Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Kaunas MBA security services

Open
Deadline
30 days left
May 04, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7085091
Value
€169,200
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 04, 2026

Tender Opening

May 04, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€169,200
Duration
24 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€694,267
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
942 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Kaunas MBA security services
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Kaunas MBA security services presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, competitive pricing, and a clear understanding of the contracting authority's needs, leveraging the absence of explicit evaluation criteria to our advantage.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Cost-Effective Security Solutions for Kaunas MBA

Proven Expertise in Securing Public Infrastructure

Commitment to Operational Excellence and Client Satisfaction

Key Opportunities
Absence of Explicit Evaluation Criteria
Moderate Estimated Value and Duration
Standardized Procurement Process (ESPD)
Key Challenges
Lack of Specified Evaluation Criteria

Assume a balanced approach where all mandatory requirements are met, and price will likely be a significant factor. Focus on exceeding minimum technical requirements and presenting a clear, competitive price.

Potential for Undisclosed Technical Expectations

Thoroughly analyze the CPV code (79710000 - Apsaugos paslaugos) and common industry best practices for security services. Proactively detail operational plans, staffing, and technology to demonstrate comprehensive understanding.

Competition from established local providers

Highlight unique selling propositions such as specialized training, advanced technology integration (even if not explicitly requested), or superior customer service models.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established security services provider with a proven track record in public sector contracts, possessing strong operational capacity, a skilled workforce, and a competitive pricing model. Experience with waste management or similar industrial facilities would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Eligibility Requirements
Technical Capability Requirements
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements (including ESPD and Tender Structure XML)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience with similar public sector entities or waste management facilities.
Proactive proposal of enhanced security measures beyond the minimum requirements.
Highly competitive and transparent pricing structure.
A clear and concise operational plan that addresses potential risks specific to the MBA facility.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, consider a subtle commitment to employing local workforce or providing training opportunities, framing it as operational efficiency and community engagement, which can be a positive differentiator if other bidders do not.
Bid Focus Areas
Mandatory Requirements (Exclusion, Eligibility, Technical, Financial, Submission)

Ensure 100% compliance with all mandatory requirements. Errors here lead to immediate disqualification. Leverage the ESPD and XML structure to ensure all uploaded documents are correctly formatted and complete.

Technical CapabilityN/A (assumed high importance)

Detail staffing levels, training programs, operational procedures, incident response plans, and any relevant certifications. Provide concrete examples of past successful service delivery.

PriceN/A (assumed high importance due to lack of other criteria)

Develop a cost-effective pricing model that is competitive yet sustainable. Clearly articulate the value proposition associated with the price.

Recommendations6
Meticulous ESPD and Document Completion
CriticalHigh effort

Ensure the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) and all other required files (e.g., Tender Structure XML) are completed accurately and without error. Pay close attention to the corrupted file snippet in README.txt and ensure the correct ESPD request is used.

Avoids immediate disqualification due to administrative errors.
Assume Price is a Key Differentiator
CriticalHigh effort

Given the absence of specified evaluation criteria, assume that price will be a significant, if not the primary, factor. Develop a competitive pricing strategy that reflects the estimated value and duration, while ensuring profitability.

Increases chances of winning if price is a major deciding factor.
Demonstrate Proactive Risk Management
HighMed effort

Outline specific security protocols and contingency plans tailored to the Kauno MBA facility. This demonstrates a deep understanding of the client's environment and a commitment to preventing issues.

Positions the bidder as a proactive and reliable partner.
Detail Operational Excellence
HighMed effort

Provide a comprehensive overview of operational procedures, including staffing models, shift management, communication protocols, and quality control mechanisms. Use concrete examples of past performance.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver high-quality services.
Subtle Local Employment/Training Commitment
LowLow effort

Although social aspects are not explicitly requested, a brief mention of a commitment to utilizing local personnel or offering training can be a subtle differentiator, framing it as operational efficiency and community support.

May provide a slight edge if competitors do not address it.
Clarify Ambiguities with Contracting Authority
MediumLow effort

If any aspect of the tender requirements remains unclear, particularly regarding the corrupted README.txt or the lack of evaluation criteria, proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority through the designated channels.

Ensures a complete and accurate bid, avoiding misinterpretations.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on quality or reliability. Emphasize operational efficiency and a proven track record to justify the proposed price. Highlight any specific experience relevant to waste management facilities or similar industrial environments.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Specialiosios sutarties projekto sąlygosDOC
9.1 priedas. Specialiosios sutarties projekto...

This document contains the special conditions for the procurement and sale agreement for security services for Kauno MBA.

9.2 priedas Bendrosios sutarties projekto sąlygosDOC
9.2 priedas. Bendrosios sutarties projekto są...

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a service purchase and sale agreement, defining key terms and outlining the hierarchy of contractual documents.

Atviro konkurso bendrosios sąlygosDOC
Atviro konkurso bendrosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for an open tender procedure for security services for Kauno MBA.

Atviro konkurso specialiosios sąlygosDOC
Atviro konkurso specialiosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains the special conditions for an open tender for security services for Kauno MBA, outlining requirements for bidders, submission procedures, and evaluation criteria.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 82.8 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7085091.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for security services for Kauno MBA, issued by VšĮ Kauno regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras in Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a corrupted file snippet, likely an ESPD request, with no discernible content relevant to the Kauno MBA security services tender.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7085091_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload for the Kauno MBA security services tender.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 245.5 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for the Kauno MBA security services tender.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for security services is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses the correct CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the submission date. No disputes are noted. The procedure is clearly defined as open.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear. While specific evaluation criteria are missing, the presence of contract drafts and special/general conditions provides a good foundation for understanding requirements.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. A good number of documents are attached, covering contract drafts and submission templates. However, the ESPD-related documents are not fully accessible or clear.

ESPD document content not fully extracted/clear
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting broad access. The value is disclosed, and criteria are generally objective, though specific evaluation criteria are absent. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks suggests a potential contradiction or lack of clarity on the submission method. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Potential contradiction regarding e-submission method
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no noted suspensions or disputes. The CPV code is appropriate.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear open tender procedure (2014/24/ES)
Comprehensive set of contract draft documents
E-procurement indicated
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Unclear ESPD document content
Potential ambiguity regarding e-submission process
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clarify specific evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Ensure all ESPD-related documents are fully accessible and understandable.
3. Provide explicit details on the e-submission process and any associated platforms.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline