Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction of the "Orlik" 2025 sports complex in Wawrzeńczyce in a "design and build" formula

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00172464/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Małopolskie, Poland
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Małopolskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of the "Orlik" 2025 sports complex in Wawrzeńczyce in a "design and build" formula

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This 'design and build' Orlik sports complex tender requires a bidder with strong technical design and construction capabilities, particularly in sports facilities. Given the short duration and lack of specified evaluation criteria, a focus on demonstrating compliance, efficiency, and a clear understanding of the 'Orlik' program is crucial. Proactive engagement and a well-structured, compliant bid will be key to success.

Key Winning Messages

Proven Expertise in 'Orlik' Facilities: Demonstrate a deep understanding of and successful track record in delivering 'Orlik' sports complexes, ensuring compliance with program standards and local requirements.

Integrated Design & Build Excellence: Highlight a seamless, efficient, and collaborative approach to the 'design and build' process, minimizing risks and ensuring timely delivery.

Cost-Effective and Compliant Solution: Offer a technically sound and compliant solution that represents excellent value for money, delivered within the specified tight timeframe.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to define value through a strong technical proposal and clear demonstration of compliance.
The short 3-month duration necessitates a highly efficient and well-resourced project execution plan, which can be a differentiator if presented convincingly.
The 'Orlik' program is a national initiative, implying a need for adherence to specific, potentially well-documented, technical and quality standards.
Key Challenges
Absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to tailor the bid to specific weighting. The bid must assume a balanced approach to all stated requirements.

Develop a comprehensive bid that addresses all technical and compliance requirements thoroughly. Focus on demonstrating best practice in design, construction, and permit acquisition. Assume a holistic evaluation where technical merit, compliance, and value are all important.

The very short 3-month duration for a 'design and build' project is highly ambitious and may pose logistical and resource challenges.

Present a detailed, realistic, and resource-loaded project execution plan that clearly outlines how the design, permitting, and construction phases will be managed concurrently and efficiently within the timeframe. Highlight experienced project management and a dedicated, agile team.

Lack of information on financial requirements and eligibility criteria means a bidder must assume standard public procurement thresholds and prepare accordingly.

Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are meticulously addressed. Prepare robust financial documentation to demonstrate stability and capacity, even if specific thresholds are unknown. Consult relevant Polish public procurement law for typical requirements.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with proven experience in designing and building sports facilities, specifically those adhering to the 'Orlik' program standards. They should possess a strong in-house design team or a reliable design partner, a robust project management system, and a track record of delivering projects on time and within budget. Experience with public procurement in Poland is highly advantageous.
Key Requirements
Design of the sports complex
Construction of the sports complex
Obtaining a legally binding decision on the use permit
Technology compliant with the requirements of the investment program 'Program budowy kompleksów sportowych ‘Orlik’ 2025'
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience with the 'Orlik' program specifically, showcasing understanding of its unique requirements and benefits.
A highly detailed and innovative project execution plan that clearly addresses the tight 3-month timeline, demonstrating feasibility and efficiency.
A strong, integrated design team with a proven track record in sports facility design, capable of rapid development and client engagement.
Proactive engagement with the Contracting Authority to clarify any ambiguities regarding the 'Orlik' program standards or expectations.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a voluntary commitment to local employment during the construction phase, prioritizing residents of Gmina Igołomia-Wawrzeńczyce, and potentially offering training opportunities.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (Design & Construction)

Provide detailed design proposals that align with 'Orlik' program standards and local context. Showcase construction methodologies that ensure speed and quality. Include CVs of key personnel with relevant experience. Clearly outline the process for obtaining the use permit.

Compliance with 'Orlik' Program

Thoroughly research and reference the specific technical and quality requirements of the 'Program budowy kompleksów sportowych ‘Orlik’ 2025'. Demonstrate how the proposed design and construction will meet or exceed these standards.

Project Execution and Timeline Management

Present a highly detailed, phased project plan that explicitly addresses the 3-month duration. Highlight risk mitigation strategies for potential delays and demonstrate resource allocation to ensure timely completion.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Research 'Orlik' Program Standards
CriticalHigh effort

Deeply investigate and document all technical, material, and functional requirements of the 'Program budowy kompleksów sportowych ‘Orlik’ 2025'. Ensure the proposed design and construction plan explicitly meets or exceeds these standards.

Ensures bid compliance and demonstrates understanding of the client's core needs.
Develop a Robust, Time-Optimized Project Plan
CriticalHigh effort

Create a detailed, Gantt chart-based project plan that clearly illustrates how the design, permitting, and construction phases will be executed within the 3-month timeframe. Include critical path analysis and contingency planning.

Addresses the most significant challenge (duration) and builds confidence in delivery capability.
Showcase Prior 'Orlik' Project Experience
HighMed effort

If available, prominently feature case studies, testimonials, and detailed project summaries of previous 'Orlik' complex constructions. Quantify achievements (e.g., speed of delivery, quality outcomes).

Establishes credibility and directly addresses the implied expertise required.
Proactive Clarification Request
HighLow effort

Submit a formal request for clarification to the Contracting Authority regarding any ambiguities, especially concerning the 'Orlik' program specifics and any implicit evaluation criteria. This shows engagement and helps tailor the bid.

Reduces risk of misinterpretation and allows for a more targeted bid.
Detail Use Permit Acquisition Strategy
HighMed effort

Outline a clear, step-by-step process for obtaining the legally binding use permit, including timelines, responsible parties, and potential challenges and mitigation strategies. Demonstrate familiarity with local permitting procedures.

Addresses a critical mandatory requirement and demonstrates preparedness.
Propose Local Employment Commitment
MediumLow effort

Include a voluntary commitment to prioritize local labor from Gmina Igołomia-Wawrzeńczyce for construction roles, potentially including a small training component.

Adds a positive, albeit non-mandatory, element to the bid, aligning with broader public sector goals.
Emphasize Integrated Design-Build Efficiency
MediumMed effort

Highlight how an integrated design and build approach will streamline the process, reduce coordination issues, and ensure a cohesive final product that meets all program requirements.

Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the procurement model and its benefits.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and experienced provider for 'Orlik' facilities, emphasizing a proven ability to deliver complex sports projects on time and to the highest standards. Highlight the efficiency and synergy of an integrated design-build team as a key advantage over competitors who may rely on separate design and construction entities.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Design of the sports complex.
--Construction of the sports complex.
--Obtaining a legally binding decision on the use permit.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8b15-126e-fb20-5fad-950001e70dbd.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the construction of the 'Orlik' sports complex in Wawrzeńczyce, Poland, under a design and build contract.

SWZ_GK_271_5_2026.pdfPDF
SWZ_GK_271_5_2026.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the design and construction of the "Orlik" sports complex in Wawrzeńczyce, Poland.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the 'Orlik' sports complex construction in Wawrzeńczyce is generally well-structured, with a clear scope and ample documentation. However, the estimated value is undisclosed, and evaluation criteria are missing, impacting transparency and potentially fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. The submission deadline, while potentially short for a design-build project, is clearly stated. No disputes or suspensions are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed given the structure.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, outlining the 'design and build' nature and the specific requirements for obtaining a use permit. The technical requirements are documented, though evaluation criteria are absent, which slightly reduces overall clarity.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and a clear description. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is not disclosed, which is a concern for transparency. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could lead to subjective assessments. However, there are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The short contract duration of 3 months for a design-build project might be impractical.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The data appears consistent within the provided information.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded.

No explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation)

Strengths

Clear project scope and 'design and build' methodology
Comprehensive set of attached documents
E-procurement utilized
Standard CPV code and reference number provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria missing
Short contract duration for design and build
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Re-evaluate the contract duration to ensure feasibility for a design-build project.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline