Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Project Manager Led Design Team for Tech Terraces - Shawfield

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
024143-2026
Value
£1,200,000
Location
West Central Scotland, United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Budget
£1,200,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
West Central Scotland
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Appointment of a Project Manager led team comprising of an Architect, Civil Structural Engineer, Geo Environmental Engineer, Building Services Engineer, Sustainability & BREEAM Assessor, Cost Consultant, Landscape Architect and Principal Designer in line with the RIBA Plan of Work 2025

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though their reasonableness is not explicitly assessed here. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the available information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required services is clear, outlining the specific roles within the project management team and referencing the RIBA Plan of Work 2025. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed by bidders.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and submission deadline. However, crucial details such as contract duration and specific evaluation criteria are missing, reducing overall completeness.

Missing contract duration
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and criteria for exclusion and capability are mentioned. The use of e-procurement is indicated. No specific company tailoring is apparent.

Practicality65/100

The tender indicates e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of explicit information on contract start date and duration, along with the absence of document content, hinders practical assessment and preparation for bidders.

No e-submission (implied by lack of URL)
Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates are logically presented within the timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions a 'Sustainability & BREEAM Assessor' role, indicating some consideration for sustainability. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement policies, social aspects, or innovation as core requirements.

Not green procurement (explicitly)
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project scope and team composition
Disclosed estimated value
Open procedure for broad participation
Use of e-procurement indicated

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration
Lack of document content/summaries
Potential for short deadline

Recommendations

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria to ensure transparency.
2. Clarify contract duration and start date for better planning.
3. Upload full tender documents or detailed summaries.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline