Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase of Battery-Powered Saws

Open
Deadline
12 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
167629
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latvia
Published
March 16, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€140,149
Avg. Bids
1.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
1,392 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of Battery-Powered Saws

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Submission requirements are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Eligibility requirements are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Technical requirements are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Financial requirements are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

NolikumsDOC
028_Nolikums.docx -- 87.0 KB

This document contains the regulations for the procurement of battery-powered saws by the State Defence Logistics and Procurement Centre.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167629_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260316120512.pdf -- 96.1 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the procurement of battery saws, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical, financial, and other requirements, as well as evaluation criteria.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a procurement tender for the purchase of battery saws, including identification numbers, deadlines, and contracting authority details.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for battery saws is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a defined open procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable, and there is no indication of disputes. Regulatory compliance is presumed based on the available information.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Key requirements are referenced in specific documents, which is a standard practice. The conditions for submission and eligibility are outlined, contributing to overall clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and contract duration. However, the estimated financial value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. While documents are attached, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria within the main notice reduces completeness.

Estimated Value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag and the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria in the main notice raise concerns about complete transparency and objective assessment. The requirements are outlined in a single document, which could be seen as a positive for consistency but might limit immediate access to all details without downloading.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is a positive for practical submission. However, the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks contradicts this, suggesting potential ambiguity or a reliance on older methods. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is absent.

No e-submission (contradictory flag)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which are common areas for sustainability considerations in modern tenders.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Open procedure
Reasonable submission deadline
CPV code provided
Multiple tender documents available

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Ambiguity regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the procurement.
2. Clearly state the evaluation criteria within the main tender notice or ensure full document access for all bidders.
3. Clarify the e-submission process to avoid ambiguity.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline