (excluding VAT)100.0%

Achieve the lowest possible bid price through meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource allocation, and optimized construction methodologies. Every euro saved directly translates to maximum evaluation points.

Recommendations7
Meticulously Complete Technical Specification Compliance Table
CriticalHigh effort

Ensure every item in the technical specification compliance table is accurately addressed, with clear 'Yes' or 'No' answers and supporting evidence where required. Any ambiguity or omission can lead to disqualification.

Avoids mandatory disqualification and demonstrates thorough understanding of requirements.
Aggressively Price for 100% Cost Weighting
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct a granular cost analysis to identify all possible cost-saving opportunities. Benchmark against similar projects and consider a slightly reduced profit margin if confident in operational efficiency and volume.

Maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Develop a Robust and Compliant BIM Implementation Plan
CriticalHigh effort

Utilize the provided template (RHAD_Lisa 1.3) and ensure the plan details how BIM will be used throughout the project lifecycle, including model formats and coordination. Align this plan with the technical conditions and client requirements.

Meets a critical technical requirement and demonstrates capability, avoiding disqualification.
Proactive Subcontractor Due Diligence
CriticalMed effort

Go beyond the stated requirements for subcontractor background checks. Request detailed documentation and references, and conduct your own risk assessment to ensure no subcontractor will trigger exclusion grounds.

Prevents disqualification due to subcontractor issues and ensures project continuity.
Ensure Unaltered Cost Breakdown Submission
HighLow effort

Submit the 'Lisa 2 Kululoend' exactly as required, without any conditions, notes, or alterations. Any deviation can lead to disqualification.

Avoids mandatory disqualification due to submission format errors.
Highlight BIM Efficiency Gains in Proposal Narrative
MediumMed effort

While not directly scored, subtly weave into the narrative how your BIM approach will lead to fewer errors, better coordination, and potentially faster completion, indirectly supporting the cost-effectiveness.

Adds perceived value beyond just price and technical compliance.
Consider Local Employment/Training Commitment
LowLow effort

If feasible, include a brief statement about utilizing local labor or offering training opportunities as part of the project execution. This can be a positive, albeit unscored, element.

Potential positive impression on the contracting authority.
Competitive Positioning
Position your bid as the most financially astute and technically sound choice, emphasizing your ability to deliver the project at the lowest cost while meeting all BIM and compliance mandates. Highlight the reliability of your subcontractor vetting process as a key risk-reduction factor.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The tender is not divided into lots due to the technical complexity of contract execution and the need for cooperation and simultaneity of construction works for different lots.
--The tender pass is an initial confirmation of the entrepreneur's self-declaration, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected answers, but it is not filled out directly, but electronically.
--Bidders must submit the BIM implementation plan based on the provided template for the Jugapuu playground reconstruction project.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority verifies subcontractors' backgrounds regarding fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm compliance with all tender document conditions.
--Bidders must submit a completed technical specification compliance table as an Excel file.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost breakdown (Lisa 2 Kululoend) without alterations or conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders are required to prepare BIM models and submit an implementation plan according to the provided technical conditions and requirements.
--Bidders must submit a form listing all subcontractors to be used in the contract execution, including their data and the scope of subcontracting.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation method with a 100% weighting.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

14 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305820_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305820_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.6 KB

Bidders must confirm adherence to all tender document conditions and submit a completed technical specification compliance table in Excel format.

Pakkuja esitab täielikult täidetud Lisa 5. Tehnilisele kirjeldusele vastavuse ta...XLS
Lisa 5 Tehnilisele kirjeldusele vastavuse tab... -- 1.4 MB

The bidder must submit a completed table demonstrating that their offered products and materials comply with the requirements specified in the technical description.

Kas pakkuja kinnitab, et lisa 2. kululoendis on täidetud nõuetekohaselt iga rida...XLS
RHAD_Lisa 2 Kululoend.xlsx -- 27.3 KB

The bidder must confirm that Appendix 2 cost list is filled out correctly without modifications or conditions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305820_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.2 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the Jugapuu playground reconstruction tender, where the total bid price is the sole evaluation method with a 100% weighting.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305820_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.0 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and expected response formats, but it is filled out electronically, not directly.

RHAD_Hankemenetluse kordDOC
RHAD_Hankemenetluse kord.doc -- 101.5 KB

The procurement procedure rules outline the general terms, conditions, and submission requirements for the Jugapuu playground reconstruction tender.

RHAD_Lisa 1.2. BIM tehnilised tingimusedDOC
RHAD_Lisa 12 BIM tehnilised tingimused.docx -- 38.4 KB

The contracting authority requires the creation of BIM models and the submission of an implementation plan according to the provided technical conditions and requirements.

RHAD_Lisa 1.3. BIM rakenduskava alusmallDOC
RHAD_Lisa 13 BIM rakenduskava alusmall.docx -- 2.1 MB

This document provides the BIM implementation plan template for the Jugapuu playground reconstruction project, which is required for tender submission.

RHAD_Lisa 1.4. Esitatavate mudelite nimekirjadXLS
RHAD_Lisa 14 Esitatavate mudelite nimekirjad.... -- 24.5 KB

The bidder must submit lists of models used in the playground reconstruction project and their formats, adhering to the BIM implementation plan and the client's requirements.

RHAD_Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
RHAD_Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 1.2 MB

This technical specification defines the requirements for the reconstruction of the Jugapuu playground, based on the project, approvals, and applicable legislation.

RHAD_Lisa 3.1. Alltöövõtja kinnitusedDOC
RHAD_Lisa 31 Alltöövõtja kinnitused.docx -- 13.6 KB

The subcontractor must confirm that they do not have grounds for exclusion from the procurement procedure by submitting a corresponding confirmation.

RHAD_Lisa 3. Alltöövõtu kasutamise vormDOC
RHAD_Lisa 3 Alltöövõtu kasutamise vorm.docx -- 15.3 KB

The bidder must submit a form listing all subcontractors to be used in fulfilling the contract, including their details and the scope of subcontracting.

RHAD_Lisa 6. Ühispakkujate volikiri (vajadusel)DOC
RHAD_Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate volikiri (vajadusel... -- 22.9 KB

This power of attorney is required if a joint bidder submits a bid, to authorize one joint bidder to represent the others in the procurement procedure.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the reconstruction of the Jugapuu playground is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some documentation formats are not machine-readable.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV classification and a reasonable timeline. There are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period.

Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear objective and specifies that detailed conditions are in the base documents. Requirements for BIM models, cost breakdowns, and subcontractor confirmations are explicitly stated. The evaluation criteria are clearly defined as solely based on price.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the financing condition is stated as 'Toodud hankelepingu projektis' which implies the details are within an attached document, and the actual financing source is not explicitly detailed in the basic information. Several key documents are in formats not supported by AI analysis.

Financing details are referenced in an attached document rather than explicitly stated.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the evaluation is based on a single, objective criterion (price). Access to documents is provided, and the value is disclosed. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration. Financing information is referenced within the contract project document. The duration is clearly specified.

Contract start date is not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social responsibility considerations.

Strengths

Clear evaluation criteria (price-based).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Detailed technical requirements (BIM).
Well-defined exclusion and eligibility criteria.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria.
Some key documents are in non-analyzable formats.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific green and social procurement criteria.
2. Ensure all essential documents are in machine-readable formats.
3. Clearly state the contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline