UAB "Toksika" internal audit services

This tender for internal audit services is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the organization is a state-controlled entity, suggesting regulatory compliance. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the missing reveal date, which is a procedural oversight.

The description of services is clear, and the attached documents provide structure and forms for submission. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, CPV, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding financing are missing, which affects the completeness of the tender package.

The tender is an open procedure, and all documents appear to be accessible. The use of e-procurement and objective criteria (implied by the forms) promotes fairness. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies.

While e-procurement is mentioned, the specific mechanism for e-submission is not detailed. The contract start date is not specified, and the lack of financing information hinders practical planning for potential bidders. The deadline, while provided, might be considered short given the complexity of preparing a bid for audit services.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The absence of a reveal date is a minor inconsistency.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. The tender is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these modern procurement considerations.