Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction of Composting Field (Räpina Horticulture School)

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
305228
Value
€150,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 16, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€150,000
Duration
6 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The aim of the tender is to establish a modern asphalt-covered composting field with an area of 1000m2, including a wastewater infiltration field and access roads. The work also includes the construction of a PVC hall with an area of 80m2 for a composter.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for a composting facility construction is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on delivering a highly competitive, cost-optimized bid while meticulously addressing all technical and eligibility requirements. Demonstrating robust project management and compliance will be crucial for success.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Leadership through Optimized Construction: Delivering the required composting facility at the most competitive price by leveraging efficient construction methods and supply chain management.

Uncompromising Quality and Compliance: Ensuring all technical specifications and contractual obligations are met with precision, backed by a strong project management framework.

Reliable Execution and Timely Delivery: Guaranteeing the project is completed within the 6-month timeframe, minimizing disruption and ensuring operational readiness for Räpina Aianduskool.

Key Opportunities
Leveraging existing supplier relationships for cost savings on materials (asphalt, PVC, drainage components).
Streamlining construction methodology for the asphalted area and drainage system to reduce labor and time costs.
Early engagement with subcontractors to secure competitive pricing and availability, especially for specialized elements like the PVC hall construction.
Thorough understanding of the 'Ehitusprojekt_Kompostimisväljak' document to identify any potential cost-saving design optimizations or efficiencies that do not compromise functionality.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% evaluation weighting on bid price.

Conduct a granular cost analysis of the Bill of Quantities (BoQ), explore all possible efficiencies in labor, materials, and logistics. Consider lean construction principles and optimize site management to minimize waste and time.

Ensuring all mandatory exclusion grounds and subcontractor verification requirements are met meticulously, as failure can lead to disqualification.

Dedicate a specific team member to review and manage compliance documentation for all involved parties, including subcontractors. Proactively gather all necessary explanations and evidence for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking checks.

Potential for unforeseen site conditions or material price fluctuations during the 6-month project duration.

Include a reasonable contingency in the bid price for unforeseen circumstances, clearly stating any assumptions made in the bid. Secure material prices with suppliers where possible or factor in market volatility.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with proven experience in civil engineering projects, specifically those involving asphalt surfacing, drainage, and small-scale industrial building construction. The ideal bidder will have a strong track record of delivering projects within budget and on time, with a capable project management team and a clear understanding of Estonian construction regulations and procurement processes.
Key Requirements
Submission of a complete and accurate Tender Passport (ESPD)
Demonstration of technical capability via a qualified Project Manager with relevant experience
Final and all-inclusive bid price (excluding VAT)
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds and subcontractor verification
Adherence to the detailed Bill of Quantities (BoQ) in the bid form
Understanding and acceptance of the draft Works Contract terms
Key Discriminators
A detailed and transparent cost breakdown that clearly demonstrates value for money, even if not explicitly requested beyond the BoQ.
A highly experienced and certified project manager with a strong portfolio of similar successful projects, presented with clear evidence of their qualifications and experience.
A proactive approach to risk management and quality assurance, outlined in the bid, demonstrating foresight and commitment to project success.
A clear and concise presentation of the bid, making it easy for the contracting authority to understand the proposed solution and its cost-effectiveness.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects' are not explicitly mentioned, a bidder could voluntarily commit to prioritizing local labor for unskilled roles during construction, if feasible, to support the local economy of Räpina. This should be presented as an added value, not a mandatory requirement.
Bid Focus Areas
Total bid price100.0%

Achieve the lowest possible final price (excluding VAT) by meticulously costing the Bill of Quantities (BoQ), optimizing construction methods, and securing competitive material and labor rates. Ensure the bid price is final and includes all associated costs.

Recommendations7
Meticulous Tender Passport (ESPD) Completion
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the Tender Passport (ESPD) is completed accurately and comprehensively, serving as the primary self-declaration. Pay close attention to the contracting authority's specific conditions and expected response formats as outlined in 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega'.

Ensures eligibility and avoids immediate disqualification.
Aggressive Cost Optimization for Price Leadership
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weight on price, conduct an exhaustive cost-benefit analysis for every line item in the Bill of Quantities (BoQ). Explore all avenues for cost reduction through efficient construction techniques, bulk material purchasing, and optimized logistics without compromising quality or compliance.

Directly impacts the scoring and win probability.
Robust Project Manager Qualification and Experience
CriticalMed effort

Clearly present the qualifications and work experience of the designated Project Manager. Ensure they possess the required professional certificate and have managed at least two construction projects within the last 60 months, providing detailed evidence as requested.

Meets a critical technical capability requirement.
Proactive Subcontractor Due Diligence
HighMed effort

Thoroughly vet all proposed subcontractors for mandatory exclusion grounds (fraud, money laundering, human trafficking). Obtain all necessary explanations and evidence in advance to satisfy the contracting authority's verification process.

Prevents disqualification due to subcontractor issues.
Detailed Construction Methodology and Schedule
MediumMed effort

While not explicitly a scoring criterion, providing a clear, efficient, and realistic construction methodology and schedule can demonstrate competence and build confidence, especially when combined with a competitive price. Reference the 'Ehitusprojekt_Kompostimisväljak' and 'Töövõtulepingu projekt' to show understanding.

Enhances perceived value and reliability.
Clarify Ambiguities in Tender Documents
MediumLow effort

Review all tender documents, including the construction project and draft contract, for any potential ambiguities or areas requiring clarification. Submit formal clarification requests to the contracting authority well in advance of the submission deadline.

Reduces risk of misinterpretation and potential disputes.
Voluntary Local Employment Commitment
LowLow effort

Consider including a voluntary commitment to utilize local labor for unskilled positions during the construction phase, if feasible. Frame this as a contribution to the local community of Räpina, adding a positive social dimension to the bid.

Adds a positive, albeit non-scored, element to the bid.
Competitive Positioning
To gain a competitive advantage, focus on demonstrating superior cost efficiency through optimized construction processes and supply chain management. While price is paramount, a well-presented bid that clearly articulates how the lowest price is achieved without compromising quality or compliance will stand out. Highlight the experience and reliability of the project management team to build trust.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Tender documents include conformity conditions concerning joint bids, restrictions on the involvement of subcontractors, bid submission, and cost presentation requirements.
--The bid form document contains detailed lists of works and quantities, on the basis of which a financial bid for the construction of the composting area must be submitted.
--The tender documents contain details of the tender procedure, including the division of the tender contract into parts, submission of joint bids, confidentiality and language of bids, and the contracting authority's rights to reject bids.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority verifies subcontractors for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial evidence in lieu of certificates from authorities or third parties, containing the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.
--A power of attorney is required to authorize one joint bidder to represent all joint bidders in the tender procedure and contract execution.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Data on the responsible person (project manager) must be submitted, including their professional certificate and work experience in managing at least two construction projects within the last 60 months.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The contracting authority primarily evaluates bids based on the total cost of the bid, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305228_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305228_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.4 KB

Tender documents include compliance conditions addressing joint bids, subcontractor engagement restrictions, bid submission, and cost presentation requirements.

Lisa 1 Pakkumuse vormXLS
Lisa 1 Pakkumuse_vorm.xlsx -- 23.0 KB

This document is a tender form that includes detailed lists of works and quantities, on which a financial offer for the construction of a composting area must be based.

Andmed vastutava isiku osas (VORM)DOC
VORM_andmed vastutava isiku osas.docx -- 28.5 KB

The contracting authority requires information about the responsible person (project manager), including their professional certificate and work experience in managing at least two construction projects within the last 60 months.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305228_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.2 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the total bid price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305228_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.6 KB

The tender passport (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary proof instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Ehitusluba_2512271_01471_17032025PDF
Ehitusluba_2512271_01471_17032025.pdf -- 49.4 KB

This building permit approves the construction of a composting area and a PVC hall at Räpina School of Horticulture, which is necessary for the tender project's implementation.

LisateaveDOC
Lisateave.docx -- 34.8 KB

This document clarifies tender procedure details, including lotting, joint submissions, bid confidentiality and language, and the contracting authority's rights to reject bids.

Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Töövõtulepingu projekt.docx -- 62.9 KB

This draft works contract outlines the terms for constructing a composting area, including parties' obligations and deadlines, essential for tender participation.

Volikiri ühispakkujate esindamiseksDOC
Volikiri ühispakkujate esindamiseks.docx -- 28.7 KB

This power of attorney authorizes one joint bidder to represent all joint bidders in the tender procedure and contract execution.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the construction of a composting field is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and an objective evaluation criterion. However, there is limited information regarding sustainability aspects, and the practicality of submission could be improved by providing more accessible document formats.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a specified CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are provided and seem reasonable. No disputes are flagged. The presence of a building permit suggests regulatory compliance for the project itself.

Clarity80/100

The description of the construction project is clear, and key requirements such as the need for a project manager with specific experience are documented. The evaluation criteria are clearly stated as price-based. However, 'Additional Info' pointing to base documents necessitates accessing those for full understanding.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines. Several key documents are attached or linked. However, the AI analysis was hindered by .zip and .xml file formats, suggesting potential accessibility issues for some parts of the documentation.

Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness by disclosing the estimated value and using a clear, objective evaluation criterion (lowest price). Electronic submission is mandated, and all documents are generally accessible. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, which is a positive aspect.

Practicality65/100

The tender mandates e-submission and e-procurement, which are practical. However, the reliance on .zip and .xml file formats for some crucial project documents (like the construction project) might present practical challenges for bidders if not easily readable by standard software or the procurement platform.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are populated. Dates appear logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is clearly indicated.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, but there are no specific details or criteria outlined within the provided text or document summaries that detail how sustainability will be assessed or incentivized. Social aspects and innovation are not explicitly mentioned.

Lack of specific details on sustainability criteria

Strengths

Clear technical description and scope of work
Objective and transparent evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Inclusion of a building permit as part of the tender package

Concerns

Limited information on specific sustainability criteria despite mention of 'Green Procurement'
Potential accessibility issues with .zip and .xml file formats for key project documents
Lack of explicit mention of social aspects or innovation

Recommendations

1. Provide more detailed documentation on how 'Green Procurement' will be evaluated and applied.
2. Consider offering project-related documents in more universally accessible formats to enhance bidder practicality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline