Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Public transport services (Open international procurement)

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6952995
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2026

Tender Opening

April 21, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
14 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€650,589
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
93%
722 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority will conclude a preliminary purchase and sale agreement, on the basis of which the procurement...
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for public transport services in Vilnius presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning bid will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, a clear understanding of the pricing structure, and a commitment to quality service delivery, particularly through experienced personnel. Leveraging the 'price-quality' evaluation criterion and highlighting sustainability will be crucial for differentiation.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Sustainable Public Transport for Vilnius: Delivering high-quality, environmentally conscious public transport services through experienced personnel and efficient operations.

Value-Driven Service Excellence: Maximizing the price-quality ratio by offering a superior service through experienced specialists and optimized operational efficiency.

Key Opportunities
Leveraging the 'Price-Quality' evaluation criterion to differentiate beyond just the lowest price.
Demonstrating commitment to Green Procurement, even if not explicitly mandated as a primary evaluation factor.
The absence of specified technical and financial requirements suggests a focus on demonstrated capability and value, allowing for more flexible proposals.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to precisely optimize the bid.

Assume a balanced approach between price and quality, with a strong emphasis on the explicitly mentioned 'responsible specialist experience'. Proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority if possible, or prepare for a scenario where price is a significant factor, but quality is also considered.

The tender is open and international, implying a potentially broad range of competitors.

Focus on local knowledge and understanding of Vilnius's specific transport needs, alongside a strong value proposition that addresses both cost and service quality.

The ESPD requirement is mandatory and requires careful completion.

Ensure meticulous review and accurate completion of the ESPD, cross-referencing all provided documentation and internal records to avoid exclusion.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established public transport operator with a proven track record in delivering similar services, possessing a fleet of modern, eco-friendly vehicles, and a strong team of experienced and qualified drivers and operational staff. The ideal bidder will also have a clear strategy for integrating green procurement principles and a demonstrated ability to manage contract performance effectively.
Key Requirements
European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) submission
Demonstrated experience of responsible specialist for contract execution (as per Pasiūlymo formos 3.1 priedas)
Compliance with Green Procurement principles
Public road transport services (CPV: 60112000)
Contract duration of 14 months
Key Discriminators
Exceptional experience and qualifications of the proposed responsible specialist.
A clear and compelling strategy for achieving Green Procurement objectives, potentially exceeding minimum requirements.
Innovative operational approaches that enhance efficiency and service quality, even if innovation is not a formal evaluation criterion.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to employing local workforce, with a focus on fair wages and working conditions, and potentially offering training opportunities for new drivers or support staff.
Bid Focus Areas
Price

Develop a competitive pricing strategy that reflects the cost of delivering high-quality service while remaining attractive. Consider the long-term value proposition rather than just short-term cost savings.

Quality (Responsible Specialist Experience)High (implied by DOCUMENT 4)

Proactively identify and present the most experienced and qualified specialist. Provide detailed CVs and testimonials that clearly demonstrate their expertise in managing public transport operations.

Green ProcurementMedium (implied by TENDER DESCRIPTION)

Detail the fleet's environmental credentials (e.g., Euro standards, hybrid/electric vehicles), fuel efficiency measures, and waste management practices. Highlight any initiatives to reduce carbon footprint.

Recommendations6
Meticulous ESPD Completion
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly review and accurately complete all sections of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in both XML and PDF formats. Ensure all mandatory fields are populated and that information aligns with other tender documents.

Avoids mandatory exclusion from the tender process.
Maximize 'Responsible Specialist' Score
CriticalHigh effort

As per 'Pasiūlymo formos 3.1 priedas', the experience of the responsible specialist is a key evaluation factor. Select the most qualified individual and present their experience, qualifications, and relevant project history in a compelling manner, supported by evidence.

Significantly improves the bid's score in the quality component of the price-quality criterion.
Showcase Green Procurement Commitment
HighMed effort

While not explicitly an evaluation criterion, 'GREEN PROCUREMENT: Yes' indicates its importance. Detail specific measures for fleet modernization, emission reduction, and sustainable operational practices. This can be a strong differentiator against less environmentally conscious competitors.

Enhances the bid's appeal and demonstrates alignment with public sector sustainability goals.
Develop a Value-Based Pricing Strategy
MediumMed effort

Given the 'price-quality' criterion, avoid a purely lowest-bid approach. Develop a pricing structure that reflects the cost of delivering high-quality, sustainable services, justifying any premium through the demonstrated expertise and operational efficiencies.

Optimizes the bid's position in the price-quality evaluation.
Integrate Local Employment Commitments
MediumLow effort

Include a commitment to local employment, fair labor practices, and potential training initiatives. This aligns with broader social value expectations and can resonate with the contracting authority.

Adds a layer of social responsibility to the bid, potentially influencing overall perception.
Address Unspecified Evaluation Criteria
HighMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified beyond the price-quality mention, prepare for a scenario where price is heavily weighted. Ensure the bid is cost-competitive while still highlighting quality and sustainability as value-adds.

Reduces the risk of being out-competed on price or failing to meet unstated expectations.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the optimal balance of cost-effectiveness and superior service quality, driven by unparalleled specialist experience and a commitment to sustainable transport solutions for Vilnius.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

13 documents available with AI summaries

Atviro konkurso bendrosios sąlygosDOC
Atviro konkurso bendrosios salygos BS.docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for an open tender procedure, outlining definitions, provisions, and the composition of tender documents.

Pasiūlymo formos 3.1 priedasDOC
Pasiūlymo formos 3.1. priedas.docx

This document is an appendix to the offer form, specifically for the second criterion (B) related to the experience of the specialist responsible for contract execution, requiring the bidder to provide the specialist's name and confirm the accuracy of the information.

Pirkimo sąlygų 3 priedasDOC
Pirkimo+sąlygų+3+priedas+Pasiūlymo+forma.docx

This document contains the 'Offer Form' for the procurement of 'Public Transport Services', requiring bidders to provide supplier information, details on subcontracted entities, quality criteria, and pricing, along with mandatory declarations.

Pirkimo sąlygų 5 priedasDOC
Pirkimo+salygu+5+priedas+Preliminari+sutartis...

This document contains the draft of a preliminary purchase-sale agreement for public transport services, outlining terms and conditions for future purchase contracts.

Pirkimo sąlygų 7 priedasDOC
Pirkimo sąlygų 7 priedas Tiekėjų pašalinimo p...

This document outlines the grounds for excluding bidders from a procurement procedure, specifying that only the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) is initially required, with further documentation requested only from the most economically advantageous bidder.

TSDOC
TS+viesojo+transporto+paslaugos.docx

This document contains the technical specifications for public transport services, including the acquisition and topping up of JUDU (Vilnius resident) cards and electronic tickets for public transport and Neris river navigation.

Atviro konkurso spec. sąlygosDOC
Viesojo+transporto+paslaugu+Atviro.konkurso.s...

This document contains the special terms and conditions for an open tender for public transport services, including requirements for bidders and procurement object details.

Bendrosios ir specialiosios sutarties sąlygosDOC
Viesojo+transporto+paslaugu+bendr+++spec+suta...

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a services purchase and sale agreement, defining key terms and outlining the hierarchy of contractual documents.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.3 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6952995.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for public road transport services in Vilnius, Lithuania, with submissions due by April 21, 2026.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains an ESPD request in XML format, likely used for electronic submission of procurement information.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6952995_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for a complete tender submission, indicating a mandatory file upload for the tender.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.4 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in XML format, likely for a tender process involving a preliminary purchase and sale agreement.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for public transport services in Vilnius is generally well-structured but lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial value, impacting its overall completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open international procedure (2014/24/ES) and specifies a CPV code. While deadlines are present, the absence of a reveal date and potential for a short submission window are minor concerns. Regulatory compliance is assumed given the procedure type.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and key documents like technical specifications and contract drafts are available. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. The submission deadline is provided, but the tender validity period is also stated.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, promoting accessibility. Objective criteria are not explicitly stated, and the lack of disclosed value could be a concern for some bidders. No specific company tailoring is apparent.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests a potential issue with the submission process, and financing information is not detailed. The contract start date is not specified.

No e-submission (flagged in checks)
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the provided context.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and CPV code specified
Key documents available and analyzed
E-procurement utilized

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Potential issues with e-submission process
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submitted proposals.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure it is fully functional.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline