Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Laboratory supplies

Open
Deadline
23 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
303104
Value
€117,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 25, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total Cost98%
Climate and Environmental Impact Reduction Goal2%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Tender Opening

April 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€117,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€80,024
Avg. Bids
1.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
518 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is the purchase of laboratory supplies for the regional hospital.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for laboratory supplies presents a moderate competition opportunity. Success hinges on a cost-competitive bid that demonstrably aligns with the contracting authority's stated environmental goals, even though 'Green Procurement' is not explicitly mandated. Thoroughly addressing all technical and submission requirements, particularly product specifications and samples, is critical.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective Solutions with Proven Quality

Commitment to Environmental Responsibility

Reliable Supply Chain for Critical Laboratory Needs

Key Opportunities
Leverage the 'lowest price' evaluation factor by offering competitive pricing, while ensuring quality is not compromised.
Highlight any existing environmental initiatives or certifications to gain an advantage, even if not a mandatory requirement.
Thoroughly document product compliance with tender specifications to avoid technical disqualification.
Utilize the Hankepass (ESPD) to clearly demonstrate eligibility and avoid any administrative hurdles.
Key Challenges
Lack of explicit evaluation criteria weighting makes it difficult to optimize bid strategy.

Focus on excelling in all stated requirements, particularly cost and environmental aspects, as these are explicitly mentioned as giving an advantage. Assume a significant weighting for cost given the nature of the tender.

The tender does not specify a duration, which could lead to uncertainty in long-term planning and pricing.

In the cost form, consider offering tiered pricing or clearly stating assumptions about the expected contract duration. If possible, seek clarification during the clarification period.

The absence of 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Aspects' as explicit requirements might lead bidders to overlook these areas, creating an opportunity for differentiation.

Proactively include information on environmental impact reduction goals and any relevant social value initiatives, as this is explicitly mentioned as a factor that will give an advantage.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established supplier of laboratory consumables with a strong track record in the Estonian market, possessing a diverse product portfolio that can meet the regional hospital's needs. The ideal bidder will have robust quality control processes, a clear understanding of public procurement regulations, and a proactive approach to environmental sustainability, even if not a primary evaluation criterion.
Key Requirements
Submission of completed Hankepass (tender pass) electronically.
Submission of manufacturer's technical specifications for all offered products.
Submission of a technical description of the offered products.
Submission of product samples in their original packaging.
Submission of a completed cost form with detailed pricing and technical parameters.
Products must comply with the requirements stated in the tender documents.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable cost savings beyond just the lowest unit price (e.g., bulk discounts, efficient delivery).
Proactive and quantifiable environmental impact reduction goals that exceed basic compliance.
Exceptional product quality and reliability, supported by strong manufacturer warranties and certifications.
A highly responsive and efficient customer service and supply chain management system.
Social Value Opportunities
Include a commitment to sourcing from local Estonian manufacturers where feasible, supporting the local economy.
Outline a plan for responsible disposal or recycling of packaging materials used for product delivery.
Bid Focus Areas
Total CostHigh (assumed)

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify opportunities for competitive pricing. Explore economies of scale and efficient logistics to minimize overall cost to the contracting authority. Ensure all costs are transparently detailed in the cost form.

Company's Climate and Environmental Impact Reduction GoalsHigh (implied)

Clearly articulate and quantify the bidder's environmental goals. Provide evidence of past performance or future plans for reducing carbon footprint, waste, and energy consumption. This can be a significant differentiator.

Technical Compliance and Product QualityCritical

Meticulously match all product specifications to the tender requirements. Provide comprehensive manufacturer data and detailed technical descriptions. Ensure samples are representative of the offered quality and meet all stated criteria.

Recommendations6
Meticulously Complete Hankepass (ESPD)
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the Hankepass is filled out accurately and completely electronically. This is the initial gateway to the tender. Any errors or omissions here can lead to disqualification.

Ensures eligibility and allows the bid to proceed to evaluation.
Optimize Pricing for Lowest Total Cost
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct a granular cost analysis to identify opportunities for competitive pricing. Factor in potential economies of scale and efficient logistics. Ensure all costs are clearly itemized in the cost form.

Directly impacts the evaluation score and increases the likelihood of winning based on price.
Quantify Environmental Impact Reduction Goals
HighMed effort

Develop and clearly present specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals for reducing climate and environmental impact. Provide evidence of current initiatives or future plans.

Provides a competitive advantage as this is explicitly mentioned as a factor giving an advantage.
Provide Comprehensive Technical Documentation and Samples
CriticalHigh effort

Submit detailed manufacturer technical specifications and a clear technical description for each offered product. Ensure submitted samples are in original packaging and accurately represent the offered goods.

Ensures technical compliance and avoids disqualification on technical grounds.
Seek Clarification on Tender Duration
MediumLow effort

If possible, use the tender clarification period to inquire about the expected duration of the framework agreement. This will help in providing more accurate long-term pricing and supply chain planning.

Reduces uncertainty and allows for a more robust and accurate bid.
Incorporate Local Sourcing and Sustainable Packaging Commitments
MediumLow effort

Include a statement about prioritizing local suppliers where feasible and outlining a plan for responsible waste management of packaging materials. This adds value beyond the core requirements.

Enhances the bid's appeal and demonstrates corporate responsibility.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as offering the best value for money by combining competitive pricing with guaranteed quality and reliability, supported by strong technical documentation.
Emphasize the bidder's commitment to environmental sustainability, even if not a mandatory requirement, by showcasing concrete reduction goals and initiatives.
Highlight the bidder's ability to ensure a consistent and reliable supply chain for critical laboratory consumables, minimizing disruption for the regional hospital.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

20 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (10)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--Bidders must submit the Hankepass electronically.
--Bidders must submit manufacturer's technical data.
--Bidders must submit an application for participation in the tender procedure.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated in provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit a completed Hankepass (tender pass) as initial proof of meeting qualification requirements.
--Bidders must submit a completed application for participation in the tender procedure.
--Bidders must confirm they have received all necessary information, reviewed the conditions, and agree to the tender documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit manufacturer's technical specifications for the products.
--Bidders must submit a technical description of the offered products.
--Bidders must submit samples of the products in their original packaging.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 117,000.0 EUR.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost form with detailed information on offered laboratory supplies, quantities, prices, and other technical parameters.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
303104_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 44.3 KB

Bidders must submit manufacturer's technical data, application to participate in the tender, technical specification, and cost form to prove product compliance and submit a bid.

Pakkuja esitab vormi kohase hankementluses osalemise avalduse.DOC
303104 Hankemenetluses osalemise avaldus.docx -- 50.9 KB

Bidders must submit a form-compliant application to participate in the procurement, confirming they have received all necessary information, reviewed the terms, and agree to the tender documents.

Pakkuja on esitanud täidetud maksumusvormi.XLS
303104 Maksumusvorm.xlsx -- 32.7 KB

Bidders must submit a completed cost form detailing the offered laboratory supplies, quantities, prices, and other technical parameters.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud tehnilise kirjelduse - pakkumusvormi.DOC
303104 Tehniline kirjeldus - pakkumusvorm.doc... -- 66.1 KB

The bidder must submit a completed technical specification - offer form along with product samples in original packaging, which meet the requirements set forth in the tender documents.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
303104_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 15.5 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids based on total cost and the company's climate and environmental impact reduction goals, with the lowest price and proven environmental objectives providing an advantage.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
303104_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.6 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator serving as preliminary evidence of meeting the qualification requirements set by the contracting authority, and it is to be filled out electronically.

Raamlepingu projektDOC
303104 Riigihanke raamleping.docx -- 52.6 KB

This document is a framework agreement draft that defines the terms for making purchases within the public procurement of medical supplies and economic materials.

Turu-uuringu kokkuvõteDOC
Laboritarvikute turu-uuringu tagasiside kokku... -- 15.9 KB

This market research summary provides an overview of laboratory supply tender conditions, highlighting the clarity of technical requirements, market situation, suggestions for requirement modifications, and aspects of delivery and pricing.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for laboratory supplies is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria beyond cost and environmental impact, and the contract duration is not specified.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement procedures, including the use of CPV codes and a clear submission process. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The procedure type is standard. The main weakness is the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria beyond cost and environmental impact, which could be a procedural oversight.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria beyond cost and environmental impact.
Clarity80/100

The description of the tender's objective is clear. Requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and submission are well-documented through the AI-extracted requirements and document summaries. The conditions for participation are also clearly outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and organization details. However, the contract duration is missing, which is a significant omission for planning purposes. The number of attached documents is stated, and their types are generally clear.

Contract duration is not specified.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The value is disclosed, and criteria, while not fully detailed, are objective (cost and environmental impact). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a good level of fairness.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, which enhances practicality. However, the contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration of the contract is also missing, impacting practical planning for bidders.

Contract start date is not specified.
Financing information is absent.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logical and sequential. The tender validity period is also specified.

Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, indicating a focus on environmental aspects. However, there are no specific social criteria or innovation focuses mentioned, and it is not indicated as EU funded.

No specific social criteria mentioned.
No specific innovation focus mentioned.

Strengths

Clear description of tender objective.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable submission deadlines.
Disclosure of estimated value.
Inclusion of Green Procurement characteristic.

Concerns

Missing contract duration.
Missing contract start date.
Lack of explicit evaluation criteria beyond cost and environmental impact.
Absence of financing information.

Recommendations

1. Specify the contract duration and start date.
2. Provide a more detailed breakdown of evaluation criteria, including weighting if applicable.
3. Include information on financing sources.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline