Skip to main content
Tenders

KASP 3R perimeter fence k1 (H. Manto g. 45a, Klaipėda) repair (stage II) (tender announced)

Open
Deadline
21 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7132535
Value
€13,388
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Tender Opening

April 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€13,388
Duration
3 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

To carry out the repair of the KASP 3R perimeter fence k1 (H. Manto g. 45a, Klaipėda) according to the approved on 2025-06-17

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Pasiūlymo formaDOC
2 priedas.Tiekėjo pasiūlymas-KASP 3R tvoros r...

This document is a bid form for the repair of the KASP 3R perimeter fence at H. Manto g. 45a, Klaipėda, requiring bidders to confirm acceptance of tender conditions and provide their proposed price.

Sutarties projektasDOC
4 Priedas.KASP 3R tvoros remonto darbų sutart...

This document contains a draft public procurement contract for simple repair works, specifying terms and conditions between the Lithuanian Army Logistics Command and a contractor.

Bendrosios skelbiamos apklausos sąlygosDOC
Bendrosios skelbiamos apklausos sąlygos - KAS...

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for an open tender procedure for the repair of a KASP 3R perimeter fence in Klaipėda.

Specialiosios sąlygosDOC
Specialiosios sąlygos - KASP 3R tvoros remont...

This document contains special conditions for a tender to perform repair works on the KASP 3R perimeter fence in Klaipėda, including requirements for bidders, submission procedures, and evaluation criteria.

Darbų kiekio žiniaraštisPDF
3 Priedas. DKŽ - ST-96.pdf

This document contains a bill of quantities for the simple repair of the perimeter fence at KASP 3R, H. Manto g. 45a, Klaipėda, including technical specifications and material requirements.

NoticePDF
Notice_7132535.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the repair of the KASP 3R perimeter fence k1 in Klaipėda, Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7132535_1.xml

This document contains the complete tender structure for a simplified open procedure, including a mandatory file submission for the repair of the KASP 3R perimeter fence in Klaipėda.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for fence repair is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and explicit sustainability considerations. The short deadline and absence of detailed eligibility requirements are minor concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and contract draft. However, the absence of a specified reveal date for submissions and the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could be seen as minor procedural gaps.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear description of the works required and lists essential documents such as the contract draft, general conditions, bill of quantities, and bid form. The requirements are documented, but specific eligibility and technical criteria are not detailed.

No specific eligibility requirements listed
No specific technical capability requirements listed
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. Seven tender documents are attached, covering key aspects of the procurement. However, the absence of detailed eligibility and technical requirements impacts overall completeness.

No specific eligibility requirements listed
No specific technical capability requirements listed
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with full document access provided and the estimated value disclosed. The use of e-procurement and objective criteria (implied through the bill of quantities) contributes to fairness. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope of work, and no company-specific tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'Checks' section indicates 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'Procurement Characteristics'. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent, impacting practicality.

No e-submission (contradicts procurement characteristics)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, and the contract duration is specified.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided
Use of e-procurement (indicated)
Estimated value and contract duration disclosed
No apparent company-specific tailoring

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific eligibility or technical requirements detailed
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission
Lack of sustainability considerations
Short submission deadline (potentially)

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly.
2. Detail eligibility and technical capability requirements.
3. Clarify e-submission process and confirm its availability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline