Skip to main content
Tenders

Lift Modernisation Multi-Disciplinary Consultancy

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
020782-2026
Value
£60,000
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 17, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£60,000
Duration
19 months
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Lift Modernisation Multi-Disciplinary Consultancy - for the two multi-storey car parks in Camberley.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for lift modernization consultancy is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. No disputes are reported. The deadline, while potentially short, is within a reasonable range for a below-threshold open competition. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear and concise. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are listed, indicating a structured approach. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The submission deadline and contract start date are specified. However, the lack of content for the tender documents is a significant omission, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. There are no immediate indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of e-submission is a minor detractor from optimal fairness.

Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly defined. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the absence of e-submission reduces practicality. The availability of documents via URL is not confirmed, which could impact ease of access.

No e-submission
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are consistent and do not present any apparent contradictions.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and CPV code disclosed
Open competition procedure

Concerns

No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
Deadline may be too short
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria for submissions.
2. Provide full content for all tender documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation aspects.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline