Skip to main content
Tenders

Use of EO data to calculate severe weather thresholds

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
019202-2026
Value
£25,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 19, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£25,000
Duration
4 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Joint Nature Conservation Committee The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) is the statutory adviser to the UK Government and devolved administrations on UK and international nature conservation Project Aims The overarching aim of this project is to develop an improved approach for using Earth Observation (EO) or other publicly accessible data to demonstrate whether ground at a specific location is frozen or has snow cover, with a reasonable level of accuracy and consistency. To achieve this the project will need to explore data available, issues regarding its use for this purpose, and comparative results from trialling different approaches. A secondary aim of this project is to provide JNCC with confidence that the proposed method is effective, and equipping JNCC with evidence that outcomes resulting from use of the approach are robust to stand up to potential challenge. Project Background JNCC runs the 'Severe Weather Scheme' (SWS), to provide a trusted mechanism to advise on the restriction of shooting of wildfowl and waders for conservation purposes during extended periods of severe weather, specifically when ground is frozen or snow covered. During such periods birds are naturally more vulnerable as it is harder for them to feed, whilst at the same time their energy requirements for survival are high. JNCC runs the scheme in collaboration and consultation with the country nature conservation bodies, environmental NGOs and shooting organisations. Information from the scheme is used to inform the Secretary of State, who has the power to impose a statutory suspension of shooting activities in all or part of GB under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 Section 2(6). The Severe Weather Scheme monitors temperatures annually to determine if a suspension of shooting activities is advised. The scheme runs during the open season for shooting any of the relevant species, i.e. the period from 7th November to 20th February. In addition to providing information to inform statutory suspensions of shooting, the scheme also advises wildfowlers on 'voluntary restraint of shooting' and wider guidance on activities that could disturb birds such as watersports and dog walking. The SWS has been running since the early 1980s. Criteria as to what severity of freezing weather should trigger voluntary restraint or a statutory suspension was originally agreed by a working group comprised of ornithological and data experts from the British government's nature conservation advisory body, and non-governmental organisations representing shooting and conservation interest. The agreed criteria relied on manual daily checks at a selection of weather stations as to whether ground was frozen or covered in snow. In 2001, with increasing automation of weather stations, the manual checks were replaced with automated temperature threshold readouts of grass and air temperature, as a proxy to indicate frozen or snow covered ground. For many years the SWS has operated using these data provided by the Met Office, but the Met Office are now stopping the provision of these data, so an alternative approach is required. JNCC has done some preliminary light touch investigation of the feasibility of using data from Earth Observation (EO) and other sources as an alternative to data collected in situ by a network of Met Office ground weather stations. JNCC has piloted use of EU METOSAT Land Surface Temperature (LST) data in combination with Met Office forecast air temperature, but has noticed accuracy and consistency issues in the approach trialled. JNCC's initial investigations will be provided to the successful contractor to consider and inform their review and further investigation. Specific details of the criteria currently used in the SWS are available on the JNCC website. In essence, the SWS may trigger a shooting suspension - either voluntary or statutory - based on whether more than half of a network of weather stations in England/Wales (considered as a single unit) and/or Scotland report 'frozen' conditions (i.e. grass temperature below -2°C and air temperature below 1°C) for a set number of consecutive days or more, allowing for some short periods of thaw in between. Knowledge and experience of EO datasets and data processing is essential for this contract. Ornithological expertise is less important, noting that we are not proposing changing the core criteria of what would trigger action, merely focussed on investigating alternative options for how we judge if the criteria have been met. JNCC can provide the limited ornithological input that may be relevant to consider, for example on the optimal geographic locations to consider to replace the existing weather station network. The total budget available for this project including VAT is £25,000. Project Objectives Objective 1 - Reviewing data sources To review data sources that are available to meet the project aim. The data sources must have the following features: • Effective in assessing ground state: Currently the scheme uses data for both air temperature and grass/ground temperature as a proxy for frozen or snow covered ground to achieve this robust assessment. Data sources may replace this information or include other relevant metrics. • Low cost: The data sources must be easily obtainable at low cost or free at point of access. • Timeliness: Data relating to the state of the ground that morning or over the course of the previous night should ideally be available before 10:00 each day to facilitate timely decision-making. The current scheme requires continuous recordings of night-time temperatures specifically between 21:00 each night to 09:00 the following morning. • Location: The scheme must provide localised data covering England, Wales and Scotland. The existing SWS uses point locations at a network of Met Office weather stations currently used in the scheme, but there is flexibility around this going forwards. • Transparent: Since the outcomes from this scheme may influence legislative action, it is important that the data it is based on is from a trusted/transparent source and open to scrutiny. Ideally the data would be in the public domain, or at least available to the public at low cost. • Archival capability: Data must be archived for reference. We note, that JNCC have considered the option of setting up a new manual scheme using volunteers or contractors to take manual ground state observations daily through the season, but has ruled this out due to issues such as the cost and risk of data disruption (e.g. if volunteers were ill). Objective 2 - Trialling and evaluating approaches To trial use of the most promising data source(s) and evaluate how effective they are at assessing the state of the ground, and how similar the outcomes for the SWS would be. Data from the current scheme is available for use in back casting comparisons. Project Objectives: Detailed Tasks Objective 1 detailed tasks: A light touch literate review is required. The search strategy and information to be recorded from each paper or data sources should be proposed to JNCC at the start-up meeting, for input and agreement, before work commences. JNCC will provide the successful bidder with their initial scoping work to build on. It would also be welcomed if the contractor could draw on their own expert EO knowledge. Where possible, the review methodology should align with the 'quick scoping review' and/or 'rapid evidence review' guidance provided at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-production-of-quick-scoping-reviews-and-rapid-evidence-assessments The list of papers and data sources screened, included/excluded, and any relevant raw notes relating to each paper reviewed should be shared as an output. In addition, findings should be written up into a short summary that could be included within a technical report at a later date if required. Objective 2 detailed tasks: The contractor must carry out trials using data to evaluate the effectiveness of the most promising approach(s). The number of approaches to consider should be informed by the outcome of the literature review and the contractors expert opinion of the approaches that are most likely to be successful. The approaches to be considered should also be agreed with JNCC before detailed work commences. The contractor will need to familiarise themselves with the criteria used in the existing approach for the SWS and how it is applied. One approach is that alternative datasets will provide outputs that mimic the current criteria of grass temperature

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (12)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text. However, the tender is 'Open' type.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Knowledge and experience of EO datasets and data processing is essential.
--Ornithological expertise is less important, but JNCC can provide limited ornithological input.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS12
--Ability to develop an improved approach for using Earth Observation (EO) or other publicly accessible data to demonstrate ground freezing or snow cover.
--Ability to explore available data, issues regarding its use, and comparative results from trialling different approaches.
--Ability to provide JNCC with confidence that the proposed method is effective and robust.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total budget available for this project including VAT is £25,000.
--Value: 25000 EUR

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for using EO data to calculate severe weather thresholds is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable budget. Key areas for improvement include the availability of tender documents and the specification of evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for below-threshold procurements. The CPV code is provided, and the procedure is open competition. However, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could be a minor concern for legal compliance in some jurisdictions, though less critical for below-threshold tenders.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The project aims, background, and objectives are clearly articulated, providing a good understanding of the required work. The essential technical requirements are also well-defined, particularly regarding EO data processing and the need for robust methodology.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the critical issue of zero available tender documents with content significantly impacts completeness, preventing a full assessment of requirements and process.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The requirements are focused on technical expertise (EO data processing) rather than specific company capabilities, which is positive. The lack of explicit evaluation criteria is a minor concern for transparency.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The contract duration of 4 months and start date are specified. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and financing details reduces practicality. The lack of document URLs also hinders easy access for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract start date is shortly after the submission deadline, which is reasonable.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project aims and background
Well-defined technical requirements
Open competition procedure
Disclosed estimated value

Concerns

No tender documents available with content
Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission mechanism specified

Recommendations

1. Provide access to full tender documentation.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Clarify the submission process, ideally through an e-procurement platform.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline