Conseil Multidisciplinaire pour la Modernisation des Ascenseurs

This tender for lift modernization consultancy is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting its overall quality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. No disputes are reported. The deadline, while potentially short, is within a reasonable range for a below-threshold open competition. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the service is clear and concise. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are listed, indicating a structured approach. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The submission deadline and contract start date are specified. However, the lack of content for the tender documents is a significant omission, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. There are no immediate indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of e-submission is a minor detractor from optimal fairness.

The contract start date and duration are clearly defined. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the absence of e-submission reduces practicality. The availability of documents via URL is not confirmed, which could impact ease of access.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are consistent and do not present any apparent contradictions.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.