Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login19 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
9 documents available with AI summaries
Bidders must confirm compliance with conditions, submit the bid according to the structure, declare trade secrets, and confirm the origin of subcontractors.
The contracting authority evaluates catering service bids primarily based on cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.
The tender pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.
This addendum defines the terms for personal data processing during the execution of the procurement contract, ensuring compliance with GDPR requirements.
The contracting authority seeks a catering company to provide meals for students and staff at Räpina School of Horticulture, requiring the service provider to ensure healthy, diverse, and age-appropriate food options while adhering to all relevant health and hygiene regulations.
The tender document describes the existing inventory and equipment required for providing catering services, the suitability of which the bidder must ensure.
This document outlines the 2026 spring semester academic schedule for Räpina School of Horticulture, including student numbers per course, essential for planning catering services.
The draft contract outlines the terms for providing catering services to Räpina School of Horticulture, including the scope of service and integral parts of the contract.
This document outlines the special procedure for social and special services, which is important for the procurement of catering services at Räpina Horticulture School.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for catering services at Räpina Aianduskool is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of e-submission could be improved.
The tender appears to comply with standard procurement procedures, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear, albeit short, submission deadline. The procedure type (SE) suggests a negotiated procedure, which is allowed. No disputes are indicated. The mention of 'R' type and 'SE' procedure code suggests adherence to national procurement law.
The description of the service is clear, outlining the need for catering for students and staff on academic days. Requirements are documented in various annexes, and the evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, primarily based on cost. Conditions for participation are also outlined.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration type, and contract start date. However, the 'Tender Valid' duration (4 months) is a bit short for a service contract and might require clarification on its implications for the contract duration itself. Not all documents are explicitly marked as 'Required' in the AI extraction, which could lead to confusion.
The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. The evaluation criteria are objective (primarily cost). The decision not to divide the tender into lots is justified by the contracting authority as ensuring efficient and economical use of funds and simplifying contract monitoring, which is a reasonable argument. Full document access is implied through the e-procurement platform.
E-submission is mandated. A contract start date is provided, and financing is implied through the estimated value. However, the AI-extracted requirements mention 'document URL' which is not explicitly detailed in the provided text, and the contract start date is presented as 'expected' in the performance conditions, which could create ambiguity. The duration type is 'PERIOD' but the specific contract duration is not explicitly stated beyond the tender validity.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically ordered, with reveal, submission, and opening dates following a standard sequence. The contract start date is provided, although with a note about it being expected.
There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This is a significant area for improvement.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required