Description of the simple repair of the 4.46 km viaduct on the A5 Kaunas–Marijampolė–Suvalkai highway*

This tender for viaduct repair works on the A5 highway is generally well-structured with a good number of supporting documents. However, the estimated value is undisclosed, and specific evaluation criteria are missing, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (Code: 2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and no disputes are indicated. The procedure is open, suggesting regulatory compliance.

The title and description are clear, and a good number of documents are provided, suggesting detailed requirements are available within them. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the main tender information reduces overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, duration, and organization. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While many documents are attached, their specific content regarding requirements is not fully detailed in the summary.

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement characteristics, promoting fairness. The disclosure of a contract duration and the availability of numerous documents suggest transparency. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and explicitly stated evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. While document URLs are implied through the document list, their direct accessibility isn't confirmed.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and no suspension or disputes are noted. Dates appear logically sequenced.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.