Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase of firewood for the Agency "Social Care Center "Ziedugravas"

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
167898
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Zemgale, Latvia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Zemgale
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€160,194
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
95%
4,915 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of firewood for the Agency "Social Care Center "Ziedugravas"

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--[Submission deadline: 2026-04-02T10:00:00]
--[Other necessary documents are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Exclusion conditions are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Selection criteria are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Technical proposal requirements are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Financial proposal requirements are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167898_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260318135240.pdf -- 96.3 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the procurement of firewood for the "Sociālās aprūpes centrs "Ziedugravas"" agency, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and other necessary documents.

NolikumsDOC
Malka_Ziedugravas_Nolikums.docx -- 75.3 KB

This document contains the regulations for the procurement of firewood for the Social Care Center "Ziedugravas" by the Aizkraukle municipality.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for procurement AND 2026/30, which is for the purchase of firewood for the "Social Care Center "Ziedugravas"" and has a submission deadline of April 2, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for firewood procurement is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the undisclosed value and lack of explicit evaluation criteria present minor concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear CPV code and active status. Deadlines appear reasonable, and regulatory compliance is assumed given the public authority. The main concern is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which can impact legal defensibility if challenged.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, specifying the item and the beneficiary. Key requirements are referenced in attached documents, indicating a structured approach to detailing specifications. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a minor clarity issue.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, type, procedure, and deadlines. However, the estimated value and contract duration are not disclosed, which are crucial pieces of information for potential bidders.

Estimated Value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag suggests potential limitations in full document access, which could impact fairness if not resolved.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', implying electronic submission. However, the 'Issues: No e-submission' flag contradicts this, creating ambiguity. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent.

No e-submission (contradictory flag)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical, with the reveal date preceding the submission and opening dates.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. This suggests a lack of focus on these important sustainability considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Active status and open procedure
CPV code provided
Referenced detailed requirement documents
Reasonable submission deadline

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration and start date
Lack of explicit evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Ambiguity regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value and duration to provide better context for bidders.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure full document accessibility.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline