Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Rental of passenger bus with driver

Open
Deadline
7 days left
April 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7130052
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 12, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€650,589
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
93%
722 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Rental of passenger bus with driver
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for bus rental with a driver by the Lithuanian Army's Juozas Lukša Training Centre presents a moderate competition opportunity. The lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements necessitates a proactive approach focused on demonstrating reliability, competitive pricing, and a clear understanding of military operational needs. Winning will hinge on a well-structured proposal that implicitly addresses potential concerns and highlights operational excellence.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Secure Transportation for Military Operations

Cost-Effective and Efficient Bus Rental Solutions

Unwavering Commitment to Service Excellence and Driver Professionalism

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for strategic framing of the bid.
Absence of explicit Green or Social Procurement requirements allows focus on core service delivery and cost.
The tender is for a 12-month duration, suggesting a need for consistent, dependable service.
The contracting authority is a military training center, implying a need for understanding operational tempo and potential for last-minute changes.
Key Challenges
Absence of defined evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid scoring.

Assume a weighted approach prioritizing price, reliability, and suitability of the bus. Focus on clearly articulating value and operational capability in all sections of the proposal.

Lack of specific technical and financial requirements means bidders must self-certify and demonstrate capability.

Proactively provide comprehensive details on fleet condition, driver qualifications, safety records, and financial stability to build trust and demonstrate competence.

Potential for a price-sensitive award due to the lack of other specified criteria.

Develop a competitive pricing strategy that balances profitability with market competitiveness. Highlight the total cost of ownership, including reliability and reduced downtime, rather than just the headline price.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established transport provider with a proven track record of reliable service, particularly to public sector or military clients. The ideal bidder possesses a modern, well-maintained fleet of buses suitable for passenger transport, experienced and vetted drivers, and a robust operational framework ensuring punctuality and safety. They should also have the capacity to respond quickly to changing operational demands.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of agreement with all procurement conditions
Provision of passenger bus rental with a driver
Adherence to service requirements outlined in the contract appendices
Completion and submission of the proposal form
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience with military or government contracts.
A modern and well-maintained fleet with specific features beneficial for troop transport (e.g., comfort, safety features).
Highly professional and vetted drivers with security clearances or experience working in sensitive environments.
Flexible scheduling and responsiveness to potential urgent or changing requirements.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, a commitment to employing local drivers or offering training opportunities to unemployed individuals can be a subtle differentiator, especially if framed as enhancing local community support for the military.
Bid Focus Areas
Price

Offer a competitive price that reflects value for money. Benchmark against similar services and ensure profitability. Consider offering tiered pricing for different service levels if applicable, though not explicitly requested.

Reliability and Service Quality

Emphasize a proven track record, fleet maintenance schedules, driver training, and contingency plans for breakdowns or driver absence. Highlight punctuality and adherence to schedules.

Suitability of Bus and Driver

Clearly describe the bus capacity, comfort, safety features, and any specific adaptations for passenger transport. Detail driver qualifications, experience, and professionalism.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Review All Tender Documents
CriticalMed effort

Scrutinize 'Įsigijimo sąlygos' and 'Sutartis' for any implied requirements or nuances not explicitly stated. Pay close attention to the appendices detailing service requirements and the handover-acceptance act.

Ensures full compliance and avoids disqualification.
Assume a Price-Led Evaluation with Implicit Quality Weighting
CriticalHigh effort

Given the lack of specified criteria, assume price will be a primary driver, but quality and reliability will be implicitly assessed. Structure the bid to demonstrate superior value for money.

Maximizes chances of winning by addressing likely award factors.
Highlight Fleet Modernity and Safety Features
HighMed effort

Detail the age, maintenance, and safety features of the proposed bus(es). Mention any certifications or compliance with relevant transport safety standards.

Builds confidence in the bidder's capability and commitment to safety.
Provide Detailed Driver Information
HighMed effort

Outline driver experience, licensing, any relevant training (e.g., defensive driving, first aid), and background checks. Emphasize professionalism and discretion.

Addresses a key component of the service and builds trust.
Develop a Contingency Plan
MediumMed effort

Outline procedures for vehicle breakdown, driver illness, or other unforeseen circumstances. This demonstrates preparedness and reliability.

Mitigates risk for the contracting authority and enhances perceived reliability.
Subtly Emphasize Local Employment
LowLow effort

If applicable, mention that drivers are local to the region or that the company contributes to the local economy through employment.

Adds a positive, albeit minor, dimension to the bid.
Complete Proposal Form Accurately and Comprehensively
CriticalLow effort

Ensure all fields in 'Pasiūlymo pateikimo forma' are filled out correctly and completely, confirming agreement with all conditions.

Essential for bid validity.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and cost-effective solution for the Lithuanian Army's training needs. Emphasize a 'no-surprises' approach to service delivery, highlighting operational efficiency and driver professionalism. Contrast this with potentially less experienced or less specialized competitors by showcasing a robust operational framework and a commitment to military-grade service standards.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Įsigijimo sąlygosDOC
isigijimo salygos autobuso nuoma.docx

This document contains the procurement conditions for a low-value tender for bus rental with a driver, issued by the Major Juozas Lukša Training Centre of the Lithuanian Army.

Pasiūlymo pateikimo formaDOC
Pasiūlymo pateikimo forma.docx

This document is a proposal form for renting a passenger bus with a driver, confirming agreement with all tender conditions and providing details of the offer.

SutartisDOC
Supaprastinta+sutartis keleiviu pervezimo pas...

This document contains appendices to a contract for passenger bus rental with a driver, detailing service requirements, a handover-acceptance act, and a confidentiality pledge.

NoticePDF
Notice_7130052.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the rental of a passenger bus with a driver by the Lithuanian Army Ground Forces Juozas Lukša Training Centre.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7130052_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a simplified open tender for bus rental with a driver, requiring a complete tender submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for bus rental with a driver is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a straightforward process. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. The deadlines appear reasonable for an open tender, and no disputes are noted. The use of e-procurement aligns with regulatory requirements.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the attached documents provide necessary details regarding terms, conditions, and contract drafts. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated, which could be a minor point of confusion.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The submission deadline is provided.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and e-procurement is utilized, promoting fairness. All documents are accessible, and the process appears objective. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'No e-submission' check in the provided statistics contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, creating ambiguity. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no noted suspensions or disputes. The 'Missing reveal date' issue is minor and does not impact overall consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' but does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria, limiting its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and service description
Comprehensive set of required documents (terms, contract draft, forms)
Use of e-procurement
Active status and clear reference number

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Ambiguity regarding e-submission vs. E-Procurement characteristic
Lack of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation)

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submitted proposals.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure consistency with the E-Procurement characteristic.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline