Skip to main content
Tenders

Dynamic Purchasing System for Ordering Catering Services for Municipal Kindergartens and Daycares

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
304040
Value
€90,000,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 12, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€90,000,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€2,220,428
Avg. Bids
3.2
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
67%
182 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Related procurements will be carried out under the dynamic purchasing system for ordering catering services for Tallinn's municipal kindergartens and daycares. In accordance with Section 1, Paragraph 1 of Tallinn's Procurement Regulations, the Tallinn Education Department is the central procurer for organizing public procurements of catering services for municipal kindergartens and daycares within the meaning of the Public Procurement Act.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--The ESPD must be completed electronically.
--Bids will be evaluated based on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated, but implied through the need to complete the ESPD.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must complete the ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) electronically.
--Must meet the conditions set by the contracting authority.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated, but implied through the need to provide catering services.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated, but implied through the bidding process and cost evaluation.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304040_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 9.2 KB

The tender evaluates the cost of catering services for different kindergarten groups, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304040_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.9 KB

This document explains the completion of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) and includes the contracting authority's conditions that companies must electronically fulfill to participate in a dynamic procurement for catering services.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This dynamic procurement system for kindergarten catering services in Tallinn is generally well-structured, featuring electronic submission and clear evaluation criteria, though lacks explicit sustainability considerations and specific contract duration.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general regulatory compliance, with a clear procedure for dynamic procurement and a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable, and no disputes are indicated. The procedure type (DP) is appropriate for this context.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, outlining the purpose and the contracting authority's role. Requirements, particularly regarding ESPD completion, are documented. The evaluation criteria are specified, focusing on cost, which is clearly defined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including an estimated value and deadlines. However, the specific contract duration is not explicitly stated, which is a notable omission. Key documents are mentioned, though some technical formats are not AI-analyzable.

Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through electronic submission and e-procurement, ensuring broad access. Objective criteria (lowest price) are used for evaluation. Full document access is implied, and the value is disclosed.

Practicality65/100

The requirement for electronic submission and e-procurement enhances practicality. However, the lack of specified contract start date and details on financing limits the practicality score. The dynamic procurement system itself is a practical approach for ongoing service needs.

Missing contract start date
Lack of specific financing details
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and estimated value are well-populated. Dates are logical and consistent. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While it is EU funded (implied by ESPD and WTO/GPA characteristics), specific sustainability goals are absent, leading to a moderate score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear electronic submission process
Well-defined CPV code and location
Objective cost-based evaluation criteria
Dynamic procurement system for flexibility

Concerns

Missing contract duration
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Absence of contract start date

Recommendations

1. Specify the contract duration clearly.
2. Integrate sustainability criteria (e.g., green sourcing, social impact) into the evaluation.
3. Provide the contract start date for better planning.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline