Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Batteries

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7147882
Value
€63,635
Location
Panevezys County, Lithuania
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€63,635
Duration
9 months
Location
Panevezys County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€596,380
Avg. Bids
3.2
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
456 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Batteries.
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for lithium batteries presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, competitive pricing, and a clear understanding of military procurement nuances, particularly concerning reliability and supply chain security. While social and green aspects are not explicitly required, demonstrating a commitment to ethical sourcing and sustainable practices can provide a subtle advantage.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable Power Solutions for Critical Operations: Delivering high-performance, dependable lithium batteries that meet the stringent demands of military applications, ensuring operational readiness.

Cost-Effective Procurement with Assured Quality: Offering competitive pricing without compromising on the quality and reliability essential for the Lithuanian Army's needs.

Secure and Transparent Supply Chain: Guaranteeing a consistent and traceable supply of batteries, mitigating risks associated with geopolitical factors and ensuring timely delivery.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for strategic emphasis on key strengths.
Focus on technical specifications and reliability can differentiate bidders.
The relatively low estimated value might deter larger, less agile competitors, creating an opening for specialized suppliers.
Opportunity to build a relationship with a specific military unit.
Key Challenges
Absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to tailor the bid effectively.

Assume a weighted approach where technical capability and price will be paramount. Focus on exceeding minimum technical requirements and offering a highly competitive price. Clearly articulate the value proposition in all sections of the bid.

Potential for high competition from established battery suppliers.

Thoroughly research potential competitors. Highlight unique selling points such as superior battery lifespan, faster charging capabilities, or specialized certifications that competitors may lack. Emphasize a strong understanding of military operational environments.

Ensuring compliance with all mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds.

Conduct a rigorous internal review of all mandatory requirements. Prepare all necessary documentation well in advance and seek legal counsel if any ambiguity exists regarding exclusion grounds.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established supplier of lithium batteries with a proven track record of supplying to government or military entities, possessing strong quality control processes, a reliable supply chain, and the ability to offer competitive pricing for bulk orders. Experience with military-grade specifications and certifications would be highly advantageous.
Key Requirements
Technical Capability Requirements (Lithium Batteries)
Eligibility Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience supplying lithium batteries to military or defense organizations, backed by references or case studies.
Superior technical specifications (e.g., higher energy density, longer cycle life, wider operating temperature range) compared to standard offerings.
A robust quality assurance and testing process specifically tailored for high-reliability applications.
A clear and concise supply chain management plan that emphasizes security, traceability, and contingency planning.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider including a statement on ethical sourcing of raw materials and responsible battery disposal/recycling practices. This demonstrates forward-thinking and corporate responsibility, which can be a subtle differentiator.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability

Provide detailed technical specifications for the proposed lithium batteries, clearly demonstrating compliance with any implied military-grade requirements. Include data sheets, performance charts, and certifications. Highlight any unique features that enhance reliability, longevity, or performance in demanding environments.

Price

Develop a highly competitive pricing structure. Consider offering volume discounts or tiered pricing. Clearly outline the total cost of ownership, including any potential maintenance or support aspects if applicable.

Eligibility and Exclusion Grounds

Ensure absolute compliance. Provide all requested documentation accurately and promptly. Any misstep here will lead to immediate disqualification.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Address Technical Capability
CriticalHigh effort

Provide detailed technical specifications, performance data, and relevant certifications for the proposed lithium batteries. Emphasize reliability, durability, and suitability for military applications. If possible, highlight any unique technical advantages.

Directly addresses a core requirement and is likely a primary evaluation factor.
Develop a Competitive Pricing Strategy
CriticalMed effort

Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, price will likely be a significant factor. Conduct thorough cost analysis to offer a competitive price while ensuring profitability. Consider offering tiered pricing or volume discounts.

Crucial for winning a tender where other criteria are not explicitly weighted.
Highlight Military Supply Chain Experience
HighMed effort

If the bidder has prior experience supplying to defense or government entities, this should be prominently featured. Detail the robustness and security of the supply chain, including contingency plans.

Builds trust and demonstrates understanding of the client's specific needs and risk appetite.
Rigorous Compliance Check
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct an exhaustive review of all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements. Ensure all documentation is complete, accurate, and submitted within the specified format and deadline.

Prevents immediate disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Incorporate Ethical Sourcing Statement
LowLow effort

Although not a requirement, a brief statement on ethical sourcing of materials and responsible disposal can subtly enhance the bid's appeal and demonstrate corporate responsibility.

Minor positive impression, potentially a tie-breaker in very close bids.
Clarify Ambiguities Early
HighLow effort

If any tender requirements are unclear, proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority through the designated channels before the deadline.

Avoids misinterpretation and ensures the bid meets all expectations.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as offering the best balance of technical performance, reliability, and cost-effectiveness for military-grade lithium batteries. Emphasize a proven track record and a secure, transparent supply chain to mitigate perceived risks for the contracting authority.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

BaterijosDOC
BATERIJOS kvietimas.docx

This document is a tender invitation for the purchase of batteries by the Lithuanian Army's King Mindaugas Hussar Battalion, outlining the procurement object, procedures, and evaluation criteria.

NoticePDF
Notice_7147882.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of lithium batteries by the Lithuanian Army's King Mindaugas Hussar Battalion.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for batteries from the Lithuanian Army is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and EU funding noted. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting practicality and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure is open, and the organization is clearly identified. The deadline is relatively short, which could be a minor concern for some bidders.

Deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The description 'Baterijos' is very brief. While the AI-extracted requirements list general categories, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Vague description
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and attached documents. However, the lack of a reveal date for the opening of bids is a notable omission.

Missing reveal date
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The AI-extracted requirements are standard categories, suggesting a fair approach. There are no immediate indications of requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section explicitly states 'No e-submission', which is a contradiction and a significant concern for practical submission. The contract start date is not specified.

No e-submission (contradiction with E-Procurement characteristic)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical within the context of the tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information (title, reference, organization, value)
CPV code provided
EU Funded status indicated
Documents available

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Vague description
Contradiction regarding e-submission
Missing reveal date

Recommendations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria and the e-submission process.
2. Provide a more detailed description of the batteries required.
3. Specify the contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline