Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation (modernization) of a road section in the town of Stara Wieś

Open
Deadline
7 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00161977/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Łódzkie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Łódzkie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation (modernization) of a road section in the town of Stara Wieś

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8597-3aac-6bce-056e-e500011b81b9.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the renovation (modernization) of a road section in Stara Wieś, Poland, issued by GMINA BIAŁA RAWSKA.

Projekt - dr. w m. Stara Wieś.pdfPDF
Projekt - dr. w m. Stara Wieś.pdf -- 5.6 MB

No content extracted

PRZEDMIAR robót dr. w m. Stara Wieś.pdfPDF
PRZEDMIAR robót dr. w m. Stara Wieś.pdf -- 120.4 KB

No content extracted

STWiOR - dr. w m. Stara Wieś.pdfPDF
STWiOR - dr. w m. Stara Wieś.pdf -- 525.6 KB

No content extracted

SWZ.pdfPDF
SWZ.pdf -- 445.3 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 2 do SWZ oświadczenie.docxDOC
Zał. nr 2 do SWZ oświadczenie.docx -- 21.0 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 3 do SWZ podmiot trzeci.docxDOC
Zał. nr 3 do SWZ podmiot trzeci.docx -- 22.8 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 4 oświadczenie gr. kapitałowa.docxDOC
Zał. nr 4 oświadczenie gr. kapitałowa.docx -- 15.3 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 5 do SWZ umowa.docxDOC
Zał. nr 5 do SWZ umowa.docx -- 63.1 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 6 do SWZ OPZ.docxDOC
Zał. nr 6 do SWZ OPZ.docx -- 21.5 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 7 do SWZ oświadczenie o wykonaniu prac przez poszczególnych wykonawców.d...DOC
Zał. nr 7 do SWZ oświadczenie o wykonaniu pra... -- 19.3 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road renovation is generally well-structured with available documentation, but lacks specific detail on evaluation criteria and financing, impacting its overall clarity and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, CPV code, and clear organization details. However, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could lead to procedural ambiguity. The deadline seems reasonable within the context of Polish procurement but could be tighter for complex projects.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The tender's subject matter and location are clearly defined. The availability of project documentation, technical specifications, and cost estimates enhances clarity. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria leaves potential bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Key information such as the title, organization, and submission deadline is present. The CPV code is provided, and multiple related documents are listed. However, crucial financial details like the estimated value are missing, and the contract duration is not specified, which reduces overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes transparency. Access to project documentation appears to be provided. No specific requirements tailored to individual companies are apparent, suggesting a fair process. The value is not disclosed, which is a minor drawback for fairness assessment.

Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The use of e-procurement is a positive for practicality. However, the absence of explicit information regarding the contract start date and financing details makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully assess the project's feasibility and their financial planning. No explicit e-submission instruction is mentioned beyond general e-procurement.

No e-submission mentioned
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

The tender exhibits strong data consistency, with key fields populated and logical date formatting for the submission deadline. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating a stable procurement process.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement policies, social aspects, or innovation focus. This lack of emphasis on sustainability aspects reduces its score in this category.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details
CPV code provided
Multiple relevant documents listed and attached
Utilizes e-procurement

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration and start date
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria for bids.
2. Disclose the estimated contract value and duration to enhance completeness and fairness.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline