Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Procurement of owner supervision for reconstruction works of project B2 for the reconstruction of the existing main building of Narva Hospital into a health and wellness center

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
304726
Value
€145,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of the bid100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2026

Tender Opening

April 21, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€145,000
Duration
54 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the public procurement is to conclude a mandate contract for the procurement of owner supervision for reconstruction works of project B2 for the reconstruction of the existing main building of Narva Hospital into a health and wellness center. A more detailed description of the service is provided in Annex 1 of the tender documents. This public procurement is considered a public procurement with a cross-border dimension, and the procurement notice will be submitted for publication to the OJEU.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for owner's supervision services for Narva Hospital's reconstruction is heavily weighted towards cost. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible compliant bid while demonstrating robust technical capability and adherence to all mandatory requirements, particularly the exclusion of Russian Federation-linked entities.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Compliance and Cost Leadership: Delivering the most cost-effective, fully compliant owner's supervision service for Narva Hospital's vital reconstruction.

Key Opportunities
Leverage the 100% cost-based evaluation to offer a highly aggressive price.
Demonstrate deep understanding of Estonian construction regulations and standards to assure the contracting authority of compliance.
Highlight experience in similar public sector reconstruction projects to build trust and confidence.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings without compromising quality or compliance. Explore lean operational models and efficient resource allocation.

Ensuring absolute adherence to the exclusion of Russian Federation-linked entities.

Implement a rigorous due diligence process for all potential subcontractors and suppliers. Obtain written declarations confirming no links to the Russian Federation.

Meeting all technical requirements comprehensively within a tight budget.

Develop a detailed project plan that clearly outlines how each technical requirement will be met efficiently and cost-effectively. Utilize technology for documentation and reporting where possible.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A specialized construction supervision firm with a proven track record in public sector projects, particularly healthcare or institutional buildings. The ideal bidder will have a lean operational structure allowing for competitive pricing, a strong understanding of Estonian construction law and standards, and a demonstrated commitment to ethical business practices.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of review and agreement to tender terms.
Possession of necessary rights to fulfill the contract.
No subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation.
Capability to provide owner's supervision for reconstruction works.
Ensuring compliance with current legislation and standards.
Documentation of fixed issues, solutions, and follow-up control.
Documentation of readiness for use, including defects and deadlines.
Responsibility for the table of execution documentation.
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably lowest compliant price.
A proactive and transparent approach to documentation and reporting.
A clear and verifiable commitment to ethical sourcing and exclusion of prohibited entities.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly requested, a bidder could voluntarily commit to prioritizing local labor for any non-supervisory support roles or to implement waste reduction measures during site visits, showcasing a broader commitment to responsible operations.
Bid Focus Areas
Total cost of the bid100.0%

Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy by meticulously analyzing all cost components, identifying efficiencies, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin to secure the contract. Ensure the price is fully compliant with all technical and legal requirements.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price for 100% Cost Weight
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weighting on cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible compliant bid. Conduct a granular cost breakdown to identify all areas for efficiency and cost reduction. Consider the long-term relationship value and potential for future work when setting the profit margin.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Rigorous Due Diligence on Russian Federation Links
CriticalMed effort

Implement a strict vetting process for all potential subcontractors and suppliers to ensure absolute compliance with the exclusion requirement. Obtain signed declarations from all parties involved, confirming no direct or indirect links to the Russian Federation.

Avoids mandatory exclusion and ensures bid validity.
Comprehensive Review of Tender Documents
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly review all tender documents, including Annex 1 (Technical Specification) and Form 2 (Technical Design Documentation Table), to ensure a complete understanding of the scope and requirements. Confirm agreement to all terms and conditions as required.

Ensures full compliance and avoids disqualification.
Demonstrate Expertise in Estonian Construction Law
HighMed effort

Clearly articulate the bidder's experience and understanding of current Estonian legislation and construction standards within the bid submission. This can be done through CVs of key personnel and a statement of methodology.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to meet technical requirements.
Proactive Documentation and Reporting Plan
MediumMed effort

Outline a clear, efficient, and technologically enabled plan for documentation and reporting, covering fixed issues, readiness for use, and execution documentation. Emphasize accuracy, timeliness, and accessibility of information.

Sets the bidder apart by demonstrating a structured and professional approach to a key responsibility.
Contingency Planning for Scope Changes
HighLow effort

While not explicitly stated, reconstruction projects can involve unforeseen issues. Briefly mention a proactive approach to managing potential scope changes or unforeseen site conditions within the technical proposal, demonstrating foresight.

Reduces perceived risk for the contracting authority.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective and compliant solution, emphasizing a lean operational model that allows for aggressive pricing without compromising the quality of supervision. Highlight a strong understanding of local regulations and a commitment to transparency in all aspects of the service.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (5)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-21 12:00:00.
--The duration of the contract is 54 months.
--A declaration of business secrets may be required.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation shall be involved.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidder must confirm they have reviewed the tender documents and agree to the terms.
--Bidder must possess the necessary rights to fulfill the contract.
--If a joint bid, a power of attorney for joint bidders must be provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The service provider must be capable of providing owner's supervision for reconstruction works.
--The service provider must ensure compliance with current legislation and standards.
--The service provider will be responsible for documenting fixed issues, their solutions, and follow-up control during the reconstruction works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The estimated value of the contract is 145,000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

13 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
304726_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.6 KB

The bidder must confirm the exclusion of subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation, and provide a power of attorney for joint bidders and a business secret explanation if applicable.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304726_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score, and other bids calculated proportionally.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304726_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 81.8 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not a document intended for completion itself.

RHADDOC
B2_OJV_HANKE_HD_29012026.docx -- 23.5 KB

The contracting authority is seeking a provider for owner's supervision services for the reconstruction works of Narva Hospital's B2 project, which involves the construction of a health and wellness center.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
B2_OJV_HANKE_HD_LISA_1_29012026.docx -- 32.0 KB

The contracting authority seeks an owner's supervision service provider for the reconstruction of Narva Hospital's main building into a health and wellness center, requiring compliance with current legislation and standards.

Lisa 2 PAKKUMUSE MAKSUMUSE VORMDOC
B2_OJV_HANKE_HD_LISA_2_29012026.docx -- 14.2 KB

The contracting authority invites bids for owner's supervision services for Narva Hospital reconstruction works, requiring the completion of the provided cost form.

Lisa 3 Hankelepingu eelnõuDOC
B2_OJV_HANKE_HD_LISA_3_29012026.docx -- 23.6 KB

This document is a draft of the service contract for the owner's supervision of the Narva Hospital reconstruction works, defining the contract terms and parties' obligations.

Lisa 5 AvaldusDOC
B2_OJV_HANKE_HD_LISA_5_29012025.docx -- 12.7 KB

The application confirms that the bidder has reviewed the tender documents, agrees to the terms, and possesses the necessary rights to fulfill the contract.

Lisa 6 Ühispakkuja volikiriDOC
B2_OJV_HANKE_HD_LISA_6_29012026.docx -- 12.7 KB

This power of attorney authorizes one joint bidder to represent all joint bidders in the procurement procedure and contract-related activities.

Vorm 1 EHITUSTÖÖDE ÜLEVAATUSE TABELXLS
B2_OJV_TEHNILISE_KIRJELDUSE_VORM_1_29012026.x... -- 10.6 KB

The submitted table is a construction work inspection form that documents identified issues, their resolutions, and follow-up inspection results during the owner's supervision of reconstruction works for project B2.

Vorm 2 PROJEKTEERIMISE TEHNILISE DOKUMENTATSIOONI TABELXLS
B2_OJV_TEHNILISE_KIRJELDUSE_VORM_2_29012026.x... -- 36.6 KB

This document lists the designations and descriptions of technical design documentation for various parts of the construction project.

Vorm 3 EHITUSTÖÖDE KASUTUSEVALMIDUSE ÜLEVAATUSE TABELXLS
B2_OJV_TEHNILISE_KIRJELDUSE_VORM_3_29012026.x... -- 10.7 KB

This document is a table used for documenting and recording the readiness inspection of construction works, including room conditions, identified defects, and their rectification deadlines.

Vorm 4 TÄITEDOKUMENTATSIOONI TABELXLS
B2_OJV_TEHNILISElKIRJELDUSE_VORM_4_29012026.x... -- 13.2 KB

This document lists the execution documentation table for construction project B2 reconstruction works, including necessary acts and drawings.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for owner's supervision services for the Narva Hospital reconstruction is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could benefit from more detailed technical specifications.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements for public procurement, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. No disputes or suspensions are noted. The classification as an international threshold procurement is appropriate given the likely value.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the purpose of the reconstruction is well-defined. Key requirements are documented, and the evaluation criteria (primarily cost) are specified. Conditions for participation are also outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and tender validity. However, the specific start date of the contract is not explicitly stated, and while documents are listed, the depth of detail within some technical specification documents could be enhanced.

Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable, and the evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price). E-procurement is utilized. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting fairness.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a URL for the e-procurement portal is provided. The contract duration is specified. Financing information is not detailed, and the contract start date is not explicitly stated, which slightly impacts practicality.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent throughout the tender information.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While it is EU funded (implied by international threshold), specific sustainability goals are absent.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
Absence of social responsibility considerations

Strengths

Clear description of services required
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Well-defined CPV code and NUTS code

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Contract start date not specified
Potential for more detailed technical specifications

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific green or social procurement criteria.
2. Clarify the expected contract start date.
3. Consider adding more detailed technical requirements or examples within the technical specification document.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline